<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Era of Responsibility?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton Luca</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-1618805</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton Luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-1618805</guid>
		<description>Food inflation is real, and it is here. Just yesterday I compared my receipt from a grocery run to prices I have from the same exact store from September 15, 2009. Bacon? Up 52% to $13.69 from $8.99 for 4 lbs. Butter? Up 73% to $9.99 from $5.79 for 4 lbs. Pure vanilla extract up 14% to $6.79 from $5.95. Chopped dried onions up a mere 2% but minced garlic (wet) was up 32%. The ONLY thing that I have hard data from in both visits and went down is canned chicken  that declined by 9% though there was a demonstration on that product so I am curious if the price will be higher next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food inflation is real, and it is here. Just yesterday I compared my receipt from a grocery run to prices I have from the same exact store from September 15, 2009. Bacon? Up 52% to $13.69 from $8.99 for 4 lbs. Butter? Up 73% to $9.99 from $5.79 for 4 lbs. Pure vanilla extract up 14% to $6.79 from $5.95. Chopped dried onions up a mere 2% but minced garlic (wet) was up 32%. The ONLY thing that I have hard data from in both visits and went down is canned chicken  that declined by 9% though there was a demonstration on that product so I am curious if the price will be higher next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keithrage</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19697</link>
		<dc:creator>Keithrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19697</guid>
		<description>Ten years of union and leftist government have left Detroit as a third world city, that is what the U.S will be under this puppet/clown if he is to continue his new world agenda. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten years of union and leftist government have left Detroit as a third world city, that is what the U.S will be under this puppet/clown if he is to continue his new world agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba4</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19664</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19664</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it Linda...just like they taught you. If you even get a whiff of race just start pointing and screaming racist!  Give me a break.  You&#039;re being offended is an act. Do me a favor...stop posting multiple times and reposting the same shit day after day. That&#039;s offensive for real.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s it Linda&#8230;just like they taught you. If you even get a whiff of race just start pointing and screaming racist!  Give me a break.  You&#039;re being offended is an act. Do me a favor&#8230;stop posting multiple times and reposting the same shit day after day. That&#039;s offensive for real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba4</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19661</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19661</guid>
		<description>&quot;Arthur Laffer simply pointed out that neither 100% taxation, or 0% taxation yields long-term revenue...&quot; 
 
Maybe I should have put quotes around it. He and his curve were often cited as evidence for &quot;trickle-down&quot; economics and he himself went around promoting Reagan&#039;s policies on television and other media. These boxes are very small...I use shorthand whenever possible. 
 
It&#039;s true that the eighties saw growth and recovery from the 70&#039;s but Reagan still added a tremendous amount of debt. The entire world was in recession during the 70&#039;s and then there was the oil crisis that started in 73. Your magic turn around credited to Reagan gives him all the credit and then any blame for debt is shifted elsewhere. If you can&#039;t look at Saint Rony without the halo, then what is there to talk about. 
 
We couldn&#039;t &quot;help the Shah&quot; because Jimmy Carter destroyed the military? Christ...you guys have your own bizarro world history that stretches back as far as you care to think. Who put the Shah in power? Who propped up his government? 
 
And I suppose that when Reagan was elected, the new Iranian leadership was so scared that they released the hostages so as not to enrage the God in charge of the United States. You&#039;re clearly older...but definitely not wiser for the effort. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Arthur Laffer simply pointed out that neither 100% taxation, or 0% taxation yields long-term revenue&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>Maybe I should have put quotes around it. He and his curve were often cited as evidence for &quot;trickle-down&quot; economics and he himself went around promoting Reagan&#039;s policies on television and other media. These boxes are very small&#8230;I use shorthand whenever possible. </p>
<p>It&#039;s true that the eighties saw growth and recovery from the 70&#039;s but Reagan still added a tremendous amount of debt. The entire world was in recession during the 70&#039;s and then there was the oil crisis that started in 73. Your magic turn around credited to Reagan gives him all the credit and then any blame for debt is shifted elsewhere. If you can&#039;t look at Saint Rony without the halo, then what is there to talk about. </p>
<p>We couldn&#039;t &quot;help the Shah&quot; because Jimmy Carter destroyed the military? Christ&#8230;you guys have your own bizarro world history that stretches back as far as you care to think. Who put the Shah in power? Who propped up his government? </p>
<p>And I suppose that when Reagan was elected, the new Iranian leadership was so scared that they released the hostages so as not to enrage the God in charge of the United States. You&#039;re clearly older&#8230;but definitely not wiser for the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johncarens</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19642</link>
		<dc:creator>johncarens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19642</guid>
		<description>Arthur Laffer simply pointed out that neither 100% taxation, or 0% taxation yields long-term revenue, and that somewhere along that irregular curve is the point at which X% of taxation yields the greatest amount revenue to the treasury. This is not even debatable. Even John Maynard Keynes recognized this.Certainly that nexus wasn&#039;t at the higher levels of taxation, because year-to-year receipts to the government were down despite higher and higher rates and fees throughout the 1970&#039;s. Taxes had to be raised, people like Jimmy Carter felt, year over year just to keep up with inflation, not to mention systemic spending problems. 
 
