We are fighters against Israeli apartheid. We support BDS (boycotts, divestment, and sanctions) against Israel. We are progressive, caring, socially advanced, egalitarian and freedom-loving Anti-Zionists. Here we present to you our Grand Marching Song. Set to John Philip Sousa music.
All together now:
We despise apartheid.
And that is why we demand that the only state in the Middle East that is NOT an apartheid regime be boycotted and destroyed!!
We believe in enlightened government and progress.
And that is why we support Arab fascism.
We believe in peace.
And that is why we support all military aggression against Israel.
We believe in democracy.
And that is why we believe that the only country in the Middle East that has elections, a free press, free courts, and freedom of speech must be destroyed.
We believe in freedom.
And that is why we support Iran, Syria, the Taliban and the Hamas.
We believe in the freedom of speech and of the press.
And that is why we support the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas.
We believe in self-determination and self-definition for all.
But not for Jews.
We oppose violence.
And that is why we support Palestinian terror.
We believe in human dignity.
And that is why we applaud when Arabs blow up Jewish women and children.
We believe in human rights.
And for this reason we support Arab atrocities.
We believe in fraternity and the brotherhood of nations.
Except when it involves Jews.
We favor equality.
But the kind to be found in Turkey, Syria and Saudi Arabia.
We favor minority rights.
But not for Jews, Kurds, Southern Sudanese, Bahais, Iranian Sunnis, Egyptian Copts, or any other politically incorrect groups.
We believe in freedom.
But do not mind that slavery still exists in Sudan, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere among Arab states.
Pages: 1 2
Akbar! Superb!!
The so called human right organizations doen't protect 21 century vales!
They support movements that fight against all the values they pretend to defend.
It is silent when Islamists are denying:
Women equality–human rights–religious freedom–democracy
However they are practicing:
hate teaching in schools and children garden–genocide preaching in Mosques and TV—indiscriminately targeting civilians—chasing Christians-slavery on Sudan and Golf states
And don’t blame:
1:Muslim brotherhood speech saying:
'Hitler didn’t finish the jog—The Muslims will finish the job"
2:Hamas charter:
The day of judgment will not come until Moslems fight killing the Jews.
The stones and trees will say O MOSLEM, THERE IS A JEW BEHIND ME, KILL HIM
3: "Hiding among civilians prevents armies with western values the ability to fight.We impose a new non conventional equation in wars"
Said by Hamas leader Khalid Mash'al on Al-Jazeera.
They should support the following values.
Israel values and practice are based on the independence declaration stating:
*will promote the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants;
*will be based on the precepts of liberty, justice and peace taught by the Hebrew Prophets;
*will uphold the full social and political equality of all its citizens, without distinction of race, creed or sex;
* will guarantee full freedom of conscience, worship, education and culture;
* will safeguard the sanctity and inviolability of the shrines and Holy Places of all religions
Despite non stop wars, terror attacks, boycodes and dehumanization Israel has to phase for more than 65 years –Israel still hopes that those values will be achieved one day
End the illegal Palestinian occupation of Israeli lands!
Thumbs up! Though I'd amend it to, "End the illegal Arab occupation of the indigenous territory of the one and only true Palestinian nation, the Jewish nation!" A little longer, but it returns the narrative to truthfulness.
I was about to say just that!
ANTI-ZIONISM = JUDEOPHOBIA = McDONALDS BURGERS
Of course the analogy of South African styled Apartheid applied to Israel is an imperfect one.And yes,it is useful to the Anti-Zionists in that it is extremely emotive and sh!t does sticks.But the analogy is useful too in ways most analogies can be.The trick is to realize its limitations and imperfections.I hope I have it (half)right.
Of course the analogy of South African styled Apartheid applied to Israel is an imperfect one.And yes,it is useful to the Anti-Zionists in that it is extremely emotive and sh!t does stick.But the analogy is useful and helpful too in ways most analogies can be.The trick is to realize its limitations and imperfections.I hope I have it right.
