SUBSCRIBE:
Email RSS Facebook Twitter

The Lies of Obama

Posted by John Ellis on Jan 21st, 2010 and filed under FrontPage. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

  • A A A
  • Obamal

    When politicians are caught out in lies, their supporters often resort to the old cliché: all politicians lie. But that is itself a lie: most don’t. Even among those who do, there are enormous differences in the importance and frequency of the lies. And it is surely now clear that this nation has a far from routine problem in the scale and regularity of President Obama’s lying.

    When politicians lie they are usually trying to avoid political damage, or to make themselves look good. Bill Clinton lied (and got himself impeached) to save himself from embarrassment about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Hillary Clinton lied about being under fire in Bosnia to enhance her non-existent foreign affairs profile. Richard Nixon was forced from office because he lied to cover up his involvement in a political dirty trick. John Kerry lied about his Vietnam combat experience to blunt his anti-military reputation. But Barack Obama’s lies are far more corrosive and destructive, because they go the heart of legislation and governance, and so seriously undermine trust in government. His lies generally take a specific form: they attempt to persuade people to vote for him or his policies by categorically assuring them that they need not have the anxieties that they have been expressing. The lies say, essentially: trust me, support what I want, and I promise that what you fear will never happen. But in every case it soon becomes clear either that he knew perfectly well that what the public feared would in fact happen, or that he was giving a firm assurance that he was in no position to give, or that he had no intention of following through on his promise.

    The accumulated weight of Obama’s deceit is overwhelming:

    * During his campaign for the presidency and since, Obama repeatedly assured us that he would protect Medicare against cuts; but he now presses for passage of bills that include savage cuts in Medicare.

    * To obtain passage of his first stimulus bill, Obama assured us that 90% of the jobs created would be in the private sector; but as he well knew, most of them were to be in the public sector.

    * Early in the health care debate, Obama assured us that he had not said that he favored a single payer system; but he was on record as having said exactly that.

    * Obama gave primary voters a firm assurance that if he became the nominee of the Democratic party he would (unlike Hillary Clinton) abide by the campaign finance limits of public funding; but as soon as he became the party’s nominee, he reneged on that pledge.

    * During the presidential campaign Obama criticized the presence of former lobbyists in the Bush administration and solemnly assured us that he would appoint no lobbyists to his administration; but once elected he proceeded to appoint even more lobbyists than his predecessors.

    * Obama criticized the size of George Bush’s deficit and promised to stop deficit spending if elected; but he has already quadrupled the size of the deficit he objected to and recklessly continues new federal spending in the trillions.

    * When campaigning Obama criticized bills before the congress that were too long for anyone to be able to read and promised to stop that; but the bills he has been backing throughout his first year are infinitely longer (2000+ pages) than the ones he criticized.

    * Candidate Obama promised an end to the corruption of earmarks and pork, but in the bills he has supported this year there have been more and bigger earmarks than ever before.

    * Candidate Obama promised us that CIA personnel involved in the interrogation of terrorists would not be prosecuted; but his administration is now doing exactly that.

    * Obama assured a joint session of Congress that the health bill he supported (pre-Stupak) would not provide public funding for abortions; but bitter resistance on the part of House Democrats to inclusion of language to that effect soon proved that it did.

    * Candidate Obama promised that he would make sure that there was always enough time for the public to read legislation before it was enacted; but he has done exactly the opposite, repeatedly pressing for even faster passage of even longer bills.

    * Candidate Obama met fears that he would be a tax and spend liberal by promising, emphatically and repeatedly, that those earning under $200,000 would see no increase in their taxes of any kind; but he now urges passage of a healthcare bill that breaks that pledge in many different ways, and his unrestrained increase in federal spending makes more tax increases inevitable.

    * Candidate Obama promised bipartisanship and an end to partisan bickering; but  in a display of especially ruthless partisanship his allies have shut Republicans out of all key meetings on his health care initiative, with the unprecedented result that domestic legislation of historic importance garnered not a single Republican vote in the Senate.

