<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hold On, Big Labor &#8211; by Ben Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha K.</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-795547</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-795547</guid>
		<description>Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Opera. I&#039;m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I&#039;d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Opera. I&#8217;m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I&#8217;d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmy przygodowe</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-781973</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmy przygodowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-781973</guid>
		<description>you have got an amazing blog here! would you prefer to make some invite posts on my weblog? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have got an amazing blog here! would you prefer to make some invite posts on my weblog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vigrx plus</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-4878</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigrx plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-4878</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s good post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#39;s good post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antifascist18</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>antifascist18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>Methinks it is time American students had a right to choose their professors - and get rid of the indoctrinating Left Nazis like Becker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks it is time American students had a right to choose their professors &#8211; and get rid of the indoctrinating Left Nazis like Becker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote3</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>What is that go to do with it?  I have no problem with someone, or group of someones negotiating for health insurance, and if they do it becomes matter of contract law.  However, I am not going to be able to buy a house or life insurance without a job.  Does that mean an industry is required to provide me with a job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is that go to do with it?  I have no problem with someone, or group of someones negotiating for health insurance, and if they do it becomes matter of contract law.  However, I am not going to be able to buy a house or life insurance without a job.  Does that mean an industry is required to provide me with a job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diginess</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>diginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>Hey, I don&#039;t think anyone&#039;s arguing with you.  People should always have the choice to join a union or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I don&#39;t think anyone&#39;s arguing with you.  People should always have the choice to join a union or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diginess</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>diginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Fair enough on my ignorance of union operation.  You didn&#039;t respond to the other issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough on my ignorance of union operation.  You didn&#39;t respond to the other issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diginess</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>diginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>How are you going to get health insurance on your own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you going to get health insurance on your own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wargas</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you can afford to but do not pay for your workers (sic) health insurance, but instead leave them in the cold, you deserve to die a fiery death.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why stop at health insurance? If a business owner has enough money to pay for the workers&#039; food and clothes, and he chooses not to, should he also &quot;die a fiery death&quot;? What makes health insurance the specific responsibility of an employer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about life insurance? Housing? It is conceivable, for instance, that Donald Trump has enough money to buy each of his employees a great life insurance policy as well as a huge house. Regardless of whether he does these things (I&#039;m pretty sure he doesn&#039;t), should he die if he chooses not to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you can afford to but do not pay for your workers (sic) health insurance, but instead leave them in the cold, you deserve to die a fiery death.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why stop at health insurance? If a business owner has enough money to pay for the workers&#39; food and clothes, and he chooses not to, should he also &#8220;die a fiery death&#8221;? What makes health insurance the specific responsibility of an employer?</p>
