It is one of the “what ifs” of history: Would Algeria have had a brighter future had it remained under French rule? One certainly could argue that with continued access to French language and culture, manners and moeures, the Algerian population would have been imbued with European civilization — and would have benefitted from the cultural inheritance of the West. Instead, successive regimes of fanatically pro-independence leaders and Islamist groups seem to have repudiated the country’s European roots.
Mind, I am not necessarily arguing for the superiority of one culture over another; rather, I am extolling the virtues and benefits of having different cultural and linguistic traditions interact with — or “encounter” (in post-modern parlance) — each other. The assimilation, blending and intermingling of different cultures and traditions within the bosom of the West throughout history is precisely what has made Western civilization vibrant, resilient and strong.
Is all this a veiled defense of colonialism? No, it really isn’t. But it is a critique of the common and widely-held assumption that European colonial powers only brought suffering, exploitation and destruction to their former colonies. Such overly simplistic arguments — sadly, too common among liberal internationalists and Marxist academics — ignore the benefits and contributions that colonists brought to the developing world.
The political institutions and administrative procedures inherited by India from Britain, for example, have contributed directly to its growth. Similar things can be said of Hong Kong. (For an excellent explanation of Hong Kong’s success under the British, find the pre-handover speech, “Two Cheers for Colonialism,” delivered in 1997 by Derek Davies, former editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review). Algeria, in contrast, has retained precious little of its French colonial past.
A Parisian friend recently told me that his mother and her family had visited the capital of Algiers a few years ago. They had been pieds-noirs. He recounted how they had visited their ancestral home, with the permission of its new occupants, and had been surprised to find many of the family’s belongings — 19th century paintings, heirloom furniture, etc. — still there, just as the family had left them in the 1960s. The only difference was that everything was covered in dust and grime, the paintings were faded, the furniture was damaged, all of it neglected by the families now sharing the house.
My friend’s family recognized that none of it belonged to them anymore; but they were still heart-broken to see so many reminders of what once was — ruined remnants of European civilization. It was, my friend said, almost like seeing a lonely old ghost wander the halls of a forgotten, ruined palace: hauntingly tragic — and a reminder that Europe’s cultural legacy is eroding around the world.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Pages: 1 2
To the whole of this great article I would say, yes;
"Try all things, hold fast that which is good."—maybe kind of like a cow has what for to handle this or that roughage, because Western Culture came so equipped, it is able to eschew the evil and to assimilate the best of other sources. And, to the extent that, Islam is not nearly so much a religion but a criminal ideology—as has been ever and anon, and so must it continue—the inferior nations are to continue in pupilage, and at the grace of those which occupy the place of the superior. Oddly enough, our Lame Street media in all ways appears as wishing to hold these backward and perennially regressive groups in contemplation as nations of equal status. When the Australians came to New Guinea, the commander bought a pig, and shooting it in the sight of the tribal leaders, communicated to them that, if cannibalism continued there, the pig's fate would be the fate of them, also. And, that's the story of how cannibalism in modern times, ceased.
I would say, in duties and responsibilities, for some time now, the Western Powers have been grossly remiss—as in dealing with the Taliban, say, . . .
To many commentators I have to say that when France left Algeria 75% of the people were illiterate. When the new government wanted to start new building projects, they found that there was only one Muslim Algerian architect in the whole country! France did a lot for Algeria, but very little for Algerians. Most of previous French colonies are poor today- not a coincidence. France offered discrimination and marginalization and poverty and cooperated with the settlers who had taken over the best land of Algeria. So please let's not imagine a glorious era of colonialism.
Also recommend a book (and movie of the same name) called 'The Lost Command' by Jean Larteguy (in addition to 'The Battle of Algiers').
And, after reading PhillipGaley's comment above, is that not what 'The West' is doing? Ceding the world to cannibals that utterly consume body, mind, and spirit. Poverty, dust, deterioration, and then horror.
Corrrection: Jean Larteguy's book was entitled 'The Centurions', on which the movie 'The Lost Command' was based. Starred Anthony Quinn, Alan Delon, and George Segal (who of all things played a former French paratrooper and Algerian native on the Algerian insurgent side).
Where will all this end? No one, bar China, can really challenge the West, and they won't, yet we are being terrorised in everyway by idiots and buffoons, by people and societies we could crush in a weekend.
If Romney was a real Republican he would crush Obama, but he isn't, so he might lose, then what?
The reason the French left was that international pressure was put on them to leave. The country that put the most pressure? The United States of America. We must hold our heads in shame because the French were winning.
I think that flyingtiger may want to remember something. To us at the time,Algeria was suffering terribly under French rule. I think it gave us memories of how we were treated under British rule. We had no idea how things would turn out. We thought things would turn out all right. There are very few Algerians who live in the United States,not comparable to those who live in France. I believe we thought we were doing the right thing. There are those like flyingtiger that say different. I'll be honest. I don't know how it would have been if the French held on to Algeria. I don't know at all.
