Comments on: The Heretics: Lord Christopher Monckton

By: Geraldo Kufel

Geraldo Kufel — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:43:26 +0000

I’m not really certain if I am posting this in the right location, but I’m getting ready to transfer to the United States and am wanting to secure jobs in the i . t field. I currently have a job lead with a business (LTJ Management, LLC, 900 Congress Ave, Suite L-150, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 895-9500) and wanted some ideas on the best way to study them to see if they might be a great business to work for. I’ve checked on their website, but thought somebody here may have a few other thoughts on where to look. Thank very much.

By: Palm Oil Land For Sale

Palm Oil Land For Sale — Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:47:19 +0000

I believe that is among the so much important information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some common issues, The site style is perfect, the articles is in point of fact nice : D. Excellent job, cheers

By: Ed Darrell

Ed Darrell — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:11:23 +0000

Now in July 1022, feel the same, Big Ed?

By: Abraham

Abraham — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:45:08 +0000

Monckton is the politician with the agenda – and no one else.

NOT A SINGLE scientific referenve Monckten uses to argue his case agree with him! Every writer of those very same references claim Monckten is misusing and twisting the data and fact to suit his own argument and not to present it in the true manner it has been written.

In other words, Monckten is the real liar and climate deceptive.

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:38:55 +0000

You are off. Monckton – who is not a scientist by any means but a politician – has actually been shown to be completely wrong in the scientific references he quotes to back his own arguments. Not only has his conclusions been wrong about proper scientific studies, but he has also used references that don't originate from proper sources, and some that even are pre-written drafts and not even completed studies.
And who is it that argues against Moncktons scientific claims? The very scientists who wrote the articles Monckton uses on a daily basis.

They claim Monckton is twisting their facts around and deny a very dangerous problem that face all of us, and denials like the ones he put forth is simply slowing down any decisions to make changes to save us from growing calamities of the future. According to the scientists there are thousands of studies to prove the reality of climate changes and them being unnatural and man-made, but not a single scientific study proving this to be wrong.

Monckton is simply a typical politician: trying to use persuation instead of facts for his own agenda.

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:31:45 +0000

Your article is actually completely off. If people want facts and truth, the political agenda of Monckton only provides a twisted version of scientific facts.

A TV program was made about Moncktons 'scientific' support to his claims – and the real truth was that even the scientists that Monckton refer to in his arguments on climate change DISAGREE with him!
The very people he constantly point to as evidence to false climate change claims, say Monckton is twisting their data to fit his own agenda. In other words Monckton did not have EVEN ONE supporter amongst his own scientific references! On the contrary they said he is avoiding to bring the fact to people in which all scientific research shows one thing: CLIMATE PROBLEMS ARE REAL, UNNATURAL AND ARE CAUSED BY MAN.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00y5j3v/Sto…

By: Snapple

Snapple — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:35:30 +0000

I used to read your site, but Lord Monckton is just like Ward Churchill. He mischaracterizes what real scientists say.

He also goes on Russia Today and says that Russia is 20 times more democratic than Britain. Global warming is real.

By: TomPaine2

TomPaine2 — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:27:48 +0000

Hear hear! (Altho' this is addressed as reply to Bob's excellent comments, it's also intended as a general observation.)
There's not much I can add to the dissident voices except to say that I fully concur with Chris Monckton's view that the "anthropogenic climate change" priesthood of superstitionist, fraudulent anti-science, tautology, is set on one global agenda alone, and that is the final abrogation of the institution of the perfectly independent sovereign nation state republic; its final erasure from history, and the Malthusian elimination of at least five billion men, women and children from the planet.

But Monckton – although famously critical of the monarch of Britain, Elizabeth 2, when she let slip, at the Trinidad summit of "commonwealth" leaders earlier this year, that the British empire must "play its part" and must be restored for the "good" of the world and the "environment" (I paraphrase), and although he comes close to identifying the London-centered British-imperial financier oligarchy (the infamous Venetian Party of old), misses, by not being more specific in this regard.

By: SCUMBUCKET

SCUMBUCKET — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:49:31 +0000

Is this the same Lord Monckton who calls Americans Nazis and Hitler Youth, and who accepts funding from Koch Industries, a leading petroleum company that has dumped 48 million into efforts to debunk global warming? Thought so…

By: Stephen Brady

Stephen Brady — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:53:29 +0000

Right on, Bubba! Now, you're talking!