<p>What about life insurance? Housing? It is conceivable, for instance, that Donald Trump has enough money to buy each of his employees a great life insurance policy as well as a huge house. Regardless of whether he does these things (I&#39;m pretty sure he doesn&#39;t), should he die if he chooses not to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wargas</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t seen a lot of background material on ACORN because you haven&#039;t bothered to read it. It&#039;s everywhere, including on &lt;a href=&quot;http://discoverthenetworks.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discoverthenetworks.org&lt;/a&gt;, which is another David Horowitz site. It&#039;s also well documented in Michelle Malkin&#039;s new book, and there are scores of articles on websites and in magazines about that group&#039;s extortionist past and present.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You claim that you only read this website &quot;for laughs,&quot; and yet you display no indication that you read anything else for intellectual purposes, judging by your ignorance of what unions are, how they operate, and why people are upset about ACORN in light of that group&#039;s sordid background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#39;t seen a lot of background material on ACORN because you haven&#39;t bothered to read it. It&#39;s everywhere, including on <a href="http://discoverthenetworks.org" rel="nofollow">discoverthenetworks.org</a>, which is another David Horowitz site. It&#39;s also well documented in Michelle Malkin&#39;s new book, and there are scores of articles on websites and in magazines about that group&#39;s extortionist past and present.</p>
<p>You claim that you only read this website &#8220;for laughs,&#8221; and yet you display no indication that you read anything else for intellectual purposes, judging by your ignorance of what unions are, how they operate, and why people are upset about ACORN in light of that group&#39;s sordid background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wargas</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>According to Becker&#039;s logic, since we don&#039;t have a choice whether we should have congressional representatives &quot;bargaining&quot; for us, so we shouldn&#039;t have a choice whether we have union reps doing the same. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But why stop there? Why not take this logic even further? Why should we have a choice as to what food we eat, what clothes we wear, or what neighborhood we live in? Why shouldn&#039;t we have a &quot;bargaining&quot; rep to protect us from the evil food vendor, the malicious clothing salesman, and the greedy real estate speculator?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about marriage? There are those who have trouble initiating sexual relationships with others, so maybe we could all be assigned (against our will, of course) a union rep who will bargain for sex and marriage with others (who will be forced to comply, as per union-style &quot;bargaining&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Becker&#39;s logic, since we don&#39;t have a choice whether we should have congressional representatives &#8220;bargaining&#8221; for us, so we shouldn&#39;t have a choice whether we have union reps doing the same. </p>
<p>But why stop there? Why not take this logic even further? Why should we have a choice as to what food we eat, what clothes we wear, or what neighborhood we live in? Why shouldn&#39;t we have a &#8220;bargaining&#8221; rep to protect us from the evil food vendor, the malicious clothing salesman, and the greedy real estate speculator?</p>
<p>What about marriage? There are those who have trouble initiating sexual relationships with others, so maybe we could all be assigned (against our will, of course) a union rep who will bargain for sex and marriage with others (who will be forced to comply, as per union-style &#8220;bargaining&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wargas</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2649</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2649</guid>
		<description>The rhetoric of unions is pure Marxism. In the world of Big Labor, there is always a bad guy and that bad guy is always the lazy, rich employer; there is always a good guy, too, and that good guy is always the tenacious, selfless worker. Translated into Marxian terms, the bourgeoisie is a feckless ruling class that will ALWAYS extract something from the lower classes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This neat dichotomy is not specific to the labor Left. The same type of paranoid conspiracism can be found in Nazism (Aryans vs Jews), radical feminism (woman vs men), radical race theory (minorities vs whites), etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rhetoric of unions is pure Marxism. In the world of Big Labor, there is always a bad guy and that bad guy is always the lazy, rich employer; there is always a good guy, too, and that good guy is always the tenacious, selfless worker. Translated into Marxian terms, the bourgeoisie is a feckless ruling class that will ALWAYS extract something from the lower classes.</p>