There was nothing &quot;voodoo&quot; about the Kemp-Roth law: Despite bringing top marginal rates down from a high o 92% to as low as 32%, revenues in constant dollars to the treasury quadrupled though the 1980&#039;s. Also, 20 Million jobs were created, interest rates came down from 21% to under 8%, and unemployment, which had reached a high of 12% came down to under 7% by 1986. Best of all, the supply of dollars chasing out dollars came to a halt, when inflation, that was clipping along at 14% annually at its worst, came to a screeching halt to under 3% by 1987... And they call this current hiccup the &quot;Worst Recession since the Great Depression&quot;. Hah. This is a piker compared to 1979-1981. 
 
The deficit problem under Reagan (which, throughout most of the 1980&#039;s remained below 18% of GNP) came from two places:  
 
1) The inability of congress to cut spending. By law (TEFRA 1982), they were required to make $3 in cuts to every $1 in new taxes. The new taxes came, but the cuts never did.  
 
2) Reagan had to rebuild the military after it was gutted under Jimmy Carter. Remember, we had entire fleets of jets, ships and armor that couldn&#039;t move for lack of spare parts, and vast swaths of personnel were on Food Stamps, and training without any proper equipment. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union was on the march in Latin America, the Near and Middle East, and Afghanistan, and we couldn&#039;t even help good friends like the Shah of Iran (a mistake for which we are still paying 30 years on).  
 
The Soviet Union is now dust, and we had nearly thirty years of prosperity, with constant growth in real earnings with fewer raw materials and greater productivity. Sounds like it worked pretty brilliantly to me.  
 
At least until Stretch Pelosi got a hold of things in 2006. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur Laffer simply pointed out that neither 100% taxation, or 0% taxation yields long-term revenue, and that somewhere along that irregular curve is the point at which X% of taxation yields the greatest amount revenue to the treasury. This is not even debatable. Even John Maynard Keynes recognized this.Certainly that nexus wasn&#039;t at the higher levels of taxation, because year-to-year receipts to the government were down despite higher and higher rates and fees throughout the 1970&#039;s. Taxes had to be raised, people like Jimmy Carter felt, year over year just to keep up with inflation, not to mention systemic spending problems. </p>
<p>There was nothing &quot;voodoo&quot; about the Kemp-Roth law: Despite bringing top marginal rates down from a high o 92% to as low as 32%, revenues in constant dollars to the treasury quadrupled though the 1980&#039;s. Also, 20 Million jobs were created, interest rates came down from 21% to under 8%, and unemployment, which had reached a high of 12% came down to under 7% by 1986. Best of all, the supply of dollars chasing out dollars came to a halt, when inflation, that was clipping along at 14% annually at its worst, came to a screeching halt to under 3% by 1987&#8230; And they call this current hiccup the &quot;Worst Recession since the Great Depression&quot;. Hah. This is a piker compared to 1979-1981. </p>
<p>The deficit problem under Reagan (which, throughout most of the 1980&#039;s remained below 18% of GNP) came from two places:  </p>
<p>1) The inability of congress to cut spending. By law (TEFRA 1982), they were required to make $3 in cuts to every $1 in new taxes. The new taxes came, but the cuts never did.  </p>
<p>2) Reagan had to rebuild the military after it was gutted under Jimmy Carter. Remember, we had entire fleets of jets, ships and armor that couldn&#039;t move for lack of spare parts, and vast swaths of personnel were on Food Stamps, and training without any proper equipment. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union was on the march in Latin America, the Near and Middle East, and Afghanistan, and we couldn&#039;t even help good friends like the Shah of Iran (a mistake for which we are still paying 30 years on).  </p>
<p>The Soviet Union is now dust, and we had nearly thirty years of prosperity, with constant growth in real earnings with fewer raw materials and greater productivity. Sounds like it worked pretty brilliantly to me.  </p>
<p>At least until Stretch Pelosi got a hold of things in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCSniper</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19579</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCSniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19579</guid>
		<description>darky? I have not heard that one in while.  A  3.3 trillion dollar budget?  Explain that one away!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>darky? I have not heard that one in while.  A  3.3 trillion dollar budget?  Explain that one away!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCSniper</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19577</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCSniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19577</guid>
		<description>You are to the point that you need intellectual CPR!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are to the point that you need intellectual CPR!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rivera</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19522</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19522</guid>
		<description>&#8226; Refugee Assistance: $343 million, $50 million above the request, &#8230;including humanitarian assistance for Gaza. Funding for the UN Relief and Works Agency programs in the West Bank and Gaza is limited to $119 million (Note: Gaza = Hamas) 
 