First and foremost,Apartheid served the Europeans by building a legal and moral wall separating the ruling whites from the indigenous African.It preserved and guaranteed the power of one (European) over the other (African).Through a flawed and immoral set of rules and arbitrary criteria,it allowed a minority to rule as if it were a majority.Effectively,it denied majority rule.While it lasted,it served the Europeans well,but at the expense of the African.We have yet to see if the dark legacy of Apartheid will prevail or if the human heart and spirit as portrayed by Mandela will overcome baser motives.
At first look,Israeli society,or Israel proper (even that is as clear as mud),looks for all intents and purposes like a miniature outpost of western liberal democracy.But once the focus is enlarged,and the wider and historical aspects are inspected,we begin to see the useful and valid comparisons to Apartheid.First and foremost,the intent of Zionism and Israeli policy is to ensure Jewish power and control over what was once Arab/Muslim majority (ruled) Palestine.While the Europeans used legal and moral barriers and walls to achieve minority over majority rule,the Jews used de facto ethnic cleansing (creating facts on the ground) and physical walls and boundaries to achieve this end.Dismiss the Palestinian diaspora,and every thing is nice and tidy in Israel,morally and nationally.It is only when you look where you are taught and told not to look,for fear of confronting the dirty,unacceptable and shameful reality Israeli imposed Palestinian suffering,that you will feel the uncomfortable truth that is the Israeli lie. muchiboy
You could have made a great ideologue in the days of the now demised Soviet Union – lots of noise and drama and little substance and sense.
You can't imagine much sense coming out of a snail-brained Jew-hating little Nazi drummer boy, can you?
"First and foremost,the intent of Zionism and Israeli policy is to ensure Jewish power and control over what was once Arab/Muslim majority (ruled) Palestine."
The indigenous people of any territory have the right to a nation-state in which they enjoy exclusive political rights. Abdicating this right leads to a multicultural free-for-all that usually ends disastrously (see: Lebanon, former Yugoslavia to name just two examples).
As the indigenous people of Palestine, the Jews have the right to an exclusivist nation-state on it. The Arab nation has a right to an exclusivist nation-state in the Arabian Peninsula; it has no right to any state outside the Arabian Peninsula, its indigenous territory, just as the Jews have no right to a nation-state in, say, Indochina.
"Dismiss the Palestinian diaspora,and every thing is nice and tidy in Israel,morally and nationally."
Dismiss the illegal Arab settlement of indigenous Palestinian (=Jewish) lands, and everything is dark and bleak and evil about Israel. It is only when you see beyond the lie and come to the truth that you realize anti-Zionism is a movement founded upon injustice, an illegitimate movement every bit as execrable as Nazi Germany's disguising of their designs on Czechoslovakia under the mantle of "helping the oppressed Sudeten-Germans." The Arab settlers in Palestine are the Sudeten-Germans of the Middle East, as the author of this very article has remarked numerous times.
This is standard muchiboy rhetoric and rambling on about apartheid, which shows just how ignorant he is about Israel, S. Africa and the entire concept of apartheid.
First of all, the use of the term "apartheid" is an insult to the blacks in South Africa. Apartheid was their special and unique tragedy. By using the term to describe an altogether different situation, you trivialize and degrade their suffering and the uniqueness of their particular experience. You should be ashamed.
Second, apartheid was an official policy in South Africa, enacted in law and enforced through police violence, of brutal political, legal and economic discrimination against people of color. It was based upon minority control over a majority population. Israel has nothing remotely comparable. It is a multiethnic, multicultural majority-rule democracy like the US or Canada.
Israel is a multiethnic, multiracial state with freedom of religion and civil rights for all its citizens. Israelis come from over 100 countries in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Israel has 15 sanctioned religions and 20% of Israelis are not Jews. They have equal rights and protections as in any democracy.
