But if Iran gets its ideas from the Center for American Progress, where does the Center gets its ideas from? Curiously enough the answer may be Iran.
Iran’s PressTV is an arm of IRIB, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, which had attributed all tensions between Muslims and Westerners to a Zionist conspiracy. During the Rushdie affair, the Iranian official statement breaking diplomatic ties with the UK blamed the publication of the book on the “Agents of International Zionism.”
The Center for American Progress report follows the same line, blaming the negative view that Americans have of Islam on a handful of Jews, and the Iranian coverage of the report has highlighted the Jewish aspect of it, even beyond the already troubling notes in the CAP report.
This idea is so appealing because it allows Muslims to shift the blame for the anger caused by their own actions to a convenient scapegoat– the Jews. And for those who accept the CAP and IRIB view that the negative view of Islam is caused by a handful of Jews, then it naturally follows from there that getting rid of those Jews will improve relations with America.
That is how the Center for American Progress list so very easily becomes a hit list. Its seductive reasoning selects a group of people for Muslims to blame, and if some of the readers of the report or the Iranian coverage of it decide that “something needs to be done about this”, then there will be plausible deniability on the part of the little Bin Ladens.
The CAP report began by blaming Breivik’s actions on the “Islamophobes”, but if they really believe that then what do its authors think they are doing by supplying bigoted propaganda to a regime whose scapegoating and calls for genocide have become too loud for even most on the left to ignore?
Ahmadinejad could hardly ask for better propaganda than a report from a major American think-tank that supports what he and the Mullahs have been claiming all along– that all their problems with the West are caused by a Jewish conspiracy.
Breivik was only one man, but Iran sits at a global nexus of terrorist organizations whose reach stretches from Asia to South America and across the Middle East. Its nuclear weapons program means that it will soon have the ability to kill millions at the push of a button. What then do the “little Bin Ladens” think they are doing?
There are two possible answers. One, they don’t actually believe anything they said about what motivated Breivik. Two, they do believe it and the little Bin Ladens are making sure that the billion Breiviks of Islam pick the right target.
Pages: 1 2
Do not blame the messenger. First, unsuccessfully you wanted to defame a very prestigious think thank link as being antisemitic and failed miserably. Now, inventing a flimsy Iranian connection is just that a very suspicious effort to clear your name. You'd earn more respect though if you be a man and admit that you are an Islamophobic hate monger.
There is nothing phobic about opposing a " religion" whose dogma and history are: convert, submit or die.
Try again. First, think slowly. Don't fall asleep! Yes, what was that agin?
that means you need to quit lying about being an islamist. maybe sleeping would help with clearing you mind better
It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you.
You'd earn more respect if you admitted the Armenian genocide.
Not to mention the illegal invasion and occupation of Cyprus.
You forgot the Kurds
.
Ah the Kurds will mean a Two State Solution for Turkey.
But considering the Kurdish birth rate, the Turks would be wise to do it now or in a hundred years Istanbul will be the capital of Kurdistan.
from what we've seen of Turks the last few years, a change to Kurdistan would be an improvement.
Even before this too.
No can do. You claim, you prove. As usual, throw that sh*it on the wall and hope it stays. Think progress brings irrefutable evidence that you are a clueless, unadulterated fear monger. Can you prove that you are not? I don't think so.
I don't think you understand what the "irrefutable" means.Or argumentum ad ignorantiam.
I understand perfectly. It means you make unsubstantiated claims about a very credible source. They use independent and untainted evidence that you and your boss are hateful bigots. And you can not refute that. That is damning.
Just about all of what the CAP in regards to the discussed document has been or can be refuted, so, your next to last sentence is false. The claims made about Islam have been substantiated by the Koran and Hadiths. The only thing damning around here is your ignorance. So, please take your taqqiya and stuff it.
CAP good, frontpage garbage.
Have you read "Animal Farm"?
there's a similar chant in there "Four legs good, two legs bad."
Don't make him think for himself, it's too tiring.
and you have four?
There is overwhelming ,irrefutable evidence of every reported act of terrorism ,historical revisionism and the racist,bigoted,supremacist beliefs in Islam .From the quran to 270,000,000 murders.From raging antisemitism to calls for the extermination of all Jews.
A think tank has no comparison to dead bodies.No factual evidence or defensive excuses for their garbled "interpretations ."
Reporting on slaughters,human rights violations,hate speech and written smears of political /religious violations of others beliefs is not hate mongering nor Islamaphobia.Prove one news article is fake.Prove muslim antisemitism is not hate mongering.Prove anti-American speeches did not instigate 9/11.Prove muslims did not commit genocides,ethnic cleansing and brutal murders.Prove Muhammad did not rape a child.