&#8226; Disaster Assistance: $200 million to avert famines and provide life-saving assistance during natural disasters and for internally displaced people around the world, including Somalia, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, the Middle East and South Asia 
 
&#8226; Peacekeeping: $837 million for United Nations peacekeeping operations, including an expanded mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a new mission in Chad and the Central African Republic 
 
&#8226; HIV/AIDS: $100 million, $100 million above the request, for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to address a funding shortfall for grants in key countries such as Haiti, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Afghanistan. (Note: That means Obama&#8217;s original request didn&#8217;t include any money for AIDs) 
 
&#8226; Africa: $151 million, $18 million above the request, for economic and security assistance for Kenya, Somalia, Southern Sudan, and Zimbabwe 
 
&#8226; Mexico: $470 million, $404 million above the request, to address growing violence along the United States-Mexico border by supporting the Government of Mexico&#8217;s war against organized crime and drug-trafficking 
 
&#8226; Georgia: $242 million to fulfill the United States commitment to the people of Georgia 
 
&#8226; Global Financial Crisis: $300 million, $148 million below the request, to address the global financial crisis in developing countries 
 
&#8226; Nuclear Non-Proliferation: $55 million, $34.5 million below the request, for the National Nuclear Security Administration to safeguard nuclear material in Russia and other sites world-wide 
 
&#8226; Department of Justice: $17 million, matching the request, for counter-terrorism activities and to provide training and assistance for the Iraqi criminal justice system 
 
Updates: 
 
Mass media remains silent on this but the International News has now picked up the story 
 
&#8230;and then there is Obama&#8217;s $108 billion IMF bailout scheme in addition to the Supplemental 
 
Related: 
 
To really add insult to injury, check our previous Creeping Sharia post &#8211; Obama asks Congress to allow U.S. funds to terrorist Hamas govt 
 
