And by the way, I used to be an avid FPM reader, until I learned how much of the story they omit from the discussion. Run in to an informed person and if you're armed with the knowledge provided by the people here you'll lose the argument every time. Pick up a book by Noam Chomsky and learn about what your not hearing here.

For FPM this criticism of U.S. sponsored terror suddenly is transformed into "Romance" and "Support" for brutal regimes that happen to be enemies of the U.S. Why doesn't his criticism also make him a supporter of U.S. client terrorist regimes in El Salvador or Guatamala or Colombia? How about Uzbhekistan where they like to boil people alive, rape them with broken bottles, and torture children in front of their parents in order to supply information to the CIA? He's never tied to those regimes because those regimes are U.S. clients. They are our buddies, so their terrorism and torture isn't something that arouses attention. It's only when enemies of the state engaged in evil behavior that FPM will notice.

He is demonized here for asking us to look in the mirror. He's demonized for asking us to apply the same standards to ourselves that we demand of others. For this he's supposedly in love with the Soviet Union and Islamic fundamentalism. It's so preposterous it's amazing to me that anyone can believe it.

One of the greatest shibboleths of the Western Leftisit liberal is that they are the compassionate, thoughtful political movement, when the fact is THEY are filled with all the stereotypical hatreds of which they accuse the Right:

They are homophobes, they are racists, they are classists, they are bigots. Walter Duranty, perhaps the proto-Modern LIberal, set the mold. For years, his racist, bigoted screeds in the New York Times insisted that the people of the Soviet Union were "Asians", and as such, were incapable of individual thought, and were, in fact, better treated with authoritarian, iron-fisted controll. Duranty's hateful invective perfectly fit with the eugenic posture of most of the achedemic left at the time that held people were not soveriegn individuals, but part of an oozing, maleable ectoplasm to be formed and shaped by elites of the state. This is why HItler and Tojo can never be viewed in a cultural vacuum. They were supported in world-wide achedemic/scientific thought to be cutting-edge statesmen that us Americans, cast-offs from an antique, Christian, Anglican world could not understand.

Rather like the Global Warming alarmist of today.

From Michael Moore to Noam Chomsky, the left is besotted with these creeps that loathe and despise humanity. To them, the fewer people, the better. In fact, this could be the underlying assumption of Leftism: They Hate People. Thus they embrace Maraget Sanger and her genocide against African American babies, or Lillian Hellman and her feeling that we would all be Stalinists if we could look inside American prisons. They appreciate mass murderers because they cull the herd, as they see it, that's spoiling their view of Utopia.