Breivik was exactly what muslims claim all their terrorist are;nuts,misunderstanders,confused,mentally ill and aberrant . Contrary to muslim egomaniacal claims,Breivik's violent basis was political not religious and not Islamic .
Reporting facts is not hate mongering,the quan and Islam are hate mongerers -proven by muslims own words,actions and historical records.
It's easier to shout Islamophobia than to accept that real reform is needed.
and it is even easier to shout antisemitism than accepting that you are not chosen. recognizing that your s*hit stinks would be a welcome step towards a real reform.
Ah I forgot, the true chosen folk were the mass murderers of a pedophile with delusions of grandeur.
the same difference
Mohammed also did little boys in fact a muslims can do little boys up to the age of 13 years old without being called a homosexual now it you want to follow islam just understand one fact your son can be used same as a little girl._Islam means rape and blood and evil and any who follow that idea need help and a rope and a tree. I have been told at work my days are number
Why are you sad that you are 14? You sound more like 13.
wow, turkp, you're a disgrace to all Turks, except the sort of dimwit who ambushes unarmed soldiers who are merely following the law.
why tukp..you looking for a child to diddle like you pos prophet..if it makes you feel better i heard your prophet mohammed loved to take it from camels. the pig is the only animal to refuse to have sex with him, thats why mussies hate pork. hey how do you tell a mussie is lying…his lips are moving. now go enjoy yer bacha bazi partie..i bet you look so cute with yer lil bells spinning around. ISRAEL RULES! sand monkey arabs are spineless inferior fools!
If and when they come for you just make sure you take as many of them out as possible… At least we have the 2nd. amendment and right of self defense. use it.
“Psychological operations” a.k.a. PSYOPS. The strongest form of this type of warfare is the truth. The truth to evil is like throwing holy water laced with garlic on a vampire. Voice the truth and show evidence of it, transmit it to a critical crowd of this growing, menacing monster they’ll have too much to worry about with themselves than focusing their attention on us. The scriptures pertaining to Muhammad’s pedophilia is evident in the Qu’ran. A prominent speeker in Austria was arrested for publicly voicing this. The Islamic community were offended even though the very words proving what she was saying, came from the Qu’ran. Go figure.
So, in a way, muslims have offended themselves…
Gee, I think "something needs to be done about this"
It is.
Look at all the Muslim on Muslim violence.
I only need to look in the comments section of this article
"Argumentum ad ignorantiam"… that goes in my vocabulary!
It comes in handy next time you get told to prove their assertion false or accept that it's true.
you're right, Daniel, by far most of the dead caused by Islamists are other Moslems. That's why Islam doesn't clean up its own act; all Moslems KNOW that if they speak out against their co-religionists they'll be in big trouble.
Why else would they speak out against our efforts to take out THEIR garbage?
They spend more time fighting each over who the true Muslim to bother.
So you don’t stand by your publications? Or is it just that you don’t believe your name should be spoken nor graven images made in your likeness? Get a grip. If you write politically provocative, hateful, pro-Zionist garbage, people are going to say your name. And it’s true. You are a teeny weeny minority of people trying to wrap your little country in the mailed fist of the United States. Did anybody add names to your group that don’t belong there? No.
My dear non-colleague, you don't realize that people like you exist only to serve all my needs because I walk on water, and when I step on the shore, the ground becomes hallowed from the holy oils from my feet, and when I die I will be buried with ny buttocks in the air so you and all the followers of Islam can kiss my A$$ goodbye as I acsend into paradize to gather my 72 virgins.
Hey go easy on those beans lest you fly over that dead sea. When are you coming back?
You sure do get worked up a lot. Lots of stress at home? Don't tell me you have a Jewish boss.
All this anger you're feeling could be more productively released with a stress ball. Try one. I bet it'll do you a world of good.
The main point there is that I don’t freak out and write a column about it every time somebody attributes my own statements to me.
Maybe you should.
So is all support for Israel "hateful" and "garbage?" Or just the support expressed on this web site? From your standpoint, it would appear to be the latter.
No, not all support. Der Judenstaat was a very cogently written book full of realistically applicable idealism. I feel like what I am doing is the equivalent of supporting Northern Irish independence but opposing the IRA or Whitey Bulger. Mostly, I am expressing my disgust at what I see as expansionism coupled with bad faith use of the American press to guilt Americans into supporting totalitarianism as a bulwark against the insignificant religion of Islam.
Islam is indeed an insignificant religion; its inventor, Mohammed, saw that the only way to get anyone to follow his fairy tales was to brutally eliminate anyone who didn't. He started with the Arabs, stealing their "moon god" Allah and making it HIS creation by killing all who questioned his insanity. So, in fact,
Islam came to being due to Arab incest and inbreeding.