The Obama administration has asked Congress to let aid to Palestinians continue if Hamas backers are included in a new unity government, observers say. The proposed change in U.S. law would be necessary because Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, is designated as a terrorist organization and therefore cannot receive U.S. aid. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/obamas-supplemental-bill-passes-gives-billions-to-enemies/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/ob...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Whilst the U.S. is broke. Whilst homeless shelters are filled to capacity and desperate jobless and homeless, NEGLECTED Americans are living in tent cities, billions are gifted to highly favored Muslims. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&bull; Refugee Assistance: $343 million, $50 million above the request, &hellip;including humanitarian assistance for Gaza. Funding for the UN Relief and Works Agency programs in the West Bank and Gaza is limited to $119 million (Note: Gaza = Hamas) </p>
<p>&bull; Disaster Assistance: $200 million to avert famines and provide life-saving assistance during natural disasters and for internally displaced people around the world, including Somalia, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, the Middle East and South Asia </p>
<p>&bull; Peacekeeping: $837 million for United Nations peacekeeping operations, including an expanded mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a new mission in Chad and the Central African Republic </p>
<p>&bull; HIV/AIDS: $100 million, $100 million above the request, for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to address a funding shortfall for grants in key countries such as Haiti, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Afghanistan. (Note: That means Obama&rsquo;s original request didn&rsquo;t include any money for AIDs) </p>
<p>&bull; Africa: $151 million, $18 million above the request, for economic and security assistance for Kenya, Somalia, Southern Sudan, and Zimbabwe </p>
<p>&bull; Mexico: $470 million, $404 million above the request, to address growing violence along the United States-Mexico border by supporting the Government of Mexico&rsquo;s war against organized crime and drug-trafficking </p>
<p>&bull; Georgia: $242 million to fulfill the United States commitment to the people of Georgia </p>
<p>&bull; Global Financial Crisis: $300 million, $148 million below the request, to address the global financial crisis in developing countries </p>
<p>&bull; Nuclear Non-Proliferation: $55 million, $34.5 million below the request, for the National Nuclear Security Administration to safeguard nuclear material in Russia and other sites world-wide </p>
<p>&bull; Department of Justice: $17 million, matching the request, for counter-terrorism activities and to provide training and assistance for the Iraqi criminal justice system </p>
<p>Updates: </p>
<p>Mass media remains silent on this but the International News has now picked up the story </p>
<p>&hellip;and then there is Obama&rsquo;s $108 billion IMF bailout scheme in addition to the Supplemental </p>
<p>Related: </p>
<p>To really add insult to injury, check our previous Creeping Sharia post &ndash; Obama asks Congress to allow U.S. funds to terrorist Hamas govt </p>
<p>The Obama administration has asked Congress to let aid to Palestinians continue if Hamas backers are included in a new unity government, observers say. The proposed change in U.S. law would be necessary because Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, is designated as a terrorist organization and therefore cannot receive U.S. aid.<br />
<a href="http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/obamas-supplemental-bill-passes-gives-billions-to-enemies/" target="_blank">http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/ob&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Whilst the U.S. is broke. Whilst homeless shelters are filled to capacity and desperate jobless and homeless, NEGLECTED Americans are living in tent cities, billions are gifted to highly favored Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rivera</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19521</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19521</guid>
		<description>U.S. BROKE, but BILLIONS for Muslim FAVORITES 
 
DRUDGE REPORT 
&#039;WE&#039;RE OUT OF MONEY&#039; 
May 23 2009 
 
In a sobering holiday interview with C-SPAN, President Obama boldly told Americans: &quot;We are out of money.&quot; 
 
SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money? 
 
OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drudgereport.com/flashocs.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.drudgereport.com/flashocs.htm&lt;/a&gt; 
 
CREEPINGSHARIA.COM 
Obama&#8217;s Supplemental Bill Passes, Gives Billions to Enemies? 
By creeping 
 
Barack Obama&#8217;s 2009 Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Pandemic Flu was revised and &#8220;passed by the full committee&#8221;. Not sure what the next step is, but based on the summary, it gives billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to countries and entities that support sharia law and/or harbor, hide and support those who want to destroy the U.S. and our allies. 
 
Read the summary from David Obey&#8217;s office that was quietly released last week with nary a word from any media. 
 
&#8226; $3.6 billion, matching the request, to expand and improve capabilities of the Afghan security forces 
 
&#8226; $400 million, as requested, to build the counterinsurgency capabilities of the Pakistani security forces 
 
&#8226; Afghanistan: $1.52 billion, $86 million above the request 
 
&#8226; West Bank and Gaza: $665 million in bilateral economic, humanitarian, and security assistance for the West Bank and Gaza 
 
&#8226; Jordan: $250 million, $250 million above the request, including $100 million for economic and $150 million for security assistance 
 
&#8226; Egypt: $360 million, $310 million above the request, including $50 million for economic assistance, $50 million for border security, and $260 million for security assistance 
 
&#8226; Pakistan: $1.9 billion, $591 million above the request 
 
&#8226; Iraq: $968 million, $336 million above the request 
 
&#8226; Oversight: $20 million, $13 million above the request, to expand oversight capacity of the State Department, USAID, and the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan to review programs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq 
 
&#8226; Israel: $555 million of the $2.8 billion 2010 request for security assistance, $555 million above the supplemental request. (Note: that means Obama&#8217;s original request did not include any money for Israel in 2009) 
 
