Comments on: Eurabia vs. Israel on Jerusalem – by P. David Hornik

By: Aloysius

Aloysius — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:18:16 +0000

Jerusalem and Israel is in great danger, One day the invasion will happen ; many armies
under UN banner and led by a new German dictator. Yeshua propheised that
Jerusalem would be surrounded by armies (Luke 21). Yeshua or Jesus is the
Promised Messiah, He was a Jew and did not have long hair and was not
born on Christmas, He existed from eternity with God before His
incarnation. May all Jews and Isrealis and the House of Jacob repent from their sins
and from their love of evil things before ASTONISHING DESTRUCTION
COMES UPON THEM from the end-time King of Assyra, who will have no qualms using
weapons of mass destrruction

By: elgee

elgee — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:07:35 +0000

Arabism is racism! see: http://pan-arabism.blogspot.com The wild racist virus on a vicious campaign of burning all non-Arab ethnicities down, main victims include: Kurds, Jews (not just in Israel), Berbers (the indigenous of N. Africa), Persians, Assyrians, Asians, Africans (not just in Sudan genocide), Nubians (indigenous in Egypt), Copts, etc.

By: EURABIA VS. ISRAEL ON JERUSALEM: P.DAVID HORNIK | RUTHFULLY YOURS

EURABIA VS. ISRAEL ON JERUSALEM: P.DAVID HORNIK | RUTHFULLY YOURS — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 05:06:34 +0000

[...] to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/21/eurabia-vs-israel-on-jerusalem-by-p-david-hornik/ AKPC_IDS += "1807,";Popularity: 1% [?] Posted December 21, 2009 by Ruth King. Comments and [...]

By: Kerry Winn

Kerry Winn — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:31:43 +0000

Do not really agree, because in most of Europe Holocaust Denial is a crime. Most of the concentration camps are preserved with taxes to remind themselves “Never Again.”

However, the rise in violent antiJewish crimes is a very bad indicator for European Jews.

By: Lemac the cameL

Lemac the cameL — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:43:37 +0000

First of all, Catherine Ashton can just take her unsolicited positions on Jerusalem and shove them all the way back up her camel butt where they belong.
As for David H's portrayal of the “nice, well intergrated ” izlamic communities of the Old Arab section of Jerusalem, this is nothing to crow about. This only provides a showcase for the Euro-loonies to continue promoting their John Lennon “imagine” fantasy vision of Europe. The arab community in Jersusalem and elsewhere in Israel is a fifth column that can explode in your face at any time……allah!
QUESTION: IF PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, WILL THE ISRAELI MOZLEM SUPPORT ISRAEL, IE THE JEWISH STATE OR THE UMMAH AND THE MINIONS OF ALLAH?
Even our president, the fraud king Hussein oumgbama, has stated that in a crisis he will side with izam.

Enjoy your stay in dar al harb while it lasts…….allah !

By: LucyQ

LucyQ — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:35:34 +0000

Europeans kiss up to Arabs not only because of their oil fix but because they're still trying 'to get' the Jews. Euros think if they bond in hatred with Arabs toward Israel that they will be loved by Arabs. Obviously, this sort of thing that passes for logic these days has more faults than a CA earthquake.

By: LucyQ

LucyQ — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:28:24 +0000

The EU and indeed, many Americans have trouble recognizing the fact that their God, Jesus Christ, was born in Israel, chose to become a rabbi whom the Hebrew children loved, and loved and believed the Original Testament.

By: aspacia

aspacia — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:42:19 +0000

dikehopper,

Why not Jerusalem? I am a Deist, however Muslims already have two religious sites, and a huge land mass. Jews and Christians deserve at least 1 religious site, and both were disallowed entry into East Jerusalem until 1967. Jews allow both Christians and Muslims entry into this area. Muslims are hypocrites, and you know it, just look at the persecution or Copts in Egypt, and the disallowence of nonMuslims into Saudi Arabia.

By: compwar

compwar — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:03:06 +0000

“The difference is that Judaism does not recognize Jesus as divine, only as a rabbi” Jesus was never a rabbi, in fact that was part of the gospels (New Testament) the religous leaders rejected him.

By: Dikehopper

Dikehopper — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:57:34 +0000

aspacia and Sniper – I noticed that neither of you disagreed with anything I said. Thank you. (Sorry, couldn't help that.) But seriously, in case you assumed otherwise, I am a super hawk in defense of Israel against its enemies, ever since 1967. I've urged others to write their Congressmen in support of Israel, donated money for equipment for the IDF, always supported military occupation of the Territories, etc, etc, etc. But I've always strongly disagreed with Israel on Jerusalem and the isolated settlements (always supported the “large settlement blocs” along the Green Line). I think they've been a serious mistake, have only done damage to Israel. And Hornik is a good guy, but it's probably fair to call his position on this one subject “fringe.” Anyway, you two and I probably agree on about everything else. If we met, we would probably part as friends, just disagree on this one subject. For what its worth. In case our paths cross again.