<p>This neat dichotomy is not specific to the labor Left. The same type of paranoid conspiracism can be found in Nazism (Aryans vs Jews), radical feminism (woman vs men), radical race theory (minorities vs whites), etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vancelong1433</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>vancelong1433</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeroturf.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;San Diego Synthetic Turf&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zeroturf.com/" rel="nofollow">San Diego Synthetic Turf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote3</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>You are hallucinating? Government, in this county is already oppressive to business. As far as insurance for employees is concerned, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are hallucinating? Government, in this county is already oppressive to business. As far as insurance for employees is concerned, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diginess</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>diginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing a lot about ACORN, but not a lot of actual background material.  I take it that unions are some of your biggest opposition as a Republican party permanent member.  Personally, I&#039;ve only read this site for a little while (for laughs, don&#039;t take you too seriously), but let me contrast union members to large defense contractors.  Isn&#039;t it the same thing?  Especially when you have a VP who owns a major share in one of the biggest of them, and the money all being funneled toward a few groups.  Where was the outrage then?  Your outrage is completely disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m seeing a lot about ACORN, but not a lot of actual background material.  I take it that unions are some of your biggest opposition as a Republican party permanent member.  Personally, I&#39;ve only read this site for a little while (for laughs, don&#39;t take you too seriously), but let me contrast union members to large defense contractors.  Isn&#39;t it the same thing?  Especially when you have a VP who owns a major share in one of the biggest of them, and the money all being funneled toward a few groups.  Where was the outrage then?  Your outrage is completely disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diginess</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>diginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>The jobs aren&#039;t coming back because someone in China, Mexico, or India can and will do it for cheaper.  To say they will never come back is probably false though.  Eventually our living standards and those of the growing countries will start to equalize and those workers will start to expect more as well.  When that happens, our governments together will probably start to form more restrictive laws on exodus of corporations, or corporate HQ located in country with workers overseas.  We can also do a lot to close tax evasion loopholes.&lt;br&gt;That being said, you do have a point in that you can&#039;t dictate your salary over the concerns of the customer.  However, at the same time it doesn&#039;t make any sense to have that high of a discrepancy between the workers and CEO pay.&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, if you can&#039;t take care of your workers and give them a decent salary, you probably don&#039;t deserve to be in business.  If you can afford to but do not pay for your workers health insurance, but instead leave them in the cold, you deserve to die a fiery death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jobs aren&#39;t coming back because someone in China, Mexico, or India can and will do it for cheaper.  To say they will never come back is probably false though.  Eventually our living standards and those of the growing countries will start to equalize and those workers will start to expect more as well.  When that happens, our governments together will probably start to form more restrictive laws on exodus of corporations, or corporate HQ located in country with workers overseas.  We can also do a lot to close tax evasion loopholes.<br />That being said, you do have a point in that you can&#39;t dictate your salary over the concerns of the customer.  However, at the same time it doesn&#39;t make any sense to have that high of a discrepancy between the workers and CEO pay.<br />Furthermore, if you can&#39;t take care of your workers and give them a decent salary, you probably don&#39;t deserve to be in business.  If you can afford to but do not pay for your workers health insurance, but instead leave them in the cold, you deserve to die a fiery death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MizPris</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>MizPris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>The main pupose for politicians like those in the Democrat Party, and like those on the far left, specifically, is, a union is easier to organize in one&#039;s favor and keep them there. They only need to deal with the union leaders, rather than individual citizens  when looking for political contributions, or some heft with which to lean on whichever industry including financial institutions, is &quot;off the political plantation&quot;, at the moment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a simple &quot;you scratch my back and I&#039;ll scratch yours&quot; scenario. And folks, due to the bailouts and stimulus packages, unions got payback big time for their millions in contributions, and their muscular backing. Unions like SEIU and others, and their close associates ACORN, were handsomely rewarded for their work and/or money in getting Obama elected. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That money, and favorable treatment was paid for with your money and mine. The Thugocracy at it&#039;s best. Grifters of the first order, and it all translates into power. Power organizing, if you will.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A side note here. We all heard that Congress defunded ACORN right? Well they did. For a month. As of October 31st, ACORN is back in the government chips once again. Oh, by the way, that&#039;s our money too!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trick or Treat!!