Media Covers Up Muslim Mass Shooter in California


Muslim activists often complain that murders by Muslims are over-reported. In fact they are often under-reported.

Ali Syed shot six people in Orange County, killing three of them, and yet the story has not gotten the media coverage of other mass shootings. The media has reported it, but has failed to highlight it. And the word “Muslim” never appears in the report.

A series of freeway shootings Tuesday in Orange County, Calif., has left four people dead, including the suspect, and three people injured, the Tustin Police Department said.

Tustin Police Chief Scott Jordan identified the gunman as Ali Syed, a 20-year-old unemployed part-time student, who lived in the Ladera Ranch home where the first victim, a woman, was killed.

The shootings began shortly before 4:45 a.m. when deputies responding to a call found the body of a dead female shot multiple times in a house in Ladera Ranch.

At 5:10 a.m., police in Tustin received a call about a man with a gun at a major intersection, police spokesman Lt. Paul Garaven said. Syed had attempted to steal a car, Garaven said. When the car’s owner drove off, Syed shot and wounded him, he said.

Syed then crossed the street to a gas station where he carjacked a pickup truck. This time, Garaven said, “no rounds were fired. He just took the car and fled.”

Several minutes later, police received another report of a car jacking in Santa Ana. Syed had ordered the victim out of the car, walked him to the median strip and shot him in the back, killing him, Garaven said.

The gunman then drove two miles south where he killed a third victim and shot another person in the arm, he said. This time, Syed stole a white utility vehicle. Witnesses called in sightings to the California Highway Patrol, which spotted and began following the vehicle, Garaven said. At 5:50 a.m., Garaven said, the vehicle slowed, Syed exited and then shot himself in the head.

Throughout the hour-long ordeal, Syed apparently shot at others on the highway, Garaven said. At least three people reported that the suspect shot at their cars, including one person with minor injuries, he said.

Investigators are searching for a motive, Garaven said. Syed had no criminal record, he said. The gun, a 12-gauge shotgun, is no registered to him and had been purchased more than a year ago at a sporting goods store, he said. Federal authorities are tracing the gun, he said.

Again background checks and an assault rifle ban would have done nothing to prevent it.  And this comes after Biden turned into a non-stop shotgun salesman. Because you can’t actually stop gun violence by banning one type of weapon. It doesn’t work.

The first victim was Courtney Aoki, a 20-year-old who was shot in the same house that Syed lived. Then Melvin Edwards, 69 and 26-year-old construction worker Jeremy Lewis during carjackings.

Edwards served as a U.S. Army combat infantry officer in Vietnam and graduated from the University of Southern California, according to a biography on his company’s website. He and his wife, Cheryl, had celebrated their 42nd anniversary on Feb. 12 and have two adult children.

 

Comments

  1. BLJ says:

    Of course the media will never focus on the fact this savage is a Muslim. Just like they don't focus on our Muslim President. The low life then takes the cowards way out.

  2. Mary Sue says:

    Interesting. Yeah when i saw the name in the story that i saw in the news, I had the sneaking suspicion the guy is a muslim.

  3. Jeff says:

    This administration had no problem accusing a Coptic for the riots and causing the deaths of 4 Americans in Libya. Recently heard that 2 coptcs were beheaded in NJ and those involved in the movie sentenced to death by proxy in Egypt.. We have not seen the end of that accusation. Yet, here we go again ignoring facts that are more than likely pertinent to this mass shooting.

  4. Jerry says:

    Didn't hear the word "Christian" mentioned much either after Newtown, Aurora, Tucson and Columbine.

    • John Spielman says:

      That's because they were not followers of Christ Jesus. There is nothing in the New Testament of the Bible that allows violence against anyone(note Luke chapter19 refers to the end of the age when Jesus tear turns and His Holy angels destroy all opposition )

    • Arlie says:

      Tucson – had a skull on altar on patio – some kind of devil worship – loved abortion – hated Bush
      Aurora – Staff worker 0bama campaign – OWS – progressive liberal
      Newtown – hated Christians
      http://www.gulagbound.com/37375/evidence-mounts-per-mass...

