Obama Adviser Wants Syrian ‘Resistance’ to Israel

Let's wait and see what happens when a victorious Western supported free Syrian administration demands the freedom of Syria's Golan from Israeli occupation. LOL. The spin will sure be breathtaking.

Just as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke for former President Bush — when she inferred Israel is a racist state by comparing the Palestinians to pre-civil rights Blacks in the American South — so Dalia Mogahed speaks for Obama. Truth be known Mogahed and Obama would like to see more 'resistance' to Israel from both Syria and Iran.

So I guess Condoleeza and Bush get a free ride Eh ? As for Mogahed ? She should be on the unemployment line ….YESTERDAY .

USA is the man moving the couch. Israel is the woman saying it looks better near the window, except that it blocks the light, and that no, no, it looks better near the door but it blocks the table. How many times and how many countries now have we heard them say that the current leader has to be deposed or assassinated, and then deal it back and complain that it would leave radical Muslims in charge of the country? At this point there is a media blockade in the US and we can't even properly and fairly elect our own leaders because hagglers and lobbyists are unsure about who should be dispensed into office in our own country. This can only be solved by reducing the amount of countries in which Israel has a lobby and limiting it to just Israel.

Dalia Mogahed –

"~ Obama has kept her, and continues to keep her as official spokesperson.
~Obama appointed her to serve on the White House Office of Faith-Based Partnerships."

Obama's BLACK DALIA.

In the Arab and Middle Eastern context resistance is, of course, a codeword for terrorism and war.

Excuse me….but it's a code word for jihad instead, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and in which constitutes total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means. Meanwhile, terrorism, on the other hand, is not only blasphemous and an un-Islamic capital offense in Islam, it can also be for any political cause other than in the cause of Allah. Also, unlike jihad, which is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means, terrorism, in stark contrast, as its name implies is always only violent.

Indeed, it is very important for the West to stop conflating jihad with being terrorism, because it enables the many covert and deceptive non-violent varieties of jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West, which is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, to occur totally below the radar and completely uncontested and unopposed.

In fact, Muslim jihadists can do far more damage to the West via duping useful idiot non-Muslim unbelievers than via blowing them up, which is why covert and deceptive non-violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently relative to violent jihad and constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West.

It wasn’t Mogahed’s first venture in radicalism.

The notion of Islamic radicalism is a misconception that stems from the false PC multicultural myth whereby Islam is a so-called Religion of Peace™ and the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are peaceful and moderate people. Thus, when Muslims act outside the context of that false PC multicultural myth, a new false PC multicultural myth is required to explain away the deviant behavior. Shazam a new false PC multicultural myth is created: the myth of radical or extremist Muslims and radical and extremist Islam.

However, the reality is per Islamic doctrine, all Muslims on earth are jihadists. A tiny minority of Muslims are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims are covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists, and the few that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam must be executed.

Two years ago she advocated Sharia law on British TV, saying it provided “gender justice” even though

What's so radical about a Muslim advocating Sharia law? Indeed, Sharia and Jihad are intrinsic to Islam. In fact, you can't import Muslims into your country without also importing Sharia and Jihad at the same time, as Sharia is the will of Allah and Jihad is the sixth and most important pillar of Islam. Indeed, Sharia and Jihad in Islam couldn't be anymore mainstream, and if Mogahed was anti-Sharia and anti-Jihad it would mean she is a blasphemous apostate, which per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam means she must be executed.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is just a mainstream orthodox Islamic group. However, unlike the vast overwhelming majority of covert and deceptive jihadists, it doesn't conceal its intentions.

This woman is so very evil in so many ways. She is treacherous, betraying at least 1/2 the world population (female) and all other religions. She is power mad and subservient to all men at the same time, and she is a consummate liar. Because i believe in a God of justice I pray that the harm she crafts for other women should fairly come to her first.

Every person Barac selectived to serve in his administration is an anti American the same as Barac. There was not one decent American chosen to fill a czars position and Barac had 36 czars. Should Barac be reelected a separating out of conservatives to republican states followed by a declaration of independence would be called for.
They, the liberals are the parasites. We could live very nicely without them.
One and done. Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thank you.

Ahhh bi-partisan apathy !

uh ….yea ……lets elect her president . Dont mistake stupidity for honesty . When it comes to muslim hatred of jews and Israel , muslims simply can not contain themselves ,Even to the detriment of their own strategies and agendas .
Any muslim holding ANY public office of any kind , sooner or later feels the neccessity to validate themselves on the issue of Israel …..and that is to oppose its very existence .If it is the policy of the United States that Israel has the right to exist , then it is highly inappropriate that any advisor to the president should take an opposing position to that policy -privately or publicly ,as this would taint any advise offered .Thias woman should be dismissed unceremoneously and immediately .

Few points
First one: with friendly Russian Forces on the ground in Syria, fighting for Assad, it would be interesting to see NATO bombing Assad in a way they did it to Gaddafy. Russia acts out of its best diplomacy – protecting Iran from Israel, Syria from NATO – all out of grown respect to USA, thanks to Obama-Hillary amateur diplomatic efforts.
Second one: Maturin20 comments reflect ordinary post-Soviet Russian Anti-Semitism, which show a clear difference between this site and a left wing one – my comments against Iranian Mullahs have been censored out in Haffington Post, but comrade Maturin is free to his/her opinion on the subject.
Third one: Jewish People are now in a year of 5772 and are not only People of the Book, but of computers, ships and fighter jets – just a reminder to anyone, who forgot it.

Great point.