While Jews are a majority in Israel, the Arab minority has all the same civil and legal rights as its Jewish majority. Israeli Arabs have five political parties. Arab-Israelis held 12 of the 120 seats in the Israeli Parliament in 2002. Arabic is an official language of Israel and is on equal footing with Hebrew.
Moreover, Israel never extended its laws to the Palestinians in Gaza and the W. Bank who are not Israeli citizens. When it began its administration of the Territories, Israeli left intact Jordanian and local law that had governed the Territories prior to the 1967 War.
Oddly enough, the Palestinians achieved more self-government and more self-rule than they had ever enjoyed in the 19 years of Jordanian rule. Israeli administration dramatically improved Palestinian self-rule. There was nothing that remotely resembled apartheid law.
Hamas (unfortunately) controls the entire Gaza Strip, and the Palestinian Authority governs 98% of the W. Bank (not including the settlements). Recall, the Palestinian Authority has its own legislature, administrative, educational and legal system. There is nothing that remotely resembles apartheid law! Of course, if there is apartheid in Gaza and the W. Bank, then it was instituted by the Hamas and Palestinian leadership, NOT Israel.
Game, set, match muchiboy.
muchiboy is a moron
If anything the Jews in Israel are analogous to the indigenous black natives of south africa, while the Arabs are the discriminatory racists attempting to suppress the rights of and disenfranchise the majority group!!
The Muslim claim to the al-Asqa mosque is false as well. (sorry, muchiboy)
Apropos of the al-Aqsa mosque… and Jerusalem in Islamic eyes in general. There have been only two periods when Jerusalem was really treated as befits its holiness by the Muslims: In the period of the Crusades, and now. An old 19th-century photograph of this "most holy mosque" shows it in a state of utter neglect, even so far as tiles missing from it.
Islam is a miser: The so-called valuables can be forgotten for all the Muslims care, right until a non-Muslim gets his hands on them. Then it's war with no holds barred, and the "outraged sensibilities of Muslims everywhere" trumpeted from the rooftops.
"The indigenous people of any territory have the right to a nation-state in which they enjoy exclusive political rights."
Ziontruth,you know that is untrue,at least today and in Israel/Palestine,given today's world view.No one today,even your friends would accept that argument,given the history of the Palestinian Arabs.You are indeed fortunate that the western world thought Jews should have their own national homeland,and given the Holocaust,one could almost forgive them for their motives,even if they didn't have the foresight and wisdom to know better.You have to wonder if the Jews didn't jump from the fire into the frying pan.
" Abdicating this right leads to a multicultural free-for-all that usually ends disastrously (see: Lebanon, former Yugoslavia to name just two examples)"
Yes,there are risks,and I can understand why Jews aren't risk takers.But you live in a very unfriendly neighborhood,and if that neighborhood achieves a degree of social ,political and economic stability and cohesion,with or without democratic pretensions,the balance of power,political and military,may be up for grabs.Israel cannot count on anything,and even small fish in small ponds cannot go it alone anymore.
"As the indigenous people of Palestine, the Jews have the right to an exclusivist nation-state on it."
With 20% of your population Palestinian,and more counting the West Bank where you have 500,000 settlers living,you hardly have an exclusive indigenous Jewish nation-state.Just look at the numbers.My God,man,you might have the entire piece of cake,you already have the Palestinians,like it or not.
" The Arab nation has a right to an exclusivist nation-state in the Arabian Peninsula; it has no right to any state outside the Arabian Peninsula,"
There is not a western country or leader worth their salt who would even debate this point,much less agree to it.If anything,the world is becoming more global.Your world view,and Israel too,is in danger of becoming an anachronism.muchiboy
You exemplify the ignoramus, anti Semite, stupid and dangerous out there!
"The World is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
~ Albert Einstein
"You are indeed fortunate that the western world thought Jews should have their own national homeland,and given the Holocaust,one could almost forgive them for their motives,even if they didn't have the foresight and wisdom to know better."