I'm not sure if there's one true word in that entire rant, and I'm not going to dig too hard to find out.
"the insignificant religion of Islam"
That insignificant religion of over a billion people that is set to demographically dominate Europe.
Yes, yes. We just got finished listening to Jews whining about how terrible France is, and how we shouldn’t say French Fries anymore, and how Muslims with hijabs provoked the state into banning scarfs, crosses AND yarmulkes in school. Then there was the Paris Subway Attack Hoax, then supposedly Germany and Holland fell to Islam, then England and Germany, and now the United States. Well, America is still good enough for 5,800,000 Jewish people to live here and only about 25 dedicated loudmouths to complain that Muslims are making the sky fall here too.
You can listen to the French say it, if you pack a dictionary.
Well, that's my point exactly, Daniel. You are making the United States too tense. And you mistakenly think you are in charge of deflating the hateful moment that you created. I noticed, even on your blog, you code switch between derisive humor until it fans into outright hatred, and then you cut it off when it gets too hot. My question is, is it really humor? Is is humor to keep a blog / diary where you write racist things and then crack a joke, usually an insult, when it gets too hot? It's a defense mechanism, but it's not very enlightening, not in the way that comedy is. I mean, how can you really keep it light while hating human beings? If it's bitter humor, then why isn't it even Lenny Bruce funny? If it's anger, then why is it banal anger punctuated with corniness?
I'm making the United States too tense? You give me way too much credit and not nearly enough to Mohammed Atta.
The hateful moment was created by Muslim terrorists and those who support them. They are in charge of deflating it.
Is it humor to laugh at people who try to kill you, then lie to your face about it? Maybe not Lenny Bruce humor, but Mel Brooks humor.
Mohammed Atta committed suicide a decade ago. He even used my local airport and I'm not half as tense about it as you are. I've been to the top floor of the WTC and I'm still not a quarter as tense about it as you are. You on the other hand are probably still tense about the Amalekites, the Baalim and Ramses II.
Instead you're four times as tense about a whole other group of people entirely.
Becauuuuuuse of their stupid racism and chicken little media, which has its own word: Israelization. Even Jews use the term, but what is more amusing than "Israelization" is the term "de-israelization," which is defined as apathy by American Jews toward Israel, a refusal to send money to Israel, and a refusal to make Aliyah to Israel. BOY does that sound like a Muslim bemoaning the fact that American Muslims don't make enough: Jihad, Zakat and Hajj.
http://www.jewishpost.com/archives/news/de-israel…
well include yourself as a loud mouth that believes that muslims are peaceful and just wan to get along. Yeah the Israeli Mossad caused the world trade towers to fall and it was an american missile that struck the pentagon.
I hate to break it to you man, but to the average person, Jews, Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians, and Egyptians look like the same person with different sized headgear. Iraqis and Philippinos look like Mexicans, and nobody cares if they are peaceful or warfaring, because we are Americans and and know they can't do anything to us. They can't wreck anything we can't rebuild, and people will always fly to Disneyland. Most people don't even remember the Pentagon got hit with anything except a few billion more dollars than last year. Anyone whoever heard of the Mossad know that they are best at killing 95 year old Nazis with a pillow, or posing as Palestinians, because they can't even tell themselves apart, and they exaggerate the importance of themselves and their enemies over there and over here.
All people who have two arms and two legs look basically the same to a tree frog. They look quite different to themselves.
Filipinos don't look like Mexicans or Iraqis except to someone way outside their group.
And the last time people who tried to dismiss the threat like you could be considered sane was September 10th. When one of the jolly folk funded by the Saudis, Iranians or Pakistanis get hold of something that can kill hundreds of thousands or millions, it will be about as sane as thinking that jumping off the roof can't kill you.
Sorry. I don't believe in Maoist Year Zeros.
you can go to your islamic buddies in the middle east and see how much crap you really would have to read. people like you are what make the world more unsafe when we have loons wanting to kill innocents and enablers like you helping them along. America love it or leave it. Preferably leave it for good in your case
Why should the world be safe? Are you some kind of pansy? What is there to do in a safe world other than get fat and watch television? Who are you telling to love or leave his own country?
"Why should the world be safe?" Never thought I would agree with a sick bastard like you. Because of people like you, we need endless wars, which is just politics at a higher level.
"Wajahat Ali’s hateful rhetoric often appeared at AltMuslim.com, a site created by Shahed Amanullah, who distributed a report to Muslims on Denise Spellberg’s book Jihad. His report was picked up by a Shiite site that dubbed it: “A new attempt to slander the Prophet of Islam."
