Comments on: Obama’s Resolution to Stifle Free Speech on Islam – by Deborah Weiss

By: Robert Laity

Robert Laity — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:20:18 +0000

ISLAM IS NOT A 'RELIGION"- http://www.nmatv.com/video/618/What-islam-Is-Not

By: Robert Laity

Robert Laity — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:18:16 +0000

18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381. The penalty for treason is DEATH!

By: Mary

Mary — Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:00:27 +0000

Living in England for years I see the indifference, apathy and ultimate
submission to Sharia laws and norms. Its not fully official yet, but no
one dares to oppose any muslim in any way. I have a couple of times
when their tactics have become unbearable to be shouted at:
Youre racist! Well, Im not, but there are worse things than racism here.
Islam is not a race, but an ideology. Muslims here are arrogant,
ignorant and oppressive yet the British tolerate this for the sake of
peace. They have forgotten Nazism, and cannot see its face is
Islam. Yet.

By: Robert Laity

Robert Laity — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:52:13 +0000

There is no such thing as a peaceful muslim…oxymoronic.

By: winniec

winniec — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:24:53 +0000

Obama is a Neville Chamberlain. Welcome to Munich…next stop Poland.

By: MizPris

MizPris — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:21:12 +0000

Hi Mahdi
What can we expect from someone who said in his own book, “if things turn ugly I will stand with the muslims”, Barack Obama, author.

By: The Hate Campaign at Temple Is Part of a Global Assault on American Freedom « NewsReal Blog

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:23:58 +0000

[...] worst human rights violators on the planet (now joined by the Obama Administration) has recently passed a resolution which paves the way for the Islamic Conference’s measure against religio…– defined as linking Islamists to terrorism. At home Democrats have attached a “hate [...]

By: Mahdi Al-Dajjal

Mahdi Al-Dajjal — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:03:56 +0000

There are those of us who said this kind of thing (efforts to stifle criticism of islam) from an Obama Administration wouldn't be too far off the horizon once he got elected. Appears we were right in this regard.

By: Armigerous

Armigerous — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:41:51 +0000

So under this resolution,if I were to say that 'mohammed' was a mass murdering pedophile whose mother wore kosher panties and rode shotgun on the garbage wagon in Medina,I could be what?..fined?..sent to prison?…or a 'sensitivity and reeducation camp' until I am coerced into apologizing?….note to self: buy more ammo at Wal-Mart next weekend.

By: MaryAnn

MaryAnn — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:33:29 +0000

Bubba4, are you unaware of the pressures being put on governments concerning Islam? The Danish cartoon fiasco is only one example; there are many. Authors whose books are denied publication, speakers who are denied their right to speak and who are charged with committing 'hate speech” for speaking incorrectly about Islam, and then are forced to spend thousands of dollars defending themselves. Not to mention the people who have been murdered for “disrespecting” Islam. For Mr. Obama to enshrine this behavior in so-called law is a direct attack on the first amendment freedom of speech protected by the American Constitition. Americans are forced to wonder where Mr. Obama's loyalties lie, and it appears they are not with American liberty.

By: USMCSniper

USMCSniper — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:20:50 +0000

God you are so stupid you don't even suspect you are stupid.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:17:59 +0000

Yeah, but that's not what he did…that's what FPM is implying is the going to be the future result in their bizaro world.

By: coyote3

coyote3 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:58:02 +0000

We, in this country, are free to defame religion, any religion, or not. It is none the president's business., any president.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:31:43 +0000

“This resolution appears to stem from, and constitute a step toward, the Organization of Islamic Conference’s resolution to “combat defamation of religions”

Sure it is….groan. Why not? State something true…then tell us what it REALLY means…thanks FPM for continually trying to undermine the country and the President with this kind of bullshit.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:24:35 +0000

I think you reside in another dimension.

By: USMCSniper

USMCSniper — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:39:04 +0000

Daniel Pipes has warned us. The hardest thing for Westerners to understand is not that a war with militant Islam is underway but that the nature of the enemy's ultimate goal. That goal is to apply the Islamic law (the Shari‘a) globally. In U.S. terms, it intends to replace the Constitution with the Qur'an.

This aspiration is so remote and far-fetched to many non-Muslims, it elicits more guffaws than apprehension. Of course, that used to be the same reaction in Europe, and now it's become widely accepted that, in Bernard Lewis' words, "Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century."

Because of the American skepticism about Islamist goals, I postponed publishing an article on this subject until immediately after 9/11, when I expected receptivity to the subject would be greater (it was published in November 2001 as "The Danger Within: Militant Islam in America"). I argued there that

The Muslim population in this country is not like any other group, for it includes within it a substantial body of people—many times more numerous than the agents of Osama bin Ladin—who share with the suicide hijackers a hatred of the United States and the desire, ultimately, to transform it into a nation living under the strictures of militant Islam.

The receptivity indeed was greater, but still the idea of an Islamist takeover remains unrecognized in establishment circles -- the U.S. government, the old media, the universities, the mainline churches.

By: tommanning

tommanning — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:36:51 +0000

At this time; Only Israel has the guts & fortitude to combat these crazy religious Muslims. It is only when we Americans are attacked with much force that we respond. Yet we have not the will to carry on a full fleiged war with the only choice -”IS TO WIN” ! You cannot fight a war with one hand tied behind your back. We could have already defeated them in Afganistan, & went on into Pakistan & bombed the hell out of them in their lawless areas. Who is Pakistan, to tell us, we can not pursue an enemy that is determined to “Kill Us” when we are sending much $ $ $ .

By: BobC

BobC — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:15:03 +0000

So, does this mean that the Arab world is going to stop defaming Judaism? Even if only in their official publications?

How can grownups tolerate this level of hypocrisy? Is everyone at the UN crazy?

By: clyde

clyde — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:04:28 +0000

lock n` load

By: brimp

brimp — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:24:52 +0000

I hope that the backlash that comes from the American people will cause a complete break with the United Nations (and all its subsidiaries). The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution is incompatible with the United Nations.