Comments on: The New Attack on Palin? Associate Her with John Edwards http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:06:55 +0000 hourly 1 By: LucyQ http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19641 LucyQ Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:27:55 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19641 The queens, Peter Collier & Andrew Sullivan should both try real journalism in their obviously shallow lives. The queens, Peter Collier & Andrew Sullivan should both try real journalism in their obviously shallow lives.

]]> By: ben http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19587 ben Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:00:11 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19587 You idiots on the left like to attack her speech (accent, folksy language) her college choices (not Ivy League) and her "dysfunctional family" (Average American Family), you even attack her appearance (pretty but dumb stereotype) but you ignore her actions. Actions are the clearest indicator of character and ability. It's the lefts disdain for character, ability and evidence, and their elevation of intentions (the road to hell...) and appearance (superficial) that show what kind of shallow, superficial and ignorant people reside on their side. You idiots on the left like to attack her speech (accent, folksy language) her college choices (not Ivy League) and her "dysfunctional family" (Average American Family), you even attack her appearance (pretty but dumb stereotype) but you ignore her actions. Actions are the clearest indicator of character and ability. It's the lefts disdain for character, ability and evidence, and their elevation of intentions (the road to hell…) and appearance (superficial) that show what kind of shallow, superficial and ignorant people reside on their side.

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19580 trickyblain Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:50:34 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19580 What did she say that was intellegent? What did she say that was intellegent?

]]> By: 080 http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19547 080 Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:25:57 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19547 Well, you have to admit that an awful amount of people like her. So do I. Well, you have to admit that an awful amount of people like her. So do I.

]]> By: martha http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19620 martha Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:21:01 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19620 Explain how you made that connection please Thank you Explain how you made that connection please
Thank you

]]> By: Watchful Gramma http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19619 Watchful Gramma Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:15:09 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19619 Loved her comment today about so-called "global warming" calling it "snake-oil science"! She tells it like it is and puts it into the vernacular so that anyone can understand it. Go, Sarah! Loved her comment today about so-called "global warming" calling it "snake-oil science"! She tells it like it is and puts it into the vernacular so that anyone can understand it. Go, Sarah!

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19604 trickyblain Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:34:57 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19604 I didn't attack any of those. That you resort to calling anyone who doubts her qualifications "idiots" shows your lack of standing in this argument. Palin's approval ratings were so high because she had just handed out over $2,000 to every Alaskan. What she didn't tell you is that about $1,200 of that was in the form of a tax rebate (from a tax she opposed). And of course, it's long standing practice to ave these socailist handouts in Alsaka, it's not like Palin invented these handouts. How are her numbers looking after she bailed out on her job? You on the right scream, cry and holler about people "attacking" poor Sarah. Too dense to realise that the only thing she is good at is attacking. Pull up her quotes on Google (and don't be retarded and try to claim Google has politically biased searches -- algorithms are not capable of a political agenda). From those quotes, show me three that give specific ideas on how she could improve the economy and her spelled out reasoning behind them....good luck! I didn't attack any of those. That you resort to calling anyone who doubts her qualifications "idiots" shows your lack of standing in this argument.

Palin's approval ratings were so high because she had just handed out over $2,000 to every Alaskan. What she didn't tell you is that about $1,200 of that was in the form of a tax rebate (from a tax she opposed). And of course, it's long standing practice to ave these socailist handouts in Alsaka, it's not like Palin invented these handouts. How are her numbers looking after she bailed out on her job?

You on the right scream, cry and holler about people "attacking" poor Sarah. Too dense to realise that the only thing she is good at is attacking. Pull up her quotes on Google (and don't be retarded and try to claim Google has politically biased searches — algorithms are not capable of a political agenda). From those quotes, show me three that give specific ideas on how she could improve the economy and her spelled out reasoning behind them….good luck!

