NO PEACE ON EARTH UNTIL ALL MUSLIMS GLOW IN THE DATK!!!

Muslim stoning:
http://thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/stoni…

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace
“He who fights that Islam should be superior fights in Allah's cause”
Muhammad, prophet of Islam

2009.12.19 (Narathiwat, Thailand) – Three Buddhists are incinerated when Muslim insurgents blow up a gas tank next to their truck.
2009.12.18 (Haripur, Pakistan) – A man and his wife are among three killed in their home by suspected Islamic hardliners.
2009.12.18 (Pulwama, India) – Two people are dragged from their homes and murdered by Mujahideen.
2009.12.18 (Sulaimaniyah, Iraq) – A civilian is gunned down on his doorstep by Muslim terrorists.
2009.12.18 (Mogadishu, Somalia) – Two civilians are killed when a mortar fired by suspected Islamic militia strikes a house.
2009.12.18 (Lower Dir, Pakistan) – Children are among fifteen people blown to bits a mosque by a Shahid suicide bomber.

January 24,2008

I haven't read Jacob Heilbrunn's book on the neocons yet, but I'm not sure I need to after seeing Philip Weiss's review. Weiss's review makes it clear that Heilbrunn's book corroborates several of the themes in my writing on the neocons and on Jewish intellectual and political movements generally.

First, neoconservatism is a Jewish movement. That should have been clear to everyone by now, but references to the Jewish basis of the movement have been noticeably missing from much of the mainstream media, to the point that Bill Kristol was introduced as a columnist at the New York Times as simply a “conservative.” This is critical because the neocons have now become the conservative establishment. When Kristol (or Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity) hold forth at Fox News, most people have no idea that they are tuning into the public face of a fundamentally Jewish movement that elbowed out more traditional conservatives.

Secondly, Jewish neocons not only have a strong Jewish identity, they also have strong Jewish interests. This is obvious from their involvement in pro-Israel activism, their personal relationships with Israeli leaders, and close ties with other Jews and with the wider Jewish community. In fact, I have argued that the neocons are more strongly identified as Jews than the mainstream liberal/left Jews — that the neocons form the vanguard of the Jewish community. After all, neocons were the first segment of the Jewish community to strongly condemn the USSR, both for its domestic anti-Semitism and for its alliances with Arab governments. Prominent neocons like Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz began their political careers by making alliances with Cold War hawks like Henry Jackson This was at a time when the Jewish left was prominently involved in defending the USSR, apparently blind to the fact that the status of Jews as an elite in the USSR had changed greatly following World War II.

And the neocons are notorious for their strong ties to the most extreme racialist and nationalist segments of Israeli society — elements that the mainstream liberal/left Jewish community probably wishes would disappear or at least be less visible. (Hence the uproar over Christiane Amanpour's God's Jewish Warriors.) Indeed, the Jewish liberal/left has a huge blind spot, continuing to pursue its leftist multicultural agenda in the U.S. while ignoring the fact that the organized Jewish community is deeply complicit in dispossessing the Palestinians and erecting a racialist, apartheid state in Israel. As Weiss has noted elsewhere, “Steve Rabinowitz, Clinton friend, told me this year that if anyone did a study of how much [Democrat] money comes from Jews, it would fuel conspiracy theories.” The Jewish liberal/left lavishly supports Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, but makes no attempt to wrest control of the pro-Israel lobby from the hands of what James Petras terms the “reactionary minority of American Jews” who head the major American Jewish organizations.

But more interestingly, Heilbrunn points to the “lifelong antipathy toward the patrician class among the neocons … [that] prompted them to create their own parallel establishment.” In this regard, the neocons are entirely within the American Jewish mainstream. As I noted in a previous blog (also commenting on Philip Weiss), “Jews have become an elite, but an elite that does not identify with its subjects — a hostile, estranged but very wealthy elite that still sees themselves as outsiders.” And along with the American Jewish mainstream, the neocons have been vital players in the establishment of a variety of policies opposed to the interests and attitudes of the American majority, most egregiously unrestricted immigration which has successfully altered the ethnic composition of the country. Indeed, neoconservative Ben Wattenberg famously wrote that “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.”

This hostility toward the traditional peoples and culture of America among people calling themselves conservatives is striking — the antithesis of normal and natural conservative tendencies. As Sam Francis noted, what the neocons dislike about traditional conservatives is simply that they “are conservative at all”:

There are countless stories of how neoconservatives have succeeded in entering conservative institutions, forcing out or demoting traditional conservatives, and changing the positions and philosophy of such institutions in neoconservative directions…. Writers like M. E. Bradford, Joseph Sobran, Pat Buchanan, and Russell Kirk, and institutions like Chronicles, the Rockford Institute, the Philadelphia Society, and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute have been among the most respected and distinguished names in American conservatism. The dedication of their neoconservative enemies to driving them out of the movement they have taken over and demonizing them as marginal and dangerous figures has no legitimate basis in reality. It is clear evidence of the ulterior aspirations of those behind neoconservatism to dominate and subvert American conservatism from its original purposes and agenda and turn it to other purposes…. What neoconservatives really dislike about their “allies” among traditional conservatives is simply the fact that the conservatives are conservatives at all—that they support “this notion of a Christian civilization,” as Midge Decter put it, that they oppose mass immigration, … that they entertain doubts or strong disagreement over American foreign policy in the Middle East, that they oppose reckless involvement in foreign wars and foreign entanglements, and that, in company with the Founding Fathers of the United States, they reject the concept of a pure democracy and the belief that the United States is or should evolve toward it.

Francis, S. (2004). The neoconservative subversion. In B. Nelson (ed.), “Neoconservatism.” Occasional Papers of the Conservative Citizens’ Foundation, Issue Number Six, 6–12. St. Louis: Conservative Citizens’ Foundation, p. 9.

That the New York Times can call Kristol a conservative without shame or irony is a striking commentary on the death of American conservatism.

Rest of article
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog-Heilbrunn.htm

Hmm, I wonder why nobody says that in the mainstream media.

BECAUSE THEY ARE!!!

Tehran's hospitals are filled with dying little girls,
victims of their muslim parents or neighbors.

Muslims are not humans, not animals or insects.
They are not even toxic vegetals, they are viruses
spawned from hell or from outer space!

Study Islam's history free with the Historyscoper and see what Persia could have been at http://go.to/islamhistory

And introduced every other form of terrorism (except suicide-bombing) to the Middle-Eastern.

First use of bombs in cafes, 1937, buses 1937, drive-by terror shootings 1937/38 and 47/48 (Morris, Righteous Victims, p681.), market-place, 1938, ship 1940, over 200 Jews killed by Stern Gang, hotel 1946 (92 dead, terrorist goes on to be Israeli Prime Minister), suitcase bombing 1946, ambulance-mining 1946, car-bomb 1946, letter-bomb 1947 (in London), parcel bomb 1947 (London), reprisal murder of hostages 1947, truck-bomb 1948.

Use of biological weapons 1948 and world's first and by far the most credible nuclear threats.