A Judeo-Muslim Civilization?

Posted by Bio ↓ on May 14th, 2010 Comments ↓

A conference at the University of California, Berkeley, on April 28-29, 2010 (and continued at UC Davis on April 30), “Muslims and Jews Together: Seeing From Without; Seeing From Within,” was billed as a major international symposium for “the inauguration of the Program for the Study of Muslim-Jewish Relations at UC Berkeley and the establishment of a UC-wide and West Coast working group for the study of Muslim-Jewish relations .”

The conference was a collaborative effort between the Center for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES) at UC Berkeley and the Jewish Studies Program at UC Davis. Its stated purpose was to use the frameworks of traditional Middle East studies and Jewish studies to develop a new academic field focused on the historical interaction between Muslims and the Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews who once lived among them. Most of the participants were historians or anthropologists specializing in North African Jewry, particularly Morocco.

CMES chair Nezar AlSayyad introduced the conference with a discussion about “building bridges” by re-framing the term, “Jews of Islam,” into something that could be equated with Judeo-Christian civilization: something he called “Judeo-Muslim civilization.” CMES vice-chair and conference organizer Emily Gottreich echoed AlSayyed’s comments in her introduction to the first panel, describing the “Jews of Islam” as “an awkward and unfortunate” construction and seconding the notion of “Judeo-Muslim civilization.”

The emphasis throughout this first panel, which was titled “Framing,” was on synthesis, symbiosis, and challenging “the dichotomy.”  How does one teach about Jews in a Muslim country and teach about Muslims in a Jewish country? The first part of the question, however, cannot be answered, because very few Jews remain in the same Muslim countries where, prior to 1948, there were large, ancient communities. The reason for this exodus—the forced removal of Jews in response to Israel’s founding that year—went unexamined by panelists.

Oren Kosansky, an anthropology professor at Lewis & Clark College in Portland, Oregon, and the first speaker on this panel, brought up the concept of the dhimmi: the historical subservient, second class citizenship of Jews and other minorities in Muslim lands. Although dhimmi legal status entailed a whole series of humiliations and penalties for Arab Jews, Kosansky did not elaborate on the details. He claimed that the research on dhimmi status was “overstated” and that an “overly dyadic picture has been drawn, and relationships in daily life have been under-emphasized.” Religious identity was not the only identity, he continued, as there was also economic, gender, regional, and class identities. In what seemed to me a Western-centric omission, he left out clan or tribal identity. Kosansky then claimed that the “emergence of Zionism exaggerated the differences” between Moroccan Jews and Muslims. In fact, the function of Zionism was to rescue these Jews from intolerable environments.

During the discussion period for this panel, Lital Levy, assistant professor of comparative literature at Princeton University and a panelist at the UC Davis “Muslim-Jewish” conference, contradicted Kosansky. She disagreed that Zionism had resulted in an exaggeration of differences, and she pointed out that Jews who had converted to Islam were still considered Jews. It was, she maintained, an identity, a specificity that stuck to the individual in the Middle East over many centuries. She asked for a comment, but none of the panelists were willing to respond.

Daniel Tsadik, an assistant professor of Sephardic and Iranian Studies at Yeshiva University in New York and a visiting assistant professor at the Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism, spoke next on the first panel. He claimed that the emphasis on religion blurs other, more significant, factors, and said he wished scholars would focus more on the reality of Jews and Muslims living together in a given place and as members of one society, rather than as majorities or minorities.

Tsadik questioned whether the framework of “Jews in Muslim lands” focuses on a true common denominator. He lamented the alleged political agenda of Jewish scholars attempting to “know the enemy,” as well as the dependence on written texts, which, he worried, could create unbalanced data. As an example, he brought up the edicts of the Iranian ulema (Muslim legal scholars), which record all the fatwas against Jews, thereby providing written evidence of a bleak fate. However, this “bleak fate” isn’t too far from the truth.

The major theme the following morning at the second panel, “Problematizing,” was to get beyond the Arab-Israeli conflict, or what participants described simply as “the Conflict.” Almost uniformly, speakers reiterated that “the Conflict” was not the eternal metaphor or model for the 1,400 year history of Muslim-Jewish relations; rather, it was a distorting mirror.

Nonetheless, there were plenty of distortions of “the Conflict” on this panel. Joel Beinin, Stanford University history professor and well-known anti-Zionist, claimed that Iraqi Jews fled to Israel in 1950-51 due to “collusion between the Israeli state and the Iraqi government of the time.” He offered no explanation or historical record of this alleged “collusion.”