    • Indioviejo says:

      You are fallacious. All non Muslims are not Christians.

    • jakespoon says:

      Where in the teachings of Jesus does it say to kill people who don't believe in Him?When they came to take Him away.Peter drew a sword to protect The Lord. Jesus made him put it away and do you know what He told Peter? If you do,please reply.

    • Mary Sue says:

      That's because NONE of those shooters were Christian, AT ALL. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold of Columbine, SPECIFICALLY, were vocal atheists prior to their demise.

      • Jeff Bargholz says:

        Jerky,

        actually the media tried as hard as they could to point people in the direction of Christians and conservatives, despite the fact that all the shooters you named were Christian hating leftists just like you.

        Islamopithecines murder people in the name of their mythological moon god every single day. Christians do not do it at all.

        For outstanding achievement in left-wing stupidity your drive-by diatribe deserves honorable mention in the Newdow Awards.

    • Michael Copeland says:

      Christians are commanded "Thou shalt not kill".
      Muslims are commanded "Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them" Koran 9:5.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM says:

        Plus kill the apostates, kill the women who "dishonor the family".

        Now 70,000+ have died in Syria. It's just Arabs killing Arabs so no matter for the hijacked UN or the FAKE "anti-war" socialists.

      • Teacher says:

        Deuteronomy 13: 6 "If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;"

        Deuteronomy 13:8-9 "Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people."

        Rom.14:23 He that doubteth is damned…. For whatever is not of faith is sin.

        Matthew 1:34, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword"

        Luke 22:36, "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one"

    • KTH says:

      Point me to the ten most recent examples of Christians killing in the name of Christ…
      And no stuttering, please!…

    • dave says:

      That's because they were not Christians..They were dumbass Liberals!!!

  5. g_jochnowitz says:

    I am reminded of the Brink's robbery and shootout of 1981, carried out by the Black Liberation Army. Why should we want terrorist groups to have access to guns?

    • Rifleman says:

      When have terrorist groups ever not had access to guns?

    • jakespoon says:

      Yeah,you're right.Mad dog,bloody-minded terrorist just might not use a gun if they know they are illegal.

      • g_jochnowitz says:

        Our gun laws are inadequate and always have been.

        • jakespoon says:

          Here's some news for you sunshine; laws are for law abiding people, criminals could care less about a gun law. That's why they're criminals. Name one criminal that will obey the law.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            Laws are meant to be enforced. Sometimes the enforcement succeeds almost all the time; sometimes it succeeds only part of the time.
            Should we abandon laws against murder because murders still take place despite these laws?

        • JacksonPearson says:

          The Second Amendment to the Constitution, is the ONLY gun law we have!

          • WilliamJamesWard says:

            Having terrorists live in our Nation is the fault of the American government and
            the Obama regeme's import crew, he brings it on us but does not get the scrutiny
            and blame he deserves…………………………William

          • JacksonPearson says:

            Yes….Look here under "Key Findings" :
            http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/

          • WilliamJamesWard says:

            Great link!!!…………………….William

          • JacksonPearson says:

            You're welcome….
            Frank Gaffney is tops in exposing the Muslim Brotherhood in America.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            Here is the text of the Second Amerndment:
            "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
            Letting psychotics, fanatics and other nuts have free access to guns is not well regulated. It is not a militia. It endangers the security of a free state.

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            genital-jockitch,

            you just quoted two separate rights in the Second Ammendment.

            "Psychotics, fanatics and other nuts" do NOT "have free access to guns."

            No law can prevent criminals from possessing guns and no government attempt to disarm Americans of their legal guns would be successful-no matter how many law abiding citizens it would be willing to kill in the process.

            And do try to remember that America shares an unsecured 2000 mile long border with the hyper murderous gun culture of Mexico.

            How many children and infidels have to die because gun control fanatics wont allow the rest of us to use our Second Ammendment right to shoot back at lunatics and jihadis? Thanks to prigs like you and totalitarian government officials the death toll is racking up with no end in sight.

            ONE PREVENTABLE DEATH IS TOO MANY.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            New York City has the strictest gun laws and the lowest crime rate in the United States. Gun control saves lives. Look at murder rates around the country.
            ONE PREVENTABLE DEATH IS TOO MANY.