]]> By: ben http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19586 ben Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:00:03 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19586 Palin revealed herself as a person of integrity and principals wherever she has served the public. Before she was announced as McCain's running mate she had an 89% approval including 75% among Democrats - The Dems liked her until the DNC told them not to. When Gov palin was able to secure more money from the use of AKs resources, she could've went the Dem route, grew gov't and enacted more programs to prop herself up as a "savior of the people" but she didn't. Her principals stated that the resources of a state belong to the people of the state. She took only what the gov't needed to run and returned all the rest to the people through payments and lower taxes. Palin revealed herself as a person of integrity and principals wherever she has served the public. Before she was announced as McCain's running mate she had an 89% approval including 75% among Democrats – The Dems liked her until the DNC told them not to. When Gov palin was able to secure more money from the use of AKs resources, she could've went the Dem route, grew gov't and enacted more programs to prop herself up as a "savior of the people" but she didn't. Her principals stated that the resources of a state belong to the people of the state. She took only what the gov't needed to run and returned all the rest to the people through payments and lower taxes.

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19585 trickyblain Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:59:43 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19585 Speaking of old military farts and results, my uncle - a lifelong Republican, VN vet and Marine - was begrudgeingly leaning towards McCain in 2008. Then McCain brought Palin on. Then Palin spoke publicly. Then my uncle voted for Obama in disgust. He did not vote Obama because of McCain's advisors -- he did so because he thought Palin a joke. He does not regret his decision. Speaking of old military farts and results, my uncle – a lifelong Republican, VN vet and Marine – was begrudgeingly leaning towards McCain in 2008. Then McCain brought Palin on. Then Palin spoke publicly. Then my uncle voted for Obama in disgust.

He did not vote Obama because of McCain's advisors — he did so because he thought Palin a joke. He does not regret his decision.

]]> By: Joy http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19544 Joy Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:21:02 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19544 Well, for one thing, HuffPo and its editor Zsa Zsa does NOT represent "the majority of this country!" - and, thank God for small favors!! As for the sage advice of McCain's "advisors," check out the results of the 2008 Election - and just about every "crossing the aisle" legislation that old military fart has been involved in, and you get an idea of just how useful/effective the "advice" and counsel of those hack aides were during the last election cycle. With a few notable exceptions - the ones that are now on Palin's staff! LOL!! - they are "has beens who never were," as my father used to be fond of saying... Well, for one thing, HuffPo and its editor Zsa Zsa does NOT represent “the majority of this country!” – and, thank God for small favors!! As for the sage advice of McCain’s “advisors,” check out the results of the 2008 Election – and just about every “crossing the aisle” legislation that old military fart has been involved in, and you get an idea of just how useful/effective the “advice” and counsel of those hack aides were during the last election cycle. With a few notable exceptions – the ones that are now on Palin’s staff! LOL!! – they are “has beens who never were,” as my father used to be fond of saying…

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19535 trickyblain Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:47:08 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19535 Who the hell is Erica Jong? Tell us why her statements are a valuable citation in your condemnation of anyone who voted against McCain/Palin. "Oh, it's endless. Also, as the Pew Research poll has shown, Republicans are happier people and polling has shown this since they first started questioning in the 70s. Probably because so many Democrats are emotionally unstable. " What's it they say: ignorance is (hint: rhymes with "miss"). Telling yourself you are a happier/better person because of a checkbox on your voter registration card is hardly a sign of emotional stablity. I know plenty of rich Dems who are quite happy. My housekeeper is a Republican and a black cloud of doom follows her wherever she goes. My guess is that this is because of choices they've made in life, not because of who they voted for. Who the hell is Erica Jong? Tell us why her statements are a valuable citation in your condemnation of anyone who voted against McCain/Palin.

"Oh, it's endless. Also, as the Pew Research poll has shown, Republicans are happier people and polling has shown this since they first started questioning in the 70s. Probably because so many Democrats are emotionally unstable. "

What's it they say: ignorance is (hint: rhymes with "miss"). Telling yourself you are a happier/better person because of a checkbox on your voter registration card is hardly a sign of emotional stablity. I know plenty of rich Dems who are quite happy. My housekeeper is a Republican and a black cloud of doom follows her wherever she goes. My guess is that this is because of choices they've made in life, not because of who they voted for.