It should be noted that Beinin was one of the signatories to a statement from California faculty members (posted at the website for the “U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel”) urging the UC Berkeley student senate to vote “yes” on a divestment bill. Fellow signatory, UC Berkeley Jewish studies professor Daniel Boyarin, chaired the second panel.

Matthias Lehmann, associate professor of history and Jewish studies at Indiana University, lamented that the conflict is always perceived as religious when it’s actually—according to his view and that espoused regularly by anti-Israel propagandists—between two nationalisms. To consider it a religious conflict, he continued, is “anachronistic, ahistorical, and irrelevant.” He said nothing about the role of radical Islam in furthering strife. Extending this theme, Sami Shalom Chetrit, a Mizrahi professor at Hebrew University who recited his poetry at the conference, said that calling it a religious conflict was “the big tragedy.”

During the roundtable portion of the second panel, Lehmann did question the lack of commentary—in a discussion by UC Irvine history professor Marc Baer on Jewish to Muslim conversions that conveniently left out the concept of dhimmi— on power differentials. Panel chair Daniel Boyarin softly interjected that power differentials depended upon whether the location was “Dar al-Harb” (house of war) or “Dar al-Islam” (house of Islam), to which the audience laughed knowingly. No one pointed out that Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam are religious concepts that just might relate to the supposedly non-religious conflict.

Considering the downplaying of such important concepts, one has to wonder if future students in the Program for the Study of Muslim-Jewish Relations will be able to ask questions pertaining to apostasy, infidels, honor killings, Jews as “apes and pigs,” or global jihad?  In addition, will the program offer an equal number of scholars to represent both Jews and Muslims?

The makeup of the conference certainly did not inspire confidence. The brochure stated that “scholars of Middle Eastern Studies have returned—after a long hiatus—to re-discover the importance of non-Muslims within Muslim societies,” leading one to expect an inter-faith dialog. Yet, the panels consisted mostly of Jewish academics—a pattern that predominates at Muslim-Jewish inter-faith conferences.

During the reception, I pointed this out to Susan Miller, UC Davis history professor and one of the conference organizers,  and she replied that it was “not an inter-faith conference, but an academic conference, and that is who is here. It is irrelevant who they are; what matters is what they say.” In other words, she skirted the issue.

There was only one Muslim panelist on the two panels I attended: Mohammed Kenbib, a specialist in Moroccan Jewish history at Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco. At the reception I raised this omission to him directly by stating that “there should be more Muslims here.” To my surprise, he responded by leaning towards me and lightly kissing me on the forehead. “This is quite a warm, fuzzy event,” I said, smiling. His response was profound: “We are very far from the Middle East here.”

Indeed, and so too is the Program for the Study of Muslim-Jewish Relations.

Rima Greene wrote this article for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.

About

84 Responses for “A Judeo-Muslim Civilization?”

  1. Utopian says:

    Arabs are descendants of a man named Ishmael, the son of Abraham. Both the Jews and Arabs come from the loins of Abraham. But each son had a different mother: one was his wife and the other a slave. It is the slave that hates the free and the blessed. It is written, "And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him." Genesis 16:12. But in the end Ishmael worshiped the God of Abraham, not the god of Muhammad called allah. Therefore, Muslims dishonor their father Ishmael in violation of the 5th Commandment.

    • Toma says:

      Arabs are descended from Ishmael?Syrians,Lebanese,Iraqis,Palestinians,Egyptians,ecs are all descended from Israel?Before Abraham the entire Middle East was empty?And ALL Jews,Europeans,Chinese,Indian and Middle Easterner Jews, are all descended from Isaac?You are an utter moron.Go get some help.

      • Toma says:

        Sorry,descended from Ishmael

      • Toma says:

        What about the majority of Middle Eastern Jews,who over time converted to Islam?

      • michiganruth says:

        there's a book that might help you understand the situation better. it's called "The Bible"–ever heard of it?

        it lays the whole thing out pretty well.

        you don't have to believe it, but to call people who do "morons" indicates to me that it is YOU who could use the "help."

        • Toma says:

          You take an ancient book of myth and isolate a completely preposterous laughable racial theory, in order to prove a racist elititst condenscending claim about slaves and "the free" and i shouldnt call you a moron?You are not a moron when you to try to prove such construct categories as Jews and Arabs, which every NORMAL person should know are not racial identities, by looking at the Bible?Do you know how many Palestinians can trace their ancestry and culture back to the semitic Jews of Judea?How many Iraqis,Syrians and Lebanese are descended from Jews?

      • michalha says:

        From what one can glean in newspapers around the world, TV and other media, the terms "Muslim" and "civilization" appear to be an oxymoron.

