Chief Islamic Judge of the Palestinian Authority, Who Said “Where Hitler Failed, We Must Succeed”, Wants to Run for President


That’s president of the Palestinian Authority, not the United States. Unfortunately that’s a point that has to be clarified these days.

Sheikh Tayseer Tamimi’s presidential plans are a bit debatable because

A. The Palestinian Authority doesn’t really do elections anymore

B. Palestinian Authority leaders come out of Fatah or the IMF. They don’t come from elections. If they did Hamas would be running the Palestinian Authority.

C. The Palestinian Authority isn’t allowing Sheikh Tamimi to run and they probably only let him get this far to warn Israel that there are worse creatures than Abbas or Fayyad out there.

But A through C could be irrelevant because the Middle East has gone Islamist and with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the AKP in Turkey dominating local politics, the time might be right for a takeover of the Palestinian Authority by the Chief Islamic Judge of the Palestinian Authority.

Sheikh Tayseer Tamimi has formed one of those Islamist sounding parties, The Party of Freedom and Independence, which sounds a whole lot like the Muslim Brotherhood’s party in Egypt. And he has what it takes to be popular among Palestinian Arab voters… he really hates Jews.

“The Jews are destined to be persecuted, humiliated, and tortured forever… , and it is a Muslim duty to see to it that they reap their due.  No petty arguments must be allowed to divide us.  Where Hitler failed, we must succeed.”

But Palestinian Arab voters concerned that Sheikh Tayseer Tamimi is a single-issue candidate can be reassured that Tamimi doesn’t just hate Jews. He also really hates America.

“Islam is escalating and cannot be resisted. I pray that Allah may tear apart America just as the Soviet Union was torn apart.”

That should give him something in common to talk about with Barack. Still Palestinian Arab voters need not be too worried that Sheikh Tamimi will be too distracted from his hatred of Jews, by his hatred of America. He’ll likely take on such major issues as Israel’s export of AIDS.

“Israel is trying to hurt the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian people also by means of exporting AIDS, drug trafficking, promiscuous norms, and making prostitution legal,” warned president of the sharia religious court in the PA, Sheikh Taissir Tamimi.

But speaking of AIDS, the Palestinian Authority’s Chief Islamic Judge has a certain tawdry history that may come up in an election.

Tamimi, 60, was at the center of a scandal that erupted in 2010, when a woman lodged a complaint against him for sexual harassment.

The scandal broke out after former Palestinian intelligence officer Fahmi Shabaneh said that Tamimi had exploited his position to sexually harass a woman who came to his office seeking work.

It’s amazing Sheikh Tamimi combines together the best qualities of Obama and Clinton. Now he’s almost qualified to run on the Democratic Party line for President.

Comments

  1. AdinaK says:

    Well, they signal Heil Hitler when they march and Arafat's uncle was the notorious Al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, who went to Germany to actively assist in the Holocaust, expecting to repeat one when he returned to Jerusalem!

    Nothing they say or do regarding their genocidal plans should shock, least of all to those who know their history. And it is not as if they don't crow about their so called 'identity' hoax – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/27/another-arab-

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel – http://www.adinakutnicki.com/about/

    • JacksonPearson says:

      IMO, no country should be recognized that use the Qur'an as a basis for their rule of law.

      • objectivefactsmatter says:

        "IMO, no country should be recognized that use the Qur'an as a basis for their rule of law."

        Exactly. Only the need for oil…ONLY FOR THIS REASON..did we foolishly let them enter the UN in the hopes that they would grow in to the honor. Instead, the UN was lowered to their standards and that is what we have today: The United Nations Beholden to the Followers of the Koran.

    • objectivefactsmatter says:

      "Arafat's uncle…"

      Not just uncle, he also raised the psychopath too.

  2. Hell's Gatekeeper says:

    Israel: you have nuclear weapons. We all know that. Use them! Use them now, before it is too late.

    Don’t let the camel return to Hister.

  3. κατεργάζομαι says:

    So Vat's nu? It reminds me of the gravemarker epitaph: I TOLD YOU I WAS ILL!

    Very often one hears the revisionists and propagandists finding ancient historical links between the "Philistines" ("Invaders" in Hebrew) and the Arab "Palestinians." There is no truth to this claim!
    The Arabs of "Palestine" are just that… Arabs! And these Arabs of "Palestine" have about as much historical roots to the ancient Philistines as did Yasser Arafat to the Eskimos!

    Even the word "Palestine" has no meaning in Arabic – every word in Arabic has some meaning deriving from the Koran, but the word "Palestine" does not. If anything, the name "Palestine" was associated with Jews. In the years leading up to the rebirth of Israel in 1948, those who spoke of "Palestinians" were nearly always referring to the region's Jewish residents.