The west did not "give" Israel (or anything) to the Jews. The Zionists of the 19th century legally purchased vacant land and literally built Israel from the ground up. Tel Aviv was founded on sand dunes in 1909, and today is a modern cosmopolitan city similar to Miami, Toronto, New York (albeit on a smaller scale). All of this despite the fact that Jews have had a continuous historical and legal connection to the land.
And recall, the entire International community became committed to restoring the Jewish homeland long before the Holocaust. The Balfour Declaration was issued in 1917 and the League of Nations Palestine Mandate was issued in 1920, well before the birth of the UN. You would know this if you actually read history about the conflict rather than relying on empty propaganda to fit into your own warped worldview.
"Israel cannot count on anything,and even small fish in small ponds cannot go it alone anymore."
Israel doesn't go it alone and tries to make peace with its Arab neighbors every chance it gets. Why else did Israel sign peace agreements with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994)? Why else is Israel committed to the creation of a Palestinian state despite Palestinian refusal for statehood?
"With 20% of your population Palestinian,and more counting the West Bank where you have 500,000 settlers living,you hardly have an exclusive indigenous Jewish nation-state.Just look at the numbers.My God,man,you might have the entire piece of cake,you already have the Palestinians,like it or not."
20% of the population is not Palestinian, they are the non-Jewish minority, who are mostly Arab-Israelis. The state of Israel exists on less than 1% of the Middle Eastern land when compared with the Arab/Islamic countries. Arab countries illegally occupy 85% of the National Jewish Homeland. So who really has the entire piece of the cake here?
By the way, the settlements make up less than 2% of the W. Bank land. Over 85% of the settlements are suburbs or municipalities bordering major Israeli cities, and are nowhere near or adjacent to Arab settlements, towns or villages.
"Your world view,and Israel too,is in danger of becoming an anachronism."
Hmmm… Israel exemplifies modern, progressive and Western liberal values. Israel is an international economic powerhouse. Israel has the "highest number of startups per capita of any nation in the world and massive venture capital investment, Israel is one of the world's entrepreneurship hubs."
The Palestinians and their Arab/Islamic counterparts are backwards, oppressive, xenophobic and decidedly illiberal – facts confirmed by the Arab Human Development report. Did you know that without oil, the Arab/Islamic states COMBINED would have a GDP less than that of Finland (a tiny country with roughly 5 million people)?
So who is really becoming the anachronism here?
"You are indeed fortunate that the western world thought Jews should have their own national homeland…"
You seem to think Jews are still the helpless people of the ghettos and mellahs of the Christian and Islamic worlds, respectively; incapable of getting anything for themselves, dependent on others' favors for their very existence. This is no longer so, even though it's obvious you'd like it to go back to being so.
"Yes,there are risks,and I can understand why Jews aren't risk takers."
If you really understood, you wouldn't call the Jews to take those risks. Your "understanding" is nothing but a platitude.
"With 20% of your population [Arab settlers],and more counting [Judea and Samaria] where you have 500,000 [Jews] living,you hardly have an exclusive indigenous Jewish nation-state."
Correct, at the moment. That's why, among other reasons, I'm an advocate of ethnic cleansing. Apartheid is unsustainable, while concessions only bring the enemy close to total victory. What, then, is left? Only that which the Torah calls for: Forced removal of the usurping population.
"If anything,the world is becoming more global."
You mean, coming more under Marxist/Islamist superstate thralldom. But this is no more "progress" than was the Nazi conquest of Europe and North Africa. This is evil and needs to be confronted, stopped and rolled back.
"Your world view,and Israel too,is in danger of becoming an anachronism."
Au contraire, my worldview is the wave of the future, unless you're OK with living under the jackboot of a Marxist or Islamic superstate. To call my worldview is an anachronism is to call civil liberties an anachronism. It is to call the right of a family to live safe and secure in their home an anachronism.
If the state is not its nation's castle then there is little point in its existing. Anachronism is your anti-national, imperialistic worldview, not mine.
What a pity that putrid Jew-haters who have Der Sturmer read to them like yourself aren't an anachronism.