~~What is the best economic solution to this problem that will directly benefit the U.S. in the most possilble and credible way?~~

When taking that statement into consideration Sam, do you really think your opinion of who is a coward and who is stupid really plays into their formula?
=============================================
Here, you are direct, and your question is the most clear.

I'll try to make an answer at the level of your crystal clear question.

Well, if we take the economic priorities the axis of the spin, I would say that, Ignoring the threat of the Islamism terrorism which is orchestrated by the religious regime of Iran from 30 years ago till now had already cost only to USA at least trillion of USD$ and you will continue to pay(you the Americans by your taxes) for the coming years.

If this makes sense to you, I'll try to open this subject and discuss on detail the element and parameters that build this answer(to your question).

I don't know what to say to you except that my country apparantly dosn''t agree with you on how to solve Iran's nuclear ambitions.

If you are so up to speed to solving this problem how would you solve it?

Now don't forget to stay within the guildlines of the protocol for a U.N. resolution.

We have to learn to play with others and that is why we created the U.N. — everyone thinks they are right including the Nazi's so don't put yourself on a pedistool.

Another thing to keep in mind, my country doesn't necessarily have the same priorities as you do. Bush or Obama don''t lose much sleep thinking about how to appease your personal preferences and to take into consideration your own personal tragedies.

Obama, as well as Bush, are probably thinking about a combination of things but I can tell you what is exactly in the forefront of theirs minds:

~~What is the best economic solution to this problem that will directly benefit the U.S. in the most possilble and credible way?~~

When taking that statement into consideration Sam, do you really think your opinion of who is a coward and who is stupid really plays into their formula?

Answer the question Sam — just answer the question directly and I will take into consideration of what you have to say after that.

USA has failed in his past and continue his failure by negotiating with the most dangerous regime of the world in spite of the the popular uprising of the Iranians who reject this regime.

Your Obama is wasting your credibility by negotiating with a regime that is rejected by his people, if you understand this situation, you will feel how shameful is your Obama's posture.

Bush failed his war, he targeted nothing, and he was persisting that he makes his war against the terror,

BUT, OBAMA shouted “HANDS UP” against the Nuclear threat of a Islamo-Fascism.

Which one you prefer?
The one who was stupid?
Or the one who delivers your nation to Ahmadinejad?

At least, BUSH never reduced himself and his nation at the level of Ahmadinejad.

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii
for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now. He dictated this letter to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

Consult : http://xrl.us/bgeewc

Something Bush clearly couldn't do.

One month ago UN and US labeled the Ballochi Resistance Terrorist because they bombed and killed 13 high commanders of the passdarans.

Those 13 Passdarans commanders were the responsible of the repressions of the people during the last 3 months.

This is the way how USA Administrations back actively the Mullahs regime of Iran.