&#8226; Lebanon: $74 million 
 
&#8226; International Food Assistance: $500 million, $200 million above the request, for PL 480 international food assistance to alleviate suffering during the global economic crisis </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. BROKE, but BILLIONS for Muslim FAVORITES </p>
<p>DRUDGE REPORT<br />
&#039;WE&#039;RE OUT OF MONEY&#039;<br />
May 23 2009 </p>
<p>In a sobering holiday interview with C-SPAN, President Obama boldly told Americans: &quot;We are out of money.&quot; </p>
<p>SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money? </p>
<p>OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits<br />
<a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flashocs.htm" target="_blank">http://www.drudgereport.com/flashocs.htm</a> </p>
<p>CREEPINGSHARIA.COM<br />
Obama&rsquo;s Supplemental Bill Passes, Gives Billions to Enemies?<br />
By creeping </p>
<p>Barack Obama&rsquo;s 2009 Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Pandemic Flu was revised and &ldquo;passed by the full committee&rdquo;. Not sure what the next step is, but based on the summary, it gives billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to countries and entities that support sharia law and/or harbor, hide and support those who want to destroy the U.S. and our allies. </p>
<p>Read the summary from David Obey&rsquo;s office that was quietly released last week with nary a word from any media. </p>
<p>&bull; $3.6 billion, matching the request, to expand and improve capabilities of the Afghan security forces </p>
<p>&bull; $400 million, as requested, to build the counterinsurgency capabilities of the Pakistani security forces </p>
<p>&bull; Afghanistan: $1.52 billion, $86 million above the request </p>
<p>&bull; West Bank and Gaza: $665 million in bilateral economic, humanitarian, and security assistance for the West Bank and Gaza </p>
<p>&bull; Jordan: $250 million, $250 million above the request, including $100 million for economic and $150 million for security assistance </p>
<p>&bull; Egypt: $360 million, $310 million above the request, including $50 million for economic assistance, $50 million for border security, and $260 million for security assistance </p>
<p>&bull; Pakistan: $1.9 billion, $591 million above the request </p>
<p>&bull; Iraq: $968 million, $336 million above the request </p>
<p>&bull; Oversight: $20 million, $13 million above the request, to expand oversight capacity of the State Department, USAID, and the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan to review programs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq </p>
<p>&bull; Israel: $555 million of the $2.8 billion 2010 request for security assistance, $555 million above the supplemental request. (Note: that means Obama&rsquo;s original request did not include any money for Israel in 2009) </p>
<p>&bull; Lebanon: $74 million </p>
<p>&bull; International Food Assistance: $500 million, $200 million above the request, for PL 480 international food assistance to alleviate suffering during the global economic crisis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rivera</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19518</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19518</guid>
		<description> 
Watch it. And weep for our great nation and people. 
 
FALL Of The Republic - The Presidency Of Barack H Obama - The Full Movie HQ 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8&amp;feature=player_embedded&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8&amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch it. And weep for our great nation and people. </p>
<p>FALL Of The Republic &#8211; The Presidency Of Barack H Obama &#8211; The Full Movie HQ<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8LPNRI_6T8&#038;fe&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rivera</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19517</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19517</guid>
		<description>The highly destructive Cap and Trade. An inferior healthcare plan that no one wants and cannot afford to pay. The threat to jail and/or fine those who don&#039;t purchase the government enforced plan. The constant printing of money. Massive spending as if there is no tomorrow. Massive debt. There is no question that the total DESTRUCTION of America&#039;s economy is planned. The results will be horrifying. In the once wealthy and great nation of America, millions of Americans will become destitute, hungry and homeless with no money or resources to help them. 
 
Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load &#8216;Unsustainable&#8217; 
By Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols 
 
May 14 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending &#8220;unsustainable,&#8221; warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries. 
 
&#8220;We can&#8217;t keep on just borrowing from China,&#8221; Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. &#8220;We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children&#8217;s future with more and more debt.&#8221; 
 
Holders of U.S. debt will eventually &#8220;get tired&#8221; of buying it, causing interest rates on everything from auto loans to home mortgages to increase, Obama said. &#8220;It will have a dampening effect on our economy.&#8221;... 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aJsSb4qtILhg&amp;refer=worldwide&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;a...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Obama admits the terrible financial destruction wrought against Americans. WHY THEN DOES OBAMA NOT IMMEDIATELY REVERSE THIS TRAGEDY? 
 