    • hannah 33 says:

      this is correct if we are on the verge of quotes about death of a loved one

  2. Victoria says:

    So, essentially this was a complete waste of time! No one dared to discuss real issues, real history or the truth.

  3. 9-11 Infidel says:

    From what one can glean in newspapers around the world, TV and other media, the terms "Muslim" and "civilization" appear to be an oxymoron.

    No discussion of the god of Islam and their prophet's undying hatred of the Jews either?

    Its what one expects from a multicultural elite that cannot bring itself to link Islam with the jihadist mindset. Perhaps they were looking for the elusive moderate Islamic?

    Man who lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas.

  4. cockon you.? says:

    vay isht meir??

  5. Raymond in DC says:

    There you have it folks. A gathering of overpaid, tenured ideologues claiming to be "scholars". What utter rubbish!

    To start with, it was not a Judeo-Muslim civilization. It was an empire encompassing Jews, Muslims, Christians and Copts, Bahais and Zoroastrians and Hindus (yes, there are more I haven't listed), with the Muslims always in charge. Second to ignore the tribal, imperial and religious components of that empire is to ignore its most critical elements. Dhimmitude itself was based on the underlying distinction between believers and non-believers, and jihad was (and remains) a religious mandate.

    And by now we should not expect left-wing, multi-culti "Jewish" scholars to expound intelligently on anything related to Jews or Israel.

  6. reedi01 says:

    First, it wasn't your Judeo-Muslim world. It absolutely was a great kingdom encompassing Jews, Muslims, Christians in addition to Copts, Bahais plus Zoroastrians as well as Hindus (yes, san francisco spa I've not detailed), using the Muslims always in demand. Minute to disregard the actual tribe, imperial in addition to religious parts of that will kingdom is to ignore it's most critical elements. Dhimmitude themselves was based on the main big difference in between followers in addition to non-believers, plus jihad had been (and remains) a spiritual require.
    auto insurance quotes

  7. Mark says:

    Sometimes working side by side can be a great leveler, we all have to do tasks like house cleaning even if we outsource most of it the types of spaces we occupy share many of the same characteristics.

  8. lisap says:

    Its 2011 there shouldnt be any hatred towards different religions and cultures. We are all different and we should all respect each other as individuals with individual beliefs and idiologies. Lisa free credit report

  9. chasemewhen says:

    I'd be surprised if more of these types of events don't become more common. As the west becomes more understanding of opposing viewpoints we can focus less on preventing attacks on civilians and more on our infrastructure–such as handling train derailments.

  10. Kklynch says:

    It would seem that "To focus more on the reality of Jews and Muslims living together in a given place and as members of one society, rather than as majorities or minorities" would be more beneficial to both sides at this point in history.
    Karen
    webmaster @ watch movies online free

  11. Hanna says:

    strongly i also agree with shelback that the united states will not should have a give up of its troops along with marine corps anymore. We've got a new fragile, in a soft state, equivocating region, not capable of appreciating, or perhaps defending alone, it has the is bordered by, its customs as well as ways of life. Essay Help

  12. OretiMayo says:

    It has been well recognized that economic education field has been one of the most favorite education fields in the post secondary education in vietnam. Probably there is a good reason to it. I am sure there are more and more young people would love to continue their education in this university.party bus toronto

  13. Bob133 says:

    It would seem that "To focus more on the reality of Jews and Muslims living together in a given place and as members of one society, rather than as majorities or minorities" would be more beneficial cheap cell phones

  14. Nida JANJUA says:

    I have to admit that I have never heard about this information I have noticed many new facts for me. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful and attractive information and I will be waiting for other interesting posts from you in the nearest future.keep it up.
    Jailbreak ios 5

  15. Nida Ali says:

    The said post here is very informative. I am impressed as to the ways in which the author delivered the message to us readers. I am curious as to the details and have read and got my answers to my query. It is nice to know that this one here really exist. I would love to track your future posts. iPhone 5

  16. To start with, it was not a Judeo-Muslim civilization. It was an empire encompassing Jews, Muslims, Christians and Copts, Bahais and Zoroastrians and Hindus (yes, there are more I haven't listed), with the Muslims always in charge. Second to ignore the tribal, imperial and religious components of that empire is to ignore its most critical elements. Dhimmitude itself was based on the underlying distinction between believers and non-believers, and jihad was (and remains) a religious mandate.
    how to make a solar panel

  17. We are all different and we should all respect each other as individuals with individual beliefs and idiologies.

  18. After reading your post I really come to know what your topic really is.

  19. UtariJot says:

    I should see something like this as a good chance for me to learn what are those related with what we can do to improve the ability of this movie characteristic. I am sure this is something that we can do to improve the quality.Sleep Lab in Los Angeles

  20. This is really great stuff for an article, this topic is very interesting.
    Keep it up with this line of content, thanks for sharing this post !