Is this the same AltMuslim.com, which had this rather affectionate (http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/n/2799) interview with Jewel of Medina author Sherry Jones?
I'm confused?
That's kind of funny and opportunistic. After sending out a blast, he tries to defuse the backlash against the suppression with a softball interview.
There was a bit of a back and forth blame game there, with Spellberg crediting him and him saying that he never saw the book just went on her description. I guess after reading the book he decided it was actually pro-Islam, which Jones has always tried to pitch it as.
slander the prophet of islam. wow. i am trying to wrap my mind around that concept. how does one slander a deranged psychopath that raped the wife of an innocent man that he had murdered that very day? how does one slander a mass murderer and genocidal maniac? how to slander a robber and molester of a small child? can someone help explain how to slander such a monster? no surprise he had to invent his own religion, a religion in which evil is virtue. in any other religion the prophet is an arch-sinner.
"how does one slander a deranged psychopath"
by speaking the truth about him
I don't know… he says in his response that "Because censoring the book – even self-censoring – was something that I abhorred, I wrote a response here supporting free speech in this case, which has incidentally been republished in Lebanon, Egypt, Bangladesh, Morocco, and the United Arab Emirates. Yet, the entrenched notion that Muslims are antithetical to free speech continues."
Actually, this sounds entirely reasonable to me. I think you picked the wrong example to show Muslim intolerance here when we know there are plenty of others.
His initial response was the one that set the fire, the rest is ass coverage.
What exactly was that response? I can't find it
The initial message discussed in the article. I haven't found it, but it's been mentioned in numerous publications.
"“declaration of war” and warning them that publishing it would expose its employees to terrorist attack" They have already declared war. They are alredy fighiting a war. Spellberg is threatning war if we begin to defend ourselves in any way. These are the most evil people on the planet and random house is acquiesceng to their threats. We are already rolling over and wetting on ourselves. What does random house think, thay will kill them last?..Fools
Here we have a "religion" that from the day it was created by an inbred murdering pedophile has been killing anyone who disagrees. It long ago declared war on the West. The country that had put it "in a bottle", Britain, is in a shambles due to the efforts of West-hating Academics. These same academics are siding with Islamists time and time again. Now we have a Moselm in the White House, and the very fact that he's a Moslem is not only questioned but used as a club to attack those who state the fact.
What a tangled web we've allowed academic bureaucrats and politicians to weave.
Amazing that the UN Arab flacks, the MSM Islamo flackers, the ME radicals can smear Israel, America, every Judeo-Western Civ. worldview and contribution. Yet, if I believe, and I do, that every Islamofascist should disappear and the world would be a better place even for so called peaceful democratic Muslims. And btw, I want to see more of them!!! I hear about them yet few speak out against every evil of sharia, jihadism of the Islamofascists. Or perhaps we can tell the old joke. Muslims ask for a wall around the ME so nobody can interfere. It is a wish from a genie. The next wish comes from me. Fill it up with water.
But the problem is they want to put a wall around us.
Little Bin Ladens in America, would someone put out a list of their names
and addresses please, it would be amusing………………………William
I agree. Someone should post the little bin ladin's names, addresses, email addy, and phone numbers so everyone could let them know how much we appreciate them.
If the war comes to our streets treat the little bin ladins same as you treat the toerorists.
Islam is nothing more that mass genocide on an epic scale. 1400 years of genocide have resulted in as many as 600 million deaths all because these people refused to accept the rantings of a pedophile murdering dog as being the words of a moon-god's butt-wipe. To resist Islam or to point out the copious muder, rape misogynistic. woman-hating, pedophia-loving, untermench, passages in the Koran and the Sunna isn't being truthful to the delluded. No. its Islamophobic. Like bloody Hell it is. We know who the real Talibs are. And they aren't named Pipes, or Spencer. They got names like Hooper, Nazrallah, Zawahiri, Soros and Omar.
Marx truly plotted the downfall of the civilization.
This is incredible. A post that laid out clearly the connection between the pro-Islamist think tank and pro-Jihadist regimes in the Mideast has replies that:
- defame Jews – why? Well, for being Jews, and daring to live.
- smears all Americans who disagree with the Jihadist agenda as "h8rs" – how juvenile can you get?
- uses that bigotry canard – hey, it's not bigotry to try to avoid having ones culture destroyed and brains splattered around the scenery in the next attack. If you don't like what we say about your primitive culture, try evolving.
- deny reality, and the evidence of YOUR OWN BOOK!
I used to be recommended this website through my cousin. I am not sure whether this publish is written by him as no one else recognise such specific approximately my difficulty. You are wonderful! Thank you!