A major investor states America is going to reach Zimbabwe hyperinflation. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2942&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2942&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Billions of dollars urgently needed for America&#039;s defense is instead gifted to Islam. Nuclear Iran and nuclear North Korea both state they intend to destroy America. They are not idle threats. The same venomous hate for the U.S. is shared by other nations and Muslim terrorist organizations. The treasonous response of the U.S. government to America&#039;s increasing danger, is to drastically reduce our defenses facilitating America&#039;s annihilation. 
 
See: Aloha, &quot;Star Wars&quot;  By: Washington Times Editorial 
Washington Times &#124; Monday, June 29, 2009 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35383&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTI...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The highly destructive Cap and Trade. An inferior healthcare plan that no one wants and cannot afford to pay. The threat to jail and/or fine those who don&#039;t purchase the government enforced plan. The constant printing of money. Massive spending as if there is no tomorrow. Massive debt. There is no question that the total DESTRUCTION of America&#039;s economy is planned. The results will be horrifying. In the once wealthy and great nation of America, millions of Americans will become destitute, hungry and homeless with no money or resources to help them. </p>
<p>Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load &lsquo;Unsustainable&rsquo;<br />
By Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols </p>
<p>May 14 (Bloomberg) &#8212; President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending &ldquo;unsustainable,&rdquo; warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries. </p>
<p>&ldquo;We can&rsquo;t keep on just borrowing from China,&rdquo; Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. &ldquo;We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children&rsquo;s future with more and more debt.&rdquo; </p>
<p>Holders of U.S. debt will eventually &ldquo;get tired&rdquo; of buying it, causing interest rates on everything from auto loans to home mortgages to increase, Obama said. &ldquo;It will have a dampening effect on our economy.&rdquo;&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aJsSb4qtILhg&amp;refer=worldwide" target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;a&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Obama admits the terrible financial destruction wrought against Americans. WHY THEN DOES OBAMA NOT IMMEDIATELY REVERSE THIS TRAGEDY? </p>
<p>A major investor states America is going to reach Zimbabwe hyperinflation.<br />
<a href="http://economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2942" target="_blank">http://economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2942</a> </p>
<p>Billions of dollars urgently needed for America&#039;s defense is instead gifted to Islam. Nuclear Iran and nuclear North Korea both state they intend to destroy America. They are not idle threats. The same venomous hate for the U.S. is shared by other nations and Muslim terrorist organizations. The treasonous response of the U.S. government to America&#039;s increasing danger, is to drastically reduce our defenses facilitating America&#039;s annihilation. </p>
<p>See: Aloha, &quot;Star Wars&quot;  By: Washington Times Editorial<br />
Washington Times | Monday, June 29, 2009<br />
<a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35383" target="_blank">http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTI&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rivera</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19514</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19514</guid>
		<description>To bubba4  
 
Your racist comment calling the president a &quot;darky&quot; is disgusting. It is character NOT the color of skin that is important! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bubba4  </p>
<p>Your racist comment calling the president a &quot;darky&quot; is disgusting. It is character NOT the color of skin that is important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba4</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19489</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19489</guid>
		<description>So Reagan didn&#039;t create more debt? Come on! 
 
&quot;voodoo economics&quot; was the laffer curve...the idea that if you brought taxes down on the rich, then the economy would explode, driven by the trickle down of prosperity. I guess you can avoid any uncomfortable facts about these ideas by simply believing that it all worked out brilliantly.  
 
It didn&#039;t. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Reagan didn&#039;t create more debt? Come on! </p>
<p>&quot;voodoo economics&quot; was the laffer curve&#8230;the idea that if you brought taxes down on the rich, then the economy would explode, driven by the trickle down of prosperity. I guess you can avoid any uncomfortable facts about these ideas by simply believing that it all worked out brilliantly.  </p>
<p>It didn&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba4</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19487</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19487</guid>
		<description>Vasko just barrels ahead without regard for truth or consequence....of which there is none for him. He can say whatever he wants. This is the latest in a string of articles that give new meaning to spin. The number keeps getting bigger. In another few months, Obama will be driving us to $ googleplex deficits... 
 