  21. IAO says:

    Nice post dude

    • Free Calls says:

      Your content is very useful. Thank you so much for providing plenty of useful content. I have bookmarked your site and will be without doubt coming back. Once again, I appreciate all your work and also providing a lot vital tricks for your readers.

  22. Such posts are rare now adays

  23. diplomas says:

    Worth reading and bookmarking

  24. Apollosan says:

    The information about this disease has been there and available for us to use it. I am sure people of this country would benefit from the existence of this information in their hand. I want to make some kind of compiled documents about this. tenant screening

  25. backpack says:

    That is really a nice idea. It's nice that they have thought about that kind of way. Thanks for sharing this information.

  26. Kuzey Guney says:

    I have to admit that I have never heard about this information Kuzey Güney I have noticed many new facts for me. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful and attractive information and I will be waiting for other interesting posts from you in the nearest future.keep it up.

  27. I think such a mutual cooperation will never be possible

  28. Yalan Dünya says:

    I should see something like this as a good chance for me to learn what are those related with what we can do to improve the ability of this movie characteristic. I am sure this is something that we can do to improve the quality ..This is really great stuff for an article, this topic is very interesting.
    Keep it up with this line of content, thanks for sharing this post ! Kuzey Ve Güney

  29. john310 says:

    You got a really useful blog. I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me. 70-630|

  30. Eid Messages says:

    i really like this post

  31. That is really a nice idea. It’s nice that they have thought about that kind of way. Thanks for sharing this information.

  32. It’s a nice sharing.

  33. I think such a mutual cooperation will never be possible

  34. As a world-leading wholesale company, we supply more than 100 thousand high-quality merchandise and famous brand name products, all at wholesale prices. Experience professional service and quality products made in China right now.

  35. Richard Orils says:

    Keep it up with this line of content, thanks for sharing this post ! The information about this disease has been there and available for us to use it. website templates

  36. Hi, this is really satisfied by the different technology is visible in this blog. I love this info in this blog that to utilize the great services.

  37. RiggBekham says:

    I would like to convey my admiration for your generosity in support of men and women that have the need for help with this particular concern. Your special dedication to getting the message all over had been wonderfully productive and have all the time made professionals much like me to attain their dreams. Your own invaluable tutorial means a great deal to me and additionally to my office workers. Thank you; from everyone of us. unreported marketing review

    xtreme paydays review

    epic commissions review

  38. even if we are on different civilization, we must respect each other

  39. enricomertin says:

    das judentum ist eine schlimme rassistische organisation http://www.wunder-der-schwangerschaft.de/

  40. The author really has done a fantastic job in putting this blog together. Thanks……

  41. Wow awesome post ,Thanks for sharing great review .

    • Watch Real Steel Online says:

      Cheap Gucci Handbags Is usually blogengine much better than wp for reasons unknown? Should be which is turning out to be popluar today.
      Heya i’m for the first time here. I found this board and I to find It truly helpful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to provide something back and aid others such as you helped me.

  42. trailer says:

    California Uni. is the best school

  43. Dans le cas où un individu a tendance à être fatigués avec un style de vie immuable de chaque semaine, il ou elle peut se penser s'engager dans autre chose

  44. Pornoseiten says:

    Great article. Thank you for sharing

  45. MP4 speler says:

    this is very njce blog.

  46. I like how peace talks go as well as when different religions are in understanding with one another. A Judeo Muslim Civilization would be nice and I hope that the rest of the world would follow to avoid future conflicts and misunderstandings.
    buy car insurance

  47. mobile-phone says:

    some things are same of the boths,
    1. We worship the same G-d
    2. We are descendents of Abraham
    3. Our Males are circumcised according to Abrahamic law
    4. Both cultures are of Semitic origin
    5. Jerusalem is our Holy City
    6. We stress good works over faith.
    7. We share many advances in medicine; philosophy; law; literature and poetry.
    8. There are extremists and peacemakers on both sides.
    9. We are descendents of Abraham
    10. We worship the same G-d
    Mobile Phone Prices

Leave a Reply



Subscribe to FPM

SUBSCRIBE TO FPM: Email RSS Comments Twitter
Log in | Copyright© 2012 FrontPageMagazine.com