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19529 trickyblain Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:29:32 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19529 To this day, I don't understand how she had the nerve to criticize Obama's use of a teleprompter. Actually, I do understand - she can fool her supporters who ignore the fact that she uses them all the time (her RNC speech - all through the 2008 campaign). Just as she can fool them into thinking she is really upset at Emmanuel for calling folks "retards," but dismisses Limbaugh's repeated use of the term as "satire." A thinking person can easily see trough this nonsense. Her fans cannot and will not. They take any criticism of her as “fear,” “bias,” and being “unhinged.” They look at her performance in an interview with the lightweight Katie Couric and blame Couric for being unfair. They look at Obama’s performance with the same Couric and tell themselves that she was asking him softball questions. There are no wrong answers, but it really doesn’t matter – to the majority, Palin reveals herself every time she opens her mouth. They take Tina Fey more seriously than they do Palin. All this said, she does not deserve to be associated with John Edwards. To this day, I don't understand how she had the nerve to criticize Obama's use of a teleprompter. Actually, I do understand – she can fool her supporters who ignore the fact that she uses them all the time (her RNC speech – all through the 2008 campaign). Just as she can fool them into thinking she is really upset at Emmanuel for calling folks "retards," but dismisses Limbaugh's repeated use of the term as "satire." A thinking person can easily see trough this nonsense. Her fans cannot and will not. They take any criticism of her as “fear,” “bias,” and being “unhinged.” They look at her performance in an interview with the lightweight Katie Couric and blame Couric for being unfair. They look at Obama’s performance with the same Couric and tell themselves that she was asking him softball questions. There are no wrong answers, but it really doesn’t matter – to the majority, Palin reveals herself every time she opens her mouth. They take Tina Fey more seriously than they do Palin.

All this said, she does not deserve to be associated with John Edwards.

]]> By: trickyblain http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19528 trickyblain Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:28:47 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19528 Looking at his resume, he is qualified. Con law, Senator, etc, etc, etc. Palin is nothing more than an attack dog in a pretty package...she's good at it, but it's all she knows. Ask her about issues and what you get is the same simplistic rhetoric..."common sense, inspiration, values, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit." While the attacking aspect of her appeals enormously to politireligious fans that populate blogs, talk radio and mindless scream shows like Hannity and Beck, it doesn't fly with the majority -- or any rational, thinking being for that matter. Ask a typical Palin supporter what they admire about her and what you will get is generalities: "She has values. She is not part of the establishment. Bullshit. Bullshit. Bullshit." For all the talk about the "MSM," it is Palin that has benefited most from the low-brow media establishment that is obsessed with her. Looking at his resume, he is qualified. Con law, Senator, etc, etc, etc. Palin is nothing more than an attack dog in a pretty package…she's good at it, but it's all she knows. Ask her about issues and what you get is the same simplistic rhetoric…"common sense, inspiration, values, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit." While the attacking aspect of her appeals enormously to politireligious fans that populate blogs, talk radio and mindless scream shows like Hannity and Beck, it doesn't fly with the majority — or any rational, thinking being for that matter. Ask a typical Palin supporter what they admire about her and what you will get is generalities: "She has values. She is not part of the establishment. Bullshit. Bullshit. Bullshit." For all the talk about the "MSM," it is Palin that has benefited most from the low-brow media establishment that is obsessed with her.

]]> By: eyes wide open http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19494 eyes wide open Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:55:21 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19494 Evil ? Palin ? No , not at all . Mindless ? , Not an original thought in her head ? A parrot who needs to be taught what to say and When ? You bet . LOL....and it's much more than an estimation of the Left . McCains own aides told him . If you think it's just the Left , well that's your oown delusion . Maybe you think the Tea Party bunch speaks for the majority of this country ....if so , your are again suffering from delusion . Evil ? Palin ? No , not at all .

Mindless ? , Not an original thought in her head ? A parrot who needs to be taught what to say and When ?

You bet .

LOL….and it's much more than an estimation of the Left . McCains own aides told him .

If you think it's just the Left , well that's your oown delusion . Maybe you think the Tea Party bunch speaks for the majority of this country ….if so , your are again suffering from delusion .

]]> By: Tim http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19445 Tim Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:02:20 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19445 Really? Then why spend so much time attacking her if this is so "trivial and unimportant"? Really? Then why spend so much time attacking her if this is so “trivial and unimportant”?

]]> By: Tim http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19443 Tim Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:00:54 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19443 Wow. that sounded almost like it came straight from HuPo! Congrats on being unable to think for yourself! Seeing as how we're on a "we can't attack the message, so we'll attack the person and the people who support her", then answer these two questions - (1) If you're so offended by how the RNC spends it's money on campaigning, then how do you feel about Edwards $400 hair cuts, or Hillary's $1500 hair-dos, or Obama's $4,000+ suits that are only worn once? (2) Where is your criticism of how other politicians and political party spends their monies for campaigning - as in the examples in question 1? Wow. that sounded almost like it came straight from HuPo! Congrats on being unable to think for yourself!