    * Candidate Obama criticized his opponent’s plan to tax employer paid healthcare benefits, and promised he would not tax them; but the bill he now backs will do just that.

    * Obama had promised that he would not sign a healthcare bill that would add one dime to the federal deficit; but the bill he now backs adds trillions in new federal spending, offset only by new sources of revenue that are both uncertain and more properly seen as offsetting the already existing deficit.

    * Obama coerced congress into passing his stimulus bill by promising that if it were passed unemployment could go no higher then 8%; but unemployment is now at 10%, and he could not possibly have had good reason to exclude that possibility.

    * Obama promised that his cap and trade legislation will create jobs; but its massive tax increases will certainly hobble the economy and destroy jobs, while green jobs in significant numbers can at best be hoped for, but never promised.

    * Obama has repeatedly assured the American people that if they like their current health plan they can keep it; but the House bill which he supported created huge incentives for employers to drop their coverage and shift their members to a public option.

    * Obama has just as often assured the public that under his health plan everyone will be able to keep their current doctor; but many are certain to lose their doctors when ObamaCare’s large cuts in Medicare funding induce more doctors to withdraw from Medicare coverage, as they also would were employers to transfer patients to a public option to save money.

    * Obama assured a joint session of Congress that his health plan would not fund illegal aliens; but his allies had been busy voting down amendments to that effect.  (This was the point of Joe Wilson’s outburst.)

    * Obama claimed that Caterpillar’s CEO had told him that Caterpillar would begin hiring again as a result of the stimulus bill; but that individual immediately announced that he had said no such thing, and that Caterpillar would in fact be laying off more workers.

    * Candidate Obama promised that Guantanamo would be closed by January 1, 2010; but it is still open.

    * Candidate Obama promised that his administration (unlike his predecessor’s) would be so transparent that TV cameras (C-Span) would be there for key deliberations; but an unprecedented level of secrecy prevails as the final stages of Obamacare are negotiated behind closed doors and kept so secret that even the Senate majority whip admitted that he had no idea what was going on.  Requests for Obama to honor the promise of C-Span cameras are being ignored.

    * To gain traction for his attempt to return a would-be socialist dictator in Honduras to power, Obama claimed that he had been overthrown in an illegal coup;  but the congressional research service pointed out correctly that ex-President Zelaya had been removed for constitutionally sufficient cause by legal and constitutional means.

    * Obama claims that he wants a public option only to increase choice and competition; but the House bill would clearly reduce choice both by squeezing unsubsidized private health plans out of the market, and by setting rigid conditions on acceptable plans that would narrow available options.

    * Candidate Obama claimed that violent radical Bill Ayers was just another guy in his neighborhood; but the record shows that the two had worked closely together.

    * Obama assured us that his stimulus bill would create or save a million jobs; but he was claiming as fact what could never have been more than a wild (and highly improbable) guess, and his more recent attempts to justify that guess have been fraudulent.

    * Obama assured us that his health plan would never ration care, or “pull the plug” on grandma; but the legislation he backs sets up panels to make crucial decisions on when to withhold care, and it makes such deep cuts in Medicare that rationing is inevitable.

    * Obama now assures us that health insurance premiums will not go up if ObamaCare becomes law, insisting indignantly that people who say this have not read the bill; but the legislation forces insurers to cover preexisting conditions, which will compel them to raise premiums substantially.

    This is an extraordinary record of serial mendacity. One or two instances might charitably be regarded as rash promises later regretted, or as the wishful thinking of someone who had not thought through the implications of what he was saying. But when it happens again and again—and my 30 instances are by no means exhaustive—only one judgment seems possible:  this is the record of a habitual, shameless liar, a man who will say anything to get what he wants. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me, goes the old saying. But scores of times? How shameful is that for our society when this disgraceful record is never the subject of a reproachful editorial in the New York Times, the Washington Post, or CBS news? Richard Nixon was removed from office, and Bill Clinton impeached for a single lie. Who could look at Obama’s record without concluding that his lying is in a completely different league to theirs?

