Obama’s State of the Campaign Address


The president’s environmental bloc had to wade through some throw-away lines. For example, his boast that the country relies “less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years” has a lot to do with low demand caused by a beleaguered economy. And when he noted that “We don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy,” he failed to mention that when given the opportunity—in the form of the Keystone XL pipeline—he chose the environmental lobby rather than economic recovery.

When he finally got on message, he got on a roll. “Renewable energy use has nearly doubled,” he declared. “I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy,” he gushed. And putting our money where his mouth is, he unveiled plans to “allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.” He then announced his decision to dragoon the Department of Defense into the quixotic effort by directing it to “make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history,” thus turning America’s shrinking Armed Forces into the R&D arm of his green agenda.

With lines that sounded strangely anachronistic, he rallied another important bloc of his coalition, declaring that “Women should earn equal pay for equal work.” He then vowed that he would not allow America to “go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to…charge women differently from men.”

That brings us to the crescendo of his State of the Campaign Address: the obligatory class-warfare rhetoric.

In the span of about 40 minutes, the president took credit for the automaker bailout that saved “a million jobs”—but happened to be launched in the waning hours of the Bush presidency—and then lambasted the bank bailouts.

“No bailouts, no handouts and no copouts,” he said in ripping into banks, Wall Street and a financial system that “was allowed to play by its own set of rules.”

He spoke of giving banks “a chance to repay a deficit of trust,” tried to shame Congress into ending the “tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans” and decried “the corrosive influence of money in politics.”

In a speech full of eye-rollers, that last one may take the prize. After all, it was the Obama campaign that raised millions from undisclosed donors in 2008. As Newsweek reported at the time, tens of thousands of dollars poured into the Obama campaign from “individuals” with names like “Doodad Pro” of Nunda, New York, and “Good Will” of Austin, Texas. “Good Will,” Newsweek observed, “listed his employer as ‘Loving’ and his occupation as ‘You,’ while supplying as his address 1015 Norwood Park Boulevard, which is shared by the Austin nonprofit Goodwill Industries.” Moreover, it is the Obama campaign that’s now boasting about raising $1 billion dollars for 2012.

By this time next year, we’ll know if the president’s promises have held his coalition together.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • betwyan

    The GOP is not gonna beat this guy. It's basically over. When so many people are on some form of govt. subsidy and when the media acts as his cheerleader, it's a done deal. Barry Soetoro for 5 more years.

  • pierce

    God help us betwyan. If there were more of you we would not need an election, but fortunately there is a National Election in November. Let the people speak.
    I got a feeling they don't and won't agree with you. I certainly don't.

  • RiverFred

    Democrats have 44% of the votes without campaigning, perhaps more with 43 million on food stamps and who knows what else Obozo has handed out with your tax money.
    If Obozo wins grab your gold, sell your assets and move to another country.

    • wsk

      Where would you move to? Europe? It's time to stand and fight for our country. I will vote for ABO. A sack of rocks will be better than the man-child messiah.

    • Curious

      With at least one person seeking the Republian presidential nomination not being nominated by the GOP will result in a THIRD PARTY. This person or persons will take enough votes from the Republican Party to give Obama more than enough Electorial College Votes to be reelected in 2012 but with beween 40 the 44 percent of the popular vote. Liberal Democrats seeking election to the Senate and House will ride his coattails into a SUPER MAJORITY of the legislature thus he will have a rubber stamp congress. Where to move or what to do will be each individuals own decision but we are betting there will several states leave the new USSA (United Socialist State of America) and want to be called NEW AMERICA or something similar with its own consitution, president etc. The present anti-war president will not want to go to war to stop this believing this new country will fail and people will be crawing back on hands and knees to be under His rule.

  • Curious

    QUESTION? From an outsiders point of view, WHAT IS THE STATE OF THE UNION as described in Obamas address? Is this address ordered, authorized, mandated or what and by whom–the Consitution or the Congress? If it is required by the constitution and the present president did not tell Congress the State of the Union was the president in violation of any laws for which he could be impeached?

  • j blevins

    Anatomy of an Obama compromise: Obama wanted to require everybody to have free birth control/abortion insurance, he ordered every employer to provide it including the Churches, he said it was a "balanced" compromise, Churches balked pointing out that little ole thing called the Constitution which Obama thinks is obsolete, instead of admitting he was wrong (has he ever done that?) he decided what the next "compromise" would be and ordered insurance companies to provide the coverage free. he said the Churches could pretend they were off the hook. since nothing is free, everyone knows the cost will be built in the rates somewhere. Note that both of his so called compromises were what he decided on his own, not exactly the definition of compromise. there is also another little "constitution" problem with the president ordering a private business to give a "free" service, but, hey, Obama has decided that the constitution does not apply to him. what i don't understand is what does it take to get the left's attention. aren't there any Christian Democrats left????? you would think they would be outraged. i guess politics trumps God too.