Is President Obama evil or “just” wrong? A Rasputin or a Chamberlain?
Here’s a letter I recently received:
“Tuesday morning I happened upon your show. You were so good and I had never heard you before. But alas, you began to extol Obama’s recognition that there are certain things he knows he should have done differently. It was a nice hour or so while it lasted.
“Obama deserves no credit for anything. The man is a liar, a manipulator, a narcissist, a psychopath, a control freak, a Marxist, has no depth of knowledge about anything, etc., etc. But there you were, giving him the benefit of the doubt. ‘Aw, shucks, he’s not so bad after all.’ He spewed this garbage right before the election and yet you believed him?! Obama has to have a change of heart, not a change of mind.”
Point of clarification: I said and wrote that he would be the most radical, left-wing president in the history of this country — and that the guilt-ridden post-racialists who put him there would rue the day. Unfortunately, Obama has lived down to my expectations.
But calling the President a Hitler without the mustache is an unserious position and one that does nothing to dissuade Obama supporters, many of whom now suffer nearly terminal buyer’s remorse. It’s as obtuse as saying “Bush Lied, People Died,” or that George W. Bush ran for president so he could fabricate the intel to unjustifiably take the country to war to avenge his father and enrich his military contractor friends. And Obama doesn’t act alone. Every Democratic senator voted for the “stimulus” and for ObamaCare. Obama’s leftism is mainstream to his party. If Obama is evil, what does this make those who support his agenda?
It’s more than enough to say that Obama is an inexperienced, naive, wrongheaded ideologue who, even now, doesn’t recognize the harm he is doing to the country.
But with crucial elections looming, Obama has already retreated on his promise to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” and now says it’s Congress’ responsibility to change the law. Meanwhile, his Justice Department defends DADT in court.
He hasn’t even raised the issue of another bank bailout or a government-forced cessation of foreclosures — despite the banks’ recent admissions of negligence in processing home foreclosures. The Obama of two years ago would have used this as a pretext to intrude, if not take over the banks. What happened to his outgoing chief of staff’s admonition to “never allow a crisis to go to waste”?
Obama no longer uses the word “stimulus.”
He has exempted a number of businesses and organizations from some ObamaCare regulations.
He no longer talks about cap and trade or union card check.
When was the last time we heard about shutting down Gitmo?
When was the last time we heard about a New York trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?
Pages: 1 2