    President Obama evidently believes that he can solve any problem with a speech.  But he really does not care whether what he says is true or not, nor does he feel any responsibility to honor the assurances and promises he makes.  As a result, this nation is now in a position where it cannot believe a word that he says, and that amounts to an unprecedented crisis of confidence in the Presidency. Democratic government will atrophy if we allow lying on this scale to count as the business as usual of politics. When will the press and the Congress hold him accountable?

    • Share/Bookmark
  • A A A
  • This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

    116 Responses for “The Lies of Obama”

    1. Constitute yoself says:

      most of you people are so brainwashed into this stupid left right game that you don’t realize that both parties are screwing us!

      Stop fighting each other. It is just what they want. How about a we the people party for once? I know we can agree on a lot of things if we are informed beyond Republican or Democrat bashing.

      Besides how the heck are you gonna convince anyone by contantly calling them names and assuming that they fit into your predefined box??

    2. [...] Obama’s ability for deception is quite stunning after reading an article simply titled The Lies of Obama. Readers should keep in mind that this list was compiled in just the first year of Obama’s [...]

    3. [...] to correct his virtual avalanche of lies, which John Ellis has catalogued in scandalous and chilling detail, saying that “the accumulated weight of Obama’s deceit is [...]

    4. JohnK144 says:

      "When will the press and Congress hold him accountable?"

      Perhaps after we replace the Congress and the press.

    5. JeffT says:

      I'm shocked, simply shocked, he didn't/won't/can't tell the truth.

    6. Cabby - AZ says:

      Having observed Obama for a year, there is no question that he doesn’t
      just lie, he is a consummate, habitual LIAR. The very fabric of his character
      is one big lie. No doubt, he has been doing this for a long time, and by now
      he really doesn’t know the truth when he sees it. Along with the deceit goes
      SELF-DECEPTION, and that is why he doesn’t “get it”. Couple that with
      being self-absorbed and arrogant and you have quite a hopeless
      combination. This is also a very DANGEROUS combination, especially
      when dealing in foreign affairs.

    7. Dunstan Hartley says:

      The American voter is merely getting the President that he(or she) deserves!

    8. bardefa says:

      As Mark Steyn aptly explains it for all:
      "So what went wrong? According to Barack Obama, the problem is that he overestimated you dumb rubes' ability to appreciate what he's been doing for you. "That I do think is a mistake of mine," the president told ABC's George Stephanopoulos. "I think the assumption was if I just focus on policy, if I just focus on this provision or that law or if we're making a good rational decision here, then people will get it."

      But you schlubs aren't that smart. You didn't get it. And Barack Obama is determined to see that you do. So the president has decided that he needs to start "speaking directly to the American people." (……………)

      But what will the president be saying in all these extra interviews? In that interview about how he hadn't given enough interviews, he also explained to George Stephanopoulos what that wacky Massachusetts election was all about:
      "The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office," said Obama. "People are angry, and they're frustrated, not just because of what's happened in the last year or two years but what's happened over the last eight years."
      Got it. People are so angry and frustrated at George W. Bush that they're voting for Republicans. In Massachusetts. Boy, I can't wait for that 159th interview.
      Presumably, the president isn't stupid enough actually to believe what he said. But it's dispiriting to discover he's stupid enough to think we're stupid enough to believe it.
      So who's panting for that 412th speech? Not the American Left. As Paul Krugman, The New York Times' "Conscience of a Liberal," put it: "He Wasn't The One We've Been Waiting For."
      Not the once-delirious Europeans, either. As the headline in Der Spiegel put it: "The World Bids Farewell To Obama."