By: USMCSniper

USMCSniper — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:11:01 +0000

It's not about who Jerusalem should belong to. It's about who it actually belongs to and that would be the Jews. This is a non-argument, no-brainer. Once again muslims are demanding something that they have no claims to and no rights to. Jewish claims to Jerusalem are based on universally accepted, well documented HISTORICAL FACTS. They are based on SOLID EVIDENCE. The Arab or Muslim claims are based imaginary fantasies, and also on plain outright lies.

It is useless to try to bother to debate the Arab/Muslim with historical facts because there is not a legitimate basis for a debate.

By: aspacia

aspacia — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:48:00 +0000

You are jumping on the bandwagon Dikehopper. Europe is very antiJewish, if not the Holocaust would not have happened. Hitler was elected by popular vote, did that fact make it right. Hamas was elected by popular vote, is this correct? Basically, Europans kiss up to Arabs, not out a sense of justice, but a sense of their oil fix, just as Bush, and other U.S. politiicians do.

By: aspacia

aspacia — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:35:39 +0000

The terminology refers to the Biblical Old Testament and the New Testament, and it absolutely correct. The Torah is similar to the Old Testament, however some of the language differs.

The difference is that Judaism does not recognize Jesus as divine, only as a rabbi.

By: Dikehopper

Dikehopper — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:14:25 +0000

The rest of the world does not seem to recognize Israel's claims to Jerusalem (or agree with the author). That is why no country on Earth has its embassy in Jerusalem. No U.S. president has recognized Israel's claims to Jerusalem. The U.S. has butted heads with Israel over this subject since, I believe it was 1952.

By: Edward Durfee

Edward Durfee — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:26:19 +0000

History repeats itself, as the Moslems again are attempting to conquer the world. It was in 100 that they were pushed back to Medina and Mecca, when are we going to wake up and start to push them back again? Are we to just sit by while they conquer the world as we know it? I think not. Wake up to the reality of what is at hand. Do not be fooled into to believing that “regilious freedom” will allow tolerance. It is in our face and the time is know to stop it in its tracks.

By: Robert Bernier

Robert Bernier — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:21:02 +0000

Jerusalem has always been the symbol of Jewish unity.
Only twice in Jerusalem's history has it served as a national capital. The first time was as the capital of the two Jewish Commonwealths during the First and Second Temple periods, as described in the Bible, reinforced by archaeological evidence and numerous ancient documents. The second time is in modern times as the capital of the State of Israel. It has never served as an Arab capital for the simple reason that there has never been a Palestinian Arab state. More about Jerusalem at : http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2007/12...

By: Robert Bernier

Robert Bernier — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:18:13 +0000

Jeusalem is Jewish as London is British and Paris is French, and should not be up for negotiation .
The true demographic threat in Jerusalem is the freezing of Jewish building and the limitations placed on the natural growth of the capital by diplomatic initiatives, unless you expand the border of Jerusalem, including Arab neighborhoods – you wont have the area required to allow Jerusalem to expand. In order for Jerusalem to bloom and expand it should remain Jewish and entirely under Israeli sovereignty. Jerusalem should not be up
for negotiation, it has always been the symbol of Jewish unity as explained at :
http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2007/12...

By: Renovator

Renovator — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:12:30 +0000

Why do you undermine your argument?

Do you think European Christians would take you seriously if you had concluded "the EU, after decades of forsaking its Messianic-Jewish roots for pro-Arabism…"???

"Judeo" is a combinative form that implies it is dependent upon, and an intrinsic part of, something else. To presume that Judaism is merely a part of Christianity is not only offensive, it is a conspicuous falsehood that undermines your entire argument. Why do you use such a self-defeating phrase?

Both Jewish and Christian Europeans have a deeply-felt recognition that Christianity is separate from Judaism and, consequently, there is no such thing as Judeo-Christian. Thus, after having built to your conclusion, instead of a powerful climax your use of that phrase popped your balloon.

Use the phrase "Judaic and Christian" (roots, traditions, values, etc.), which doesn't imply any convergence of the two. Of course, Islam also shares some roots, traditions, values, etc. with Judaism as well. However, confronting that reality forces even more careful thought. Perhaps "Judaic and Christian" roots must be compared and contrasted with "Judaic and Islamic" roots… then how does Christianity relate other than a fellow supersessory and displacement theology to Islam?