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll bet not a few politicians and ACORN dupes got a laugh over that. Yep, they sure pulled the wool over our eyes huh? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, hey, for the liberals here, aren&#039;t you proud? Don&#039;t you love these people who rob from you and give to their thugs? They demonstrate time and time again that they care nothing for the American people including you, unless of course you work in their campaign then they&#039;ll care about you. Until, that is, the campaign is over. But, don&#039;t worry, they&#039;ll be back for more, the next election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this ladies and gentlemen is why unions are important. Not for the workers, but for political power. The workers are mere suckers who have chosen three masters instead of one which would be their employer. The other two are the union leaders, and ultimately, the politicians who hold the real power to give or take away as they see fit. At least in this case, as long as they are elected and in control. As now.&lt;br&gt;Pris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main pupose for politicians like those in the Democrat Party, and like those on the far left, specifically, is, a union is easier to organize in one&#39;s favor and keep them there. They only need to deal with the union leaders, rather than individual citizens  when looking for political contributions, or some heft with which to lean on whichever industry including financial institutions, is &#8220;off the political plantation&#8221;, at the moment.</p>
<p>It&#39;s a simple &#8220;you scratch my back and I&#39;ll scratch yours&#8221; scenario. And folks, due to the bailouts and stimulus packages, unions got payback big time for their millions in contributions, and their muscular backing. Unions like SEIU and others, and their close associates ACORN, were handsomely rewarded for their work and/or money in getting Obama elected. </p>
<p>That money, and favorable treatment was paid for with your money and mine. The Thugocracy at it&#39;s best. Grifters of the first order, and it all translates into power. Power organizing, if you will.</p>
<p>A side note here. We all heard that Congress defunded ACORN right? Well they did. For a month. As of October 31st, ACORN is back in the government chips once again. Oh, by the way, that&#39;s our money too!</p>
<p>Trick or Treat!!! </p>
<p>I&#39;ll bet not a few politicians and ACORN dupes got a laugh over that. Yep, they sure pulled the wool over our eyes huh? </p>
<p>But, hey, for the liberals here, aren&#39;t you proud? Don&#39;t you love these people who rob from you and give to their thugs? They demonstrate time and time again that they care nothing for the American people including you, unless of course you work in their campaign then they&#39;ll care about you. Until, that is, the campaign is over. But, don&#39;t worry, they&#39;ll be back for more, the next election.</p>
<p>And this ladies and gentlemen is why unions are important. Not for the workers, but for political power. The workers are mere suckers who have chosen three masters instead of one which would be their employer. The other two are the union leaders, and ultimately, the politicians who hold the real power to give or take away as they see fit. At least in this case, as long as they are elected and in control. As now.<br />Pris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilByler</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilByler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>John McCain&#039;s record this year is conservative and as good as any.  McCain voted AGAINST every Obama bailout bill.  McCain voted AGAINST every Obama deficit spending bill, denouncing the multi-trillion dollar deficit spending as &quot;generational theft,&quot; a phrase thereafter used by Sean Hannity and more recently by Rush Limbaugh.  McCain voted AGAINST the confirmations of tax cheat Geithner, radical pro-abortion advocate Sebellius, leftist Kagan and transnational legal theorist Koh to their respective positions in the Obama Administration.  McCain voted AGAINST the confirmation of Sotomayer to the U.S. Supreme Court.  McCain’s OPPOSITION to ObamaCare has been so vociferous that the New York Times has accused McCain of “throwing bombs” on the subject.  McCain has also announced that he is opposed to this year’s Democrat cap and trade bill.  McCain now has put a hold on SEIU&#039;s Becker and has introduced legislation to stop the Government takeover of the internet in anme of net neutrality.  McCain deserves some credit.  And I have not reminded us all that he was the one who brought Sarah Palin to the limelight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain&#39;s record this year is conservative and as good as any.  McCain voted AGAINST every Obama bailout bill.  McCain voted AGAINST every Obama deficit spending bill, denouncing the multi-trillion dollar deficit spending as &#8220;generational theft,&#8221; a phrase thereafter used by Sean Hannity and more recently by Rush Limbaugh.  McCain voted AGAINST the confirmations of tax cheat Geithner, radical pro-abortion advocate Sebellius, leftist Kagan and transnational legal theorist Koh to their respective positions in the Obama Administration.  McCain voted AGAINST the confirmation of Sotomayer to the U.S. Supreme Court.  McCain’s OPPOSITION to ObamaCare has been so vociferous that the New York Times has accused McCain of “throwing bombs” on the subject.  McCain has also announced that he is opposed to this year’s Democrat cap and trade bill.  