Some years ago I had a conversation with an old Algerian Berber who had moved to Australia. He had been a politically active young man during the 1950s in both France and Algeria, and had been jailed by both sides at one time or another.
His summation of what happened?
"We made a huge mistake. We should have taken what was on offer from the French Govt, which was Algeria to become a full part of Metropolitan France, with all that it entailed. Instead, we shot ourselves in the foot to create a disaster area." That is a direct quote, it is something I remember very clearly, and was so succint that I pulled a note pad out and wrote it down.
LOL….the natural nexus has arrived ……now we have one who is likely a conservative , making the case for colonialism .. Totally ignoring the fact that colonialism itself is the primary cause of the situation many ex-colonies find themselves in .
Save all your anecdotal stories , weak arguments and sorry excuses , no people wish to be ruled by foreigners and would rather be free for better or for worse . We in the US of all people should know that better than most .
What is this ? Some ideology huh ! Look at haiti , a dismall failure , but they suffered terrible abuse under the French , in fact Haiti is STILL paying France for it's expenses to occuppy and rulee them !!!! The author and ANYONE who agrees with this article have lost their minds .
algeria was a barbary state, a haven for musulmaniac pirates bent on raiding European shore towns and taking Europeans as slaves or for ramson, oh but Europe is the primary cause for that situation as it was developed an rich, doesn't it, you moron? And you should remember the negroes from haiti are as foreigners to that island as were the French, you idiot, and those negroes invaded the other country on the Hispaniola island which was Dominican Republic, so, poor, poor negroes.
Algeria before muslim invasions was a land of a people called Berbers you f—king dolt . And in the Caribbean WHO brought the Negroes there to begin with SCHMUCKO ? So I guess you're one of the assssholes who agrees huh ?
Man ….sooooo many asssssholes , soooo little time !
Go back to your video games jerkoff .
"…I am not necessarily arguing for the superiority of one culture over another…." Why not? Why do so many "intellectuals" have such reluctance to weigh value, to make judgement calls? Islamic culture is vastly inferior to western culture for so many reasons obvious to all but the imbeciles among us. This defense of colonialism is almost apologetic. Tribal cultures cannot produce "miracle" drugs that kill disease, modern hospitals, rockets that take men to the moon, modern agriculture that feeds billions, and so on. I would not suggest for a second that colonialism is without fault or deny that it created innocent victims, but when uncivilized cultures gain modern weapons and are left alone to wreak havoc, all of us are put at risk.
France failed in Algeria for the same reason that the United States failed in Iraq and will fail in Afghanistan. They did not destroy Islam. It is no more possible to civilize an Islamic country than it is to clean a swimming pool when there is a pipe dumping raw sewage into it. Think of everything the French accomplished in Algeria–infrastructure, schools, draining malarial swamps–as stuff they jammed into the pipe. That didn't cut off the flow, however, and after 130 years the pipe was so backed up that the French civilizatory blockage was dislodged by a big torrent of Mohammedan crap.
If the French had not been so in love with the garbage called laicité–which is eating away at their society to this day–they would have restored Algeria to Western civilization, which is to say, to Christianity. Indeed, the country was the native land of Saint Augustine, before there was such a thing as Islam. Mohammedanism belongs in North Africa no more than it belongs in Paris itself. It would have been fitting and proper to eradicate it. In other words, the sewage pipe should have been disconnected, dug up, and sent to the junkyard; blocking it was not enough.
We gringos, in our recent Middle Eastern misadventures, did not even try to block the pipe. Even doing that much was deemed too politically incorrect. Instead, we simply pretended the sewage was an asset to the pool. "Once you understand sewage, how rich and complex it is, you see that it's really wonderful," said our leaders. So our own mission civilisatrice–instead of being successful for a century–was good for about ten minutes, the time it took for some jihadist to look up on the 'Net how to rig a car with explosives.
Well the French were not battling islam in Algeria , although since then islam dominates in a different way .Anyone attempting to make a case for colonialism has got rocks in their head . The middle East , Pakistan , Vietnam ,Cambodia , all are glaring examples of the direct result of colonialism . Not to mention Africa . Sooner or later by sheer force of human nature , any people will shed the restraints of colonialism . What in the hell is the matter with you people ?
Typical reaction of someone who reads carelessly and who takes away only what he wants to understand. A more appropriate response to you, sir, is to ask; What is the matter with all of you who, with little reflection or analysis, celebrate all independence movements without regard for consequences, without regard for the people within those countries? In all the examples you list, the correct question is to ask why are they so underdeveloped, so chaotic, so miserable? You seem to put all the blame on colonialism. But there were many, many other factors. You clearly have drunk from the Marxist Kool-aid for too long.
Of course they were battling Islam! Why do Pentagon leaders and other Islamic counter-insurgency experts study the battle of Algiers to this day — because it has direct relevance to what the West is facing now!
The Algerians earned their independence and it was not granted as mentioned in your article.
"Earned"??? They terrorized their own people …