Seeing as how we’re on a “we can’t attack the message, so we’ll attack the person and the people who support her”, then answer these two questions –

(1) If you’re so offended by how the RNC spends it’s money on campaigning, then how do you feel about Edwards $400 hair cuts, or Hillary’s $1500 hair-dos, or Obama’s $4,000+ suits that are only worn once?

(2) Where is your criticism of how other politicians and political party spends their monies for campaigning – as in the examples in question 1?

]]> By: Joy http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19440 Joy Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:47:35 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19440 I don't see much "laughter" from the libturds these days - mainly unhinged, maniacal ravings, rants & lies. Palin has become a lightning rod for both sides, but those who admire her are finally enjoying a break from the non-stop dull, dim and lying crowd that normally fill the political airspace. Most of us will continue to listen to and admire Palin whether she's POTUS or not; in fact, most of the candidates across the spectrum draw nothing but a big fat yawn - and also no little boreboding that they will practice politics as usual until the well has run completely dry (i.e., the US Treasury is busted). We will count on Conservatives - Republicans and even those sensible Democrats - to finally come to their senses and cut as much spending as possible. Obama, in case you hadn't noticed, is a total complete incompetent and lying fool - and 2012 can't come soon enough!! I don’t see much “laughter” from the libturds these days – mainly unhinged, maniacal ravings, rants & lies. Palin has become a lightning rod for both sides, but those who admire her are finally enjoying a break from the non-stop dull, dim and lying crowd that normally fill the political airspace. Most of us will continue to listen to and admire Palin whether she’s POTUS or not; in fact, most of the candidates across the spectrum draw nothing but a big fat yawn – and also no little boreboding that they will practice politics as usual until the well has run completely dry (i.e., the US Treasury is busted). We will count on Conservatives – Republicans and even those sensible Democrats – to finally come to their senses and cut as much spending as possible. Obama, in case you hadn’t noticed, is a total complete incompetent and lying fool – and 2012 can’t come soon enough!!

]]> By: Joy http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19426 Joy Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:57:15 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19426 morrisminder or whatever - you repeat the lies about Palin and it confirms your idiocy and hatred. The truth is NOT within your grasp - it would undo your mental bloc and warped mindset. I wonder just what is it about Palin that so unravels the libturds? And, yes, although not so identified, there were/are, indeed, "decision panels" on healthcare rationing in that putrid piece of legislation - i.e., "death panels," when life & death is being decided by those other than the patient, his family and/or his doctor(s). morrisminder or whatever – you repeat the lies about Palin and it confirms your idiocy and hatred. The truth is NOT within your grasp – it would undo your mental bloc and warped mindset. I wonder just what is it about Palin that so unravels the libturds? And, yes, although not so identified, there were/are, indeed, “decision panels” on healthcare rationing in that putrid piece of legislation – i.e., “death panels,” when life & death is being decided by those other than the patient, his family and/or his doctor(s).

]]> By: davarino http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19300 davarino Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:27:33 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19300 Wow, for someone who is supposed to be the most evil/dumbest woman on the earth and no chance of winning any political office, she sure does draw a lot of attention from the left. I know, the left wants to make sure we choose the best candidate for our party. They dont want the presidency to be a slam dunk for them in 2012. They want to make it a challenge hehehe. I can understand that. The people are waking up to the snake charmers lies. Wow, for someone who is supposed to be the most evil/dumbest woman on the earth and no chance of winning any political office, she sure does draw a lot of attention from the left. I know, the left wants to make sure we choose the best candidate for our party. They dont want the presidency to be a slam dunk for them in 2012. They want to make it a challenge hehehe. I can understand that.

The people are waking up to the snake charmers lies.

]]> By: Chidog http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/08/the-new-attack-on-palin-associate-her-with-john-edwards-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19321 Chidog Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:54:33 +0000 http://frontpagemag.com/?p=48952#comment-19321 Palin took $150K in clothes illegally? Wow. To so blatantly show how ignorant you are is really embarrassing for you. Palin took $150K in clothes illegally?

Wow. To so blatantly show how ignorant you are is really embarrassing for you.

]]>