My favorite sign at Tea Party gatherings reads something like “It Doesn’t Matter What This Sign Says, You’ll Still Say It’s Racist.” Well, it doesn’t matter what Jared Loughner’s motives were, the Democrats will still blame it on a “climate of hate” supposedly created by the Right.
Of course, this effort to pin “racist” motives on the Tea Party and to blame the massacre in Tucson on Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and the millions of concerned Americans who comprise the Tea Party movement is itself nothing more than an attempt by radical leftists to ignite hatred for those who have the audacity to challenge their utopian agenda. Given that these attacks began before a shred of evidence existed about Loughner’s true motives, these attacks are by definition bigotry and prove yet again that the purpose of Modern Liberals’ arguments have nothing whatsoever to do with the truth and everything to do with their blind hatred for those who challenge their policies.
In the wake of these vicious and hateful attacks, many have cited Rahm Emanuel’s famous quotation about “never letting a good crisis go to waste.” Here is a “good crisis” by Democrat standards and folks like Paul Krugman at The New York Times (of course) did not let even a second go to waste before launching his hate-filled attacks. Not even Krugman denied the bigotry behind his attacks, since a good working definition of bigotry is the ascribing of negative motives and deeds to a category of people without regard for the facts.
But a quote more important to understanding the utter shamelessness of the Democrats in using what they saw as a wonderful opportunity to silence dissent comes from arguably the most beloved and influential Modern Liberal (read: radical leftist) of all, Howard Zinn, who declared that “Objectivity is undesirable.” Zinn declared the facts to be “undesirable” because “if you have any kind of a social aim, if you think history should serve society in some way; should serve the progress of the human race; should serve justice in some way, then it requires that you make your selection on the basis of what you think will advance causes of humanity.”
Those who seek to inflame hatred for the Right don’t care one whit about the facts – they find the facts to be undesirable because they get in their way of their “social aim.” Thus, it doesn’t matter what the Tea Party attendee’s sign reads, the Democrats will still say it’s “racist” because their “social aim” requires them to fire up hatred for those who question their policies. Hatred is the goal of Modern Liberalism because hate will blind their followers to the objective fact that the “social aim” of the Modern Liberal – the dominant force in today’s Democrat Party and the ideology that rules academia and the news media, is infantile folly.
Pages: 1 2