Toledo federal Judge James Carr today sentenced Khaleel Ahmed of Chicago, to 8 years, four months, and Zubair Ahmed of suburban North Chicago to 10 years. Both pleaded guilty in January 2009 to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.
Hmmm. Khaleel Ahmed and Zubair Ahmed. What an odd coincidence: both names strongly suggest that these two are adherents of the Religion of Peace™! Yet Barack Obama and John Brennan tell us that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. Brennan said in May that “describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism, that the United States is somehow at war against Islam.” He said that using Islamic terms to describe the enemy “would actually be counterproductive. It would play into the false perception that they are religious leaders defending a holy cause, when in fact they are nothing more than murderers, including the murder of thousands upon thousands of Muslims.”
But of course, they portray themselves as religious leaders defending a holy cause, and they are widely perceived as such among Muslims, and have Islamic texts and teachings to establish their case. Is it really wise to pretend that that isn’t the case? Nonetheless, as this is the prevailing dogma to which all must adhere, AP doesn’t even come close to mentioning the possibility that it could have had anything to do with their motivations.
Authorities say the men once traveled to Egypt with the intent to commit violence and that they met with an FBI informant and talked about learning to shoot machine guns and sniper rifles.
Egypt, eh? How odd. One would think that one of the many peaceful adherents of Islam in Egypt would have stopped them there.
In any case, the AP story, like all other mainstream media stories, leaves the reader thoroughly unequipped to understand why the Ahmed cousins got involved in this plot, and what they hoped to accomplish. No wonder the state of awareness about the jihad threat in America is so abysmally low today.
Shall we expect reports where the two cousins suggest their plotting is not the issue. Destruction/elimination of a national entity, the product of the Balfour Declaration of 1948, would make their plotting, and that of many other cousins, unnecessary.
The Left is in alliance with Islam and the Left has also hijacked the so-called MSM. Hence, of course, they are going to conceal the truth as much as they can, as they are also part of the problem.
Nevertheless, Islam like Communism is a radical form of totalitarianism that seeks world domination, and the Global Jihad is the new Cold War of this century. Hence, just like we didn’t let millions of Communists immigrate and infiltrate into our country during the Cold war because it would have been suicidal, we shouldn’t be letting millions of Muslims immigrate and infiltrate our countries today because it is likewise suicidal.
With the West locked in conflicts across the Muslim world, why would anyone throw fuel on the fire?
Yeah, you'll want to read this one sitting down.
A small group of Europeans have been doing just that — provoking death plots and at least one murder by turning out art that derides the Prophet Muhammad and the Quran in the name of Western values.
Behind the scenes is something bigger: a rising European unease with a rapidly growing Muslim minority, and the spreading sense that the continent has become a front in a clash of civilizations. Read more at http://tinyurl.com/37lbfre
There is a taboo against noting their Islamic religion despite the fact that they themselves cite the religion as a key justification. Imagine reporting a crime but omitting the self-professed motivation?
Of course, the left see the "root cause" as our foreign policy and hateful culture. We're too blame; we brought it on ourselves, say the leftists. Since (according to the left) we are the problem, it is considered bigoted to look at any attribute of the enemy.
The media is now complicit in attacking America. They are intellectually siding with the enemy and giving them the intellectual weapons.
Yes, the mainstream media (including the so-called "right wing" ones like Fox news) are all in bed with the religion of Islam. That is plainly obvious.
The big question is "why"?
The clear message of the Quran and Sunnah clearly undermine just about every principle of fundamental justice and morality that has made America a great and free country. Is it some pathological neurosis? Is it mass hysteria ala Hitler's Third Reich? What is the logical explanation for the mainstream media's inability to be objective and truthful on this critical issue?
Any ideas?
So the next question should be what are you going to do about the MSM?
Yes, God forbid we upset the apple cart and point out the pathologies of the Islamic culture. I am all for finding common ground and giving the everyday Muslim the benefit of the doubt, but remembering to stand up for basic human rights shouldn't be too hard.
The trouble is that the MSM, which btw includes Fox News as well as the usual culprits, is so in the bag of powerful people, so obsessed with getting behind the velvet rope and tipping cocktails with generals, CEOs, and White House staffers that they've lost their sense of purpose. These media outlets, unlike most internet-based outlets, are the only ones with the resources to properly report what's going on in the world. The problem is, those resources come with strings attached.
So instead, our media are really glorified P.R. services for our ersatz aristocracy. Worse, they seem to be proud of it. Sadly, we'll continue to play "liberal vs. conservative bias," fools that we are.
The corruption of the lame stream media is the single biggest problem this country now faces. It's an ideological bias that infects every sphere of American life; from national security to personal liberty and everything in between. Whether it's driven by political correctness or by agenda makes no difference as to it's ultimate malignancy.
I would say to Robert! Kudos!! If , in this day of up is down and black is white, you are receiving complaints from the media about your treatment of (A)bsolutely (P)athetic reporters that assuredly means you are doing it right!!!
The Los Angeles Times is as corrupt as any of them. It has whole long articles about Islamic terrorist incidents where it omits any words like "Islam," "Islamic," "Jihad," or the like, or any clue as to motive. The reader has to figure it out for himself from the names of the perps, their countries, etc.
Good for you, Robert! I have always felt you were much too mild in your dealings with the press. These people are nothing short of traitors. That's how they should be treated.
Hi Mr Spencer, and thank you again for your seminar!
I attended (Mr Ekeroth's friend that asked about the "rape as warfare reference anywhere in the quran?" question after the seminar), hope your read the comments here. I also hope you could read my manuscript which has a lot of facts and examples regarding the Swedish media (of course one chapter about Aftonbladet that slandered you) between 2000 up to 2006. Maybe you and the FP writers/readers could find the information/analysis i gathered helpful in trying to understand what really has happened in Sweden
About the Swedish media one could start reading from here…. http://swedenandthejews.blogspot.com/2006/04/terr…
Again, thank you for standing up against the not so impartial Swedish journalist =)
Grateful thanks to Jihad Watch for its many highly informative posts.