McCain now has put a hold on SEIU&#39;s Becker and has introduced legislation to stop the Government takeover of the internet in anme of net neutrality.  McCain deserves some credit.  And I have not reminded us all that he was the one who brought Sarah Palin to the limelight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote3</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>I recall when I was hired.  Although, the area where I live and worked, is not known for being a high wage, or highly unionized area, many people laughed when they learned of my salary and hours (then no overtime pay).  They even laughed at my insurance.  About the only thing I really had over them was the pension, but we were young, at the time, and nobody really cared about that.  Many of these people were union employees in the private sector.  They made fun of my job, and thought it was funny that I would go to school, while working, what for?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was then, this is now.  Many of the jobs these people had no longer exist, and those laid off are working in other industries, for reduced wage/benefits.  Those left, have had to take major wage/benefit concessions.  I could still be working my job if I wanted to.  No one is laughing anymore.  Their unions failed to do anything about job security, when times were good, and they the chance to do.  Raises of multiple dollars per hour, strict work rules, and extended vacations only benefit you, &quot;if&quot; you have the job.  No one is laughing anymore.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact is, the workplace has changed.  Unions are trying to organize employees that there unions had nothing to do with in terms of a trade.  Unions are certainly not &quot;bad&quot;, but like any other organization that came about because of a need, much of that &quot;need&quot; has disappeared.   They only interested in these non traditional workers, &quot;now&quot;, because they have seen their membership decrease by attrition, and regardless of the reasons for it, those jobs are not coming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall when I was hired.  Although, the area where I live and worked, is not known for being a high wage, or highly unionized area, many people laughed when they learned of my salary and hours (then no overtime pay).  They even laughed at my insurance.  About the only thing I really had over them was the pension, but we were young, at the time, and nobody really cared about that.  Many of these people were union employees in the private sector.  They made fun of my job, and thought it was funny that I would go to school, while working, what for?</p>
<p>That was then, this is now.  Many of the jobs these people had no longer exist, and those laid off are working in other industries, for reduced wage/benefits.  Those left, have had to take major wage/benefit concessions.  I could still be working my job if I wanted to.  No one is laughing anymore.  Their unions failed to do anything about job security, when times were good, and they the chance to do.  Raises of multiple dollars per hour, strict work rules, and extended vacations only benefit you, &#8220;if&#8221; you have the job.  No one is laughing anymore.  </p>
<p>The fact is, the workplace has changed.  Unions are trying to organize employees that there unions had nothing to do with in terms of a trade.  Unions are certainly not &#8220;bad&#8221;, but like any other organization that came about because of a need, much of that &#8220;need&#8221; has disappeared.   They only interested in these non traditional workers, &#8220;now&#8221;, because they have seen their membership decrease by attrition, and regardless of the reasons for it, those jobs are not coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carterthewriter</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/23/hold-on-big-labor-by-ben-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Carterthewriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=32150#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>Long ago, the big labor unions exposed themselves as just another organization collecting money from its workers and building bureaucratic entities that provided no security for their membership only for their leadership. Their attitude mirrors that of the present government entity which they align themselves with in a final attempt to gain notoriety.&lt;br&gt;If you want another deduction added to your paycheck similar to Medicare and Social Security, the results of that forced expenditure only serve to fill the pockets of administrators who could care less where the money came from nor if it was used for the purpose it was originally withdrawn for.&lt;br&gt;Many can be seen sitting in front row seats at sporting events, frolliking with younger women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long ago, the big labor unions exposed themselves as just another organization collecting money from its workers and building bureaucratic entities that provided no security for their membership only for their leadership. Their attitude mirrors that of the present government entity which they align themselves with in a final attempt to gain notoriety.<br />If you want another deduction added to your paycheck similar to Medicare and Social Security, the results of that forced expenditure only serve to fill the pockets of administrators who could care less where the money came from nor if it was used for the purpose it was originally withdrawn for.<br />Many can be seen sitting in front row seats at sporting events, frolliking with younger women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