By: The Heretics: Anthony Watts | FrontPage Magazine

The Heretics: Anthony Watts | FrontPage Magazine — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:14:46 +0000

[...] Previous profiles in the series include Steve Milloy, Dr. Craig Idso, Dr. Roy Spencer, and Lord Christopher Monckton. – The [...]

By: The Heretics: Lord Christopher Monckton « Ramparts 360

The Heretics: Lord Christopher Monckton « Ramparts 360 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:44:55 +0000

[...] at FrontPageMag.com Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Lord Monckton v. GreenpeaceMichael Coren with Lord [...]

By: BernardL

BernardL — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:41:07 +0000

There's nothing sad about Beck and Hannity outing each new Man-made Global Warming fraud as it becomes public except if you're an acolyte of the new GW religion or a Carbon Credit trader. Here's just one of the many Mafia like frauds. If you want more, Bubba, do your own research only I would suggest opening your eyes this time.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/e…

By: Gerald Smith

Gerald Smith — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:09:20 +0000

The funding the skeptics have received from all sources is measured in the llions while the fundinding received by the alarmist scientists is measured in the billions . To maintain that level of funding the scientists have to flavor their proposals to reflect that they are trying to prove Anthropogenic Global Warming.

By: Gerald Smith

Gerald Smith — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:55:32 +0000

Where is the proof that man is causing Global Warming? If it is the models where is the proof that they are accurate? Perhaps the proof ypu have is that you, the IPCC nor anyone else knows but since you don't " it must be anthropogenic.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:57:19 +0000

You either misunderstand what you read, or are deliberately misreading it. It's not about where the data was. It's about the actual data. It was dumped.

Um…it was paper and magnetic tape (probably 1"). The article you posted said it was destroyed because of a physical storage issue. It didn't say that they ran their simulations, gathered the answers they wanted then dumped all the data from their computers leaving only the conclusions. That is silly.

"All we have from them is their word as to what it was, and we have their computations based on the now unerifiable data."

um…no…but what they don't have is the original copies of some pre 80's data on paper and magnetic tape. Hey, I understand…if I was getting audited and only had summary statements of my receipts prepared at the time, but the receipts got destroyed….who knows…maybe I faked it.

Let's say there was a warehouse of magnetic tape and paper notes in some back building at the University. Would you would be down there going through all that shit? Of course not. Weather station data isn't very exciting…and if you love it that much you can find pretty much every scrap of it on the Global Historical Climatology Network or through NASA.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:30:40 +0000

"bubba you know exactly what code he is talking about…The simulation code that gives the "global scientists" the answer they want."

Oh the "global scientists code"….of course…

"If you have ever written or seen fluid dynamics code, which is similar to what the "global warming scientists" are using, you know that there are so many variables that affect the outcome."

When have you written any code in any language for anything? I just asked the guy which code he wanted to get that he was being refused access to. Let anonymous answer…since he works in simulations….lol.

"So the sceptics would like to see how they setup the software, what the variables are…and so on. Thats all, whats the big secret."

Again…who is "they"? University of East Anglia? NASA? Some other scientist? What kind of request has been made for said material? By whom? If he hasn't asked for it personally, who is trying to get it and told him it was inaccessible?

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:43:36 +0000

I've made several requests to Horowitz to debate me about his zionist tendencies and constant lying. He has refused…and I am assuming that this is because he is a liar and scared and not because I am a nobody who's invite was itself a personal insult.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:40:50 +0000

The sad thing is Beck and Hannity get paid large sums of money to spout this nonsense. You don't get paid anything and you will come here and defend your "reality" to the bitter end.

What has actually been done to prevent Global warming that you think is Mafia-like? You seem to forget whether you are slandering past events or events you fear that haven't happened yet.

By: bubba4

bubba4 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:34:59 +0000

I don't have "talking points". I read the articles and I post.

Lord Christopher Monckton also appears on Glen Beck's show and says that the "pact" is just a conspiracy to form a one-world government.

I'm not sure what "pact" he is talking about, but anyone that goes on Beck to back up his insanity is asking to not be taken seriously. I think I will change my name to Lord Bubba so I have a little extra gravitas.

I guess a good question for you is how do you know who to believe? You believe this guy right out of the box and accept that Al Gore is a liar that can't be trusted….so aren't you just fitting evidence to support how you want to feel about it….