    9. R. R. Everson, Ph.D. says:

      Wish I had gotten to this site sooner. But, as I've communicated many times before (which nobody ever picked up on to promulgate), which codifies what this article enumerates; Obama has earned himself an appellation akin (but hardly similar) to that of former Presidents…As Lincoln became known as "The Great Emancipator," and Reagan as "The Great Communicator;" (although Obama and "the media" imagine him to be the superior successor to Reagan's well-earned title), he actually has well-earned himself the title which he so well deserves…"THE GREAT DECEIVER!!"

      This article enumerates his contributions to the title, but, granting him every grace to potentially benefit his position as President of the United States (which so many seem to favor), isn't it well past time to drop this appellation upon his shoulders for all to see incessantly, as a warning for our very future?

    10. joseM says:

      Yo, "global warming" LIE idiots:

      "The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

      Dr Murari Lal also said he was well aware the statement, in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), did not rest on peer-reviewed scientific research.

      In an interview with The Mail on Sunday, Dr Lal, the co-ordinating lead author of the report’s chapter on Asia, said: ‘It related to several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action."

    11. George says:

      Another Huge Lie: a few weeks before the election, he told his supporters to go to their neighbors, to "get in their face, and, if they tell you I'm going to take their guns, tell them that's not true, I support the Second Amendment".
      Obama's record is completely Anti-gun, as is Eric Holder…they have already started to work against guns behind the scenes and are planning more attacks on our rights.

    12. George says:

      Check out the many videos on youtube.com showing Democrats totally supporting Bush and his position on Saddam and his WMD threats.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc

    13. George says:

      Bush did not lie. There were WMD, every Arab Muslim knows they were moved to Syria. General George Sada, the former chief of Saddam's Air Force, wrote in his book "Saddam's Secrets" that he personally talked to the pilots that flew the WMD into Syria. The real lie is that liberals shrieked in the media that the whole war was about "WMD" when that was only one out of a dozen reasons given in the congressional authorization. Bush was wrong thinking that bringing democracy into the area would "drain the swamp" for terrorist recruiting. He was wrong. Fundamentalist Islam is the problem and has nothing to do with our policies or actions. Those are excuses, lies that are part of the 1400 year old Jihad's deception campaign.

    14. George says:

      Saddam didn't have WMD? Did you hear about the 550 Metric tons of uranium yellowcake that was moved out of Iraq in July of 2008?
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334
      It's the Democrats, liberals and marxists who used the media as a Weapon of Mass Destruction, to wage psychological warfare against the American people, lying to them about the reality of Islamofascism and turning them against their own government. The liberals couldn't have done Bin Laden's job better for him.

    15. DeMarco says:

      I, and many others, believe Obama is a mole, planted long ago to undermine and destroy this country. The day Nikita Khruschev (sp) pounded his shoe on the table at the United Nations, he screamed that he would "take us over without spilling a drop of blood!" Look at Obama's circle of friends who are communists. This man is a danger to our republic and needs to be removed from office.

    16. [...] Ellis has posted a long list of his lies at Front [...]

    17. hayhauler says:

      Obama does not lie because he believes that he wants to lie. He lies because he is (please use traditional meaning of 'is') a liar – a self-deceived liar. It generally appears that he believes the lies he is telling. The weight of history and the judgment of God may be the only antidote to his self-deception. Or he could decide to repent – NO LIE!

    18. JDF says:

      Mr Smart is a typical liberal. Point at someone else with unsubstantiated claims to get the heat off his guy. Obama is despicable.

    19. Perry Utanis says:

      Barack Obama won the presidency supported by american fans, the nobel peace price supported by foreign fans, but America lost all credibility?

    20. This site was well done. I have been searching for just this kind of site.I am indebted for this information.

    Comments are closed

    SUBSCRIBE TO FPM: Email RSS Comments Twitter
    / Copyright© 2009 FrontPageMagazine.com