    God GAVE the Land of Israel to the Jewish People. And God does nothing by accident! amen.

    Hitler and the Islamic Assa-hole-hahs' eternity shall be over a lump of burning sulphuric coal.

    • Mary Sue says:

      Yeah, mainly because "Palestinia" is a Roman word! Which the Arabs tried to co-opt!

      Their insolence knows no bounds.

      • κατεργάζομαι says:

        One of the most dangerous outcomes of this Arab propaganda campaign, is that it has convinced well-meaning people around the world (including some Israeli and American Jews) – that being pro-'Palestinian' means that you are for a peaceful solution that will give a people called "Palestinians" (who are not really culturally or historically separate from any other Arab group) their own country called 'Palestine' next to Israel, where they can live in peace.

        This entire belief is a deliberately conceived lie, – - that, from its inception in 1964, – - – was always intended to be used to destroy Israel.

        We cannot count on a person or government to be our friend if he also considers our enemy his friend.

    • objectivefactsmatter says:

      LOL!

      I can laugh when I hear I'm not the only one disgusted by how far they get with this. Muslims are invited all the time to Christian churches and groups and all that BS, and these liars are out talking about how "at least half of the apostles of Jesus were Palestinian." I actually read that tidbit in an article published by a "Fake-a-stinian" Dr. of Fake History. First they invent Islamic history, and then they keep creating more detailed lies as needed for jihad. Jihad is warfare of all kinds, and lying constantly any time it suits the liar.

      The question is, why would any Christian or Jew go around with their mouths shut about this fundamental issue of lying…LYING constantly as soon as they think we won't correct them? And most of the time they're correct about that, "we" won't correct them. Don't blame me for that last part.

      • κατεργάζομαι says:

        I'm not in the "ecumenical" crowd and have railed against it for decades.

        Whenever we, as biblical Christians, think that things couldn’t possibly become more preposterous in Christendom, we need to call to mind the Scriptures that tell us that the time will come when Christians will not endure sound doctrine, and many will corrupt the Word of God.

        Chrislam? Christian Palestinianism?? http://www.thebereancall.org/content/chrislam-chr

        ~ 2 Timothy:4:3 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears…"

        It seems that the apostasy (the undermining of biblical faith to prepare the way for the religion of the Antichrist) is developing at an exponential rate, and contributions are being made through a diversity of unbiblical agendas.

        Today, such teachings and practices are increasing at a staggering rate—This is completely in line with the End Times prophecy of a One World Religion.

  4. JacksonPearson says:

    Well Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil Sheikh. Nothing like a little Jew-phobia coming out of a PLO Nazi.

  5. Rebas Thgil says:

    “Where Hitler Failed, We Must Succeed” – is the implied meaning of the proposed so-called "palestinian" constitution, which is why they must never be recognized as a country of their own. They simply don't deserve it and never will as long as their sole reason for existence is the destruction of Israel.

    • Mary Sue says:

      Gotta find a crap ton of leftists that aren't actually anti-semites and show them this blatant nazi glorification.

      • CatK says:

        MS, you can't find such people. They are either open with their hatred(&self-hatred) or have head in sand Stockholm syndrome. Either way, they love to hate the same tiny minority as was hated 70 years ago.
        Have you read "United in Hate" by Jamie Glazov? No, I cannot sympathize with the mental illness known as leftism. No.

        • objectivefactsmatter says:

          "MS, you can't find such people. They are either open with their hatred(&self-hatred) or have head in sand Stockholm syndrome. Either way, they love to hate the same tiny minority as was hated 70 years ago."

          This is correct. They hate them because they are programmed to, because the Jews wrote the Bible, stayed loyal to it, and remind everyone about the possibility that it just might not be so easy to ignore without consequences. Most people are unaware of their irrational hate.

  6. Rebas Thgil says:

    Sheikh Tayseer Tamimi: to blazes with you and your corrupt foreign government posing as a religion, and its bigoted murderous pedophile prophet, (pees be upon him). You clowns don't have a religion of peace – you have a cult of death and destruction.

  7. Rebas Thgil says:

    "It’s amazing Sheikh Tamimi combines together the best qualities of Obama and Clinton. Now he’s almost qualified to run on the Democratic Party line for President."

    One of the best lines I've seen this week!

  8. What he does is bad enough by itself. The gratuitous shots at Obama and Clinton are really not necessary and detract for people who would be more open in the absence of the conflation. Do you really believe the red meat approach is more effective than just to expose this lovely Palestinian fellow for what he is?