For Vasko, all this will become more reasonable once the darky is out of the whitehouse. When we get a Republican in there, then the deficits will be managable, and there will be plenty of excuses and good reasons to give the rich new tax cuts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vasko just barrels ahead without regard for truth or consequence&#8230;.of which there is none for him. He can say whatever he wants. This is the latest in a string of articles that give new meaning to spin. The number keeps getting bigger. In another few months, Obama will be driving us to $ googleplex deficits&#8230; </p>
<p>For Vasko, all this will become more reasonable once the darky is out of the whitehouse. When we get a Republican in there, then the deficits will be managable, and there will be plenty of excuses and good reasons to give the rich new tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johncarens</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19446</link>
		<dc:creator>johncarens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19446</guid>
		<description>We have a rouge, out-of-control Federal Government, and worse, the Party of Government is in control. The modern Democrat Party is representative only of public-sector unions, Government Employees, and others who benefit from extorting money from the taxpayer&#039;s treasury. Thus, the budgets of governmental entities at all levels (states and localities are a fiscal disaster, too) grow inexorably. And year after year, governments are never satisfied, never slaked. And every year, taxpayers are treated to a slew of incalculable waste and fraud. Now, however, Uncle Sam seems to be one of those morbidly obese hospital patients whose organs are shutting down one by one, but whose mother keeps sneaking in the fried chicken and milk shakes. It is sick, truly sick. And the governments&#039; sense of arrogance and entitlement to the taxpayers property is stunningly frightening.  
 
In good times, the Government grows. In bad times, the Government grows. There has never been a federal budget that was less in actual terms than the year before. And its amazing how quickly we accept the latest &quot;normal&quot;: In 1993, Bill Clinton&#039;s &quot;Stimulus&quot; was a mere $47 billion dollars. And George HW Bush labeled &quot;voodoo economics&quot; Reagan&#039;s first budgetary proposal that, he felt, might generate a $40-billion deficit (which, of course, it didn&#039;t-- it increased revenues as Reagan said it would). 
 
We are over the brink now, folks. We&#039;re just waiting for the math to catch up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a rouge, out-of-control Federal Government, and worse, the Party of Government is in control. The modern Democrat Party is representative only of public-sector unions, Government Employees, and others who benefit from extorting money from the taxpayer&#039;s treasury. Thus, the budgets of governmental entities at all levels (states and localities are a fiscal disaster, too) grow inexorably. And year after year, governments are never satisfied, never slaked. And every year, taxpayers are treated to a slew of incalculable waste and fraud. Now, however, Uncle Sam seems to be one of those morbidly obese hospital patients whose organs are shutting down one by one, but whose mother keeps sneaking in the fried chicken and milk shakes. It is sick, truly sick. And the governments&#039; sense of arrogance and entitlement to the taxpayers property is stunningly frightening.  </p>
<p>In good times, the Government grows. In bad times, the Government grows. There has never been a federal budget that was less in actual terms than the year before. And its amazing how quickly we accept the latest &quot;normal&quot;: In 1993, Bill Clinton&#039;s &quot;Stimulus&quot; was a mere $47 billion dollars. And George HW Bush labeled &quot;voodoo economics&quot; Reagan&#039;s first budgetary proposal that, he felt, might generate a $40-billion deficit (which, of course, it didn&#039;t&#8211; it increased revenues as Reagan said it would). </p>
<p>We are over the brink now, folks. We&#039;re just waiting for the math to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A New Era of Responsibility? &#171; Truth2Freedom&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19420</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Era of Responsibility? &#171; Truth2Freedom&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19420</guid>
		<description>[...] 9, 2010 in Truth2Freedom Headline Alerts    http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)A New Era Of ResponsibilityObama Inaugural Speech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9, 2010 in Truth2Freedom Headline Alerts    <a href="http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/" rel="nofollow">http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/</a> Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)A New Era Of ResponsibilityObama Inaugural Speech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/09/a-new-era-of-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-19403</link>
		<dc:creator>Rifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=49343#comment-19403</guid>
		<description>The $23 billion cut is a diversion from the extra $800+ billion the dp is blowing.   The dp idea of responsibility is to spend 2 to 4 times as much as the GOP. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $23 billion cut is a diversion from the extra $800+ billion the dp is blowing.   The dp idea of responsibility is to spend 2 to 4 times as much as the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