    • objectivefactsmatter says:

      "The gratuitous shots at Obama and Clinton are really not necessary and detract for people who would be more open in the absence of the conflation."

      It's a judgment call. He's not an AP reporter and this isn't a wire service. That doesn't make your opinion wrong, but there are other considerations than to always worry about avoiding upset in the closed-minded.

      Very often I use the subtle tactics, but here I feel most of the time I sense the need to confront the arrogant people in to replying, so they can see how empty their positions really are. If you are too respectful, they go away without really learning anything. Forcing them to defend themselves forces them to see or at least examine how little defense they have for those often
      "fact-free" positions.

      The articles stoke the fires and then the discussion can take it in any direction each person sees most productive in their respective views.

      • Who said this was a wire service? That is NOT at all what I said, not even in the ballpark. Nor was I speaking about tactics.

        This was about the Jew hater in Palestine, not Obama. Uniformed people get diverted by the needless bashing, If this is to persuade more than true believers, I think it will be unsuccessful, and that is troubling. The author does not like Obama. It's not like that is a revelation!

        What I offered was feedback to the author and he will decide if there is merit in consideration of the purpose in mind.

        Many of the uniformed don't care because the level of discourse is no different in tone than on the liberal blogs, with a good dose of demonization from each.

        • objectivefactsmatter says:

          "This was about the Jew hater in Palestine, not Obama. Uniformed people get diverted by the needless bashing, "

          I guess you could be right. I totally understand your sensitivity and your point, but I think it's a judgment call. Writing effectively is not as easy as critiquing. They do very well here with the topics an cranking out current commentary without boring us to death.

          • Yep, but the constant demonizing that goes on here and elsewhere, in stories and comments, may keep people from being bored, yet is destructive and should stop.

          • objectivefactsmatter says:

            "Yep, but the constant demonizing that goes on here and elsewhere, in stories and comments, may keep people from being bored, yet is destructive and should stop."

            Moral outrage has a time and place. We need to be selective. not silent about it.

            And this:

            "It’s amazing Sheikh Tamimi combines together the best qualities of Obama and Clinton. Now he’s almost qualified to run on the Democratic Party line for President."

            Hardly qualifies as demonizing, if that is what you're referring to. The truth is that rhetoric aside, all 3 men have the same objectives. They all expect Israel to roll over for terrorists and treat them like serious, accountable statesmen. And furthermore, if ever the term applied to anyone, who's to say who really is the demon? These men represent bottom of the barrel in terms of leadership that brings on tyranny.

            If demons exist, I think I know where to find them.

    • Rebas Thgil says:

      1. -what ofm said.
      2. Similar to Rush, I believe that the myth of the 'registered independent' is just that. Most of these folks are just too yellow to admit that they lean lefty at every opportunity and use the indignation at the humor as a means to back out of any logical weighing of the evidences. Truly open minded folks that I have met can roll with the humor raining down against their initial perception and many can fire back great retorts pretty quickly, then get down to true debate. Sort out the chaff up front, I say; the pansies are just too pitiful to waste too much time on.

      • Don't really get your response. I did not say anything about independent voter, but believe I addressed the very type of open minded you defined. I think this turns them off, especially if it contains gratuitous shots.

        • Rebas Thgil says:

          There was an analogy buried in there……

          If that doesn't work, then the easy fallback position is 1.- what OFM said.

          But from another angle: America might well be the last frontier for gratuitous shots, and what better targets than two recent America destroying demagogues?!? Gratuitous shots are all but outlawed in the old world where lawsuits for the smallest slights seem to run rampant. Freedom of Speech needs to be continually honed in the mode of operation wherein there is no doubt that it is being exercised rigorously. Meanwhile, gratuitous shots are currently common and frequent occurrences on the next Constitutional amendment in line, from the radical leftist media arm of the democrat national socialist party. Sticks and stones.

  9. YerushalaimShelanu! says:

    see video of former US Ambassador to the UN Bolton saying Obama could have prevented Palestinian UN vote if he had wanted to _http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/162825

  10. objectivefactsmatter says:

    “Islam is escalating and cannot be resisted. I pray that Allah may tear apart America just as the Soviet Union was torn apart.”

    LOL. Only liberals can destroy America.

  11. Drakken says:

    Well objectivefactsmatter, we ain't played cowboys and muslims yet.

    • objectivefactsmatter says:

      "we ain't played cowboys and muslims yet."

      If we had, history would have repeated itself already in certain minor ways. I'd rather just get rid of them immediately in handcuffs and be done with it. No need for more than that, and then deportation hearings without liberal traitors interfering. Then we're done domestically and we can take care of the foreign jihadis without all of the local agitation.

Speak Your Mind

*