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            genital_jockitch,

            New York City does NOT have the strictest gun control laws OR the lowest crime rate in America. Those claims are demonstrably and outrageously FALSE.

            GUN CONTROL KILLS. Look at murder rates around the country. Cities with truly oppressive gun control laws like Chicago and LA have huge death rates while EVERY SINGLE COMMUNITY WITH A RIGHT TO CARRY LAW HAS AN EXTREMELY LOW RATE OF CUN CRIME. The rate of guns being used to prevent gun violence on the part of criminals outnumbers the rate of criminal gun violence by more than a thousand to one.

            ONE PREVENTABLE DEATH IS TOO MANY.

            A lie told often enough doesn't become the truth, no matter what uncle Vladimir told you.

            Put some anti-fungal creme for your itch, dude. I think the rot has spread to your brain.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            Here is a quote from the Wikipedia article on crime in New York City:
            "Starting in 2005, New York City achieved the lowest crime rate among the ten largest cities in the United States.[11] Since 1991, the city has seen a continuous fifteen-year trend of decreasing crime. Neighborhoods that were once considered dangerous are now much safer. Violent crime in the city has dropped by three quarters in the twelve years ending in 2005 with the murder rate at its lowest then level since 1963 with 539 murders that year, for a murder rate of 6.58 per 100,000 people, compared to 2,245 murders in 1990. In 2009, the low would be displaced. Among the 182 U.S. cities with populations of more than 100,000, New York City ranked 136th in overall crime.[12]"
            On to a different subject: Politeness costs nothing and wins everything.

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            genital_jockitch,

            trying to settle a debate by using a phony encyclopedia that can-and is-edited by any sub-intellectual ideologue with access to a computer works. It just works in the opposite way it's intended.

            Besides, there is no real debate on the subject because carry laws are proved to reduce crime while excessive gun control laws are proved to increase it. The facts and figures don't lie, though that never stops leftist totalitarians from lying about them.

            Even the phony stats on Weakipedia fail to support your idiotic claims. Did you bother to read them?

            I'm not out to win a prize and being polite to fanatics like you only encourages you to work even more fevierishly towards your destructive goals.

            Our government ABSOLUTELY cannot be trusted with all the guns (the ultimate goal of all gun control fanatics) and ONE PREVENTABLE DEATH IS TOO MANY.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            Here are crime rates by states: http://www.census.gov/statab/ranks/rank21.html

          • JacksonPearson says:

            An average of 40 thousand people die on American highways every year, so what's more lethal, guns or cars?

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            Itchy,

            what was that census sheet supposed to prove? It simply listed violence rates by state. It did not address gun violence at all but the states with right to carry laws were still the lowest in the rankings. That proves my point.

            Most right to carry laws are local so the only state listings that matter are the ones that allow it statewide, allow it in many areas or ban it statewide or in many areas. That also proves my point.

            New Hampshire and Vermont have the lowst gun violence rates in the country and both are right to carry states. Arizona would be down there too if it didn't share a border with Mexico. And that also proves my point.

            I guess your testicles had to be removed due to your extreme case of crotch rot. Being neutered explains your girly hatred of guns in the hands of private citizens and your attraction to shoot 'em up cops you see in hollywood productions.

            Do you have any more links that prove my points? The NRA? Lotrimin? Chipendales?

          • joe says:

            Do you understand the concept of legally and illegally aquired guns ?
            Do you not understand we have thousands of unenforced gun laws ?
            Your complaint should be directed at the failed mental health ,legal and government systems that allow unstable people access to weapons .

          • JacksonPearson says:

            When challenged in court, all gun control laws go down. Why?…Because in a nutshell, they're unconstitutional. The most powerful part is, "shall not be infringed."

            Anti gun zealots like Dianne Feinstein dance around, and fly threw the Constitutional flame, but when push come to shove in court, they flame out. They know that a Constitutional Amendment would go nowhere, so they continue to cause pain to honest citizens.

          • JacksonPearson says:

            Oh yes, and let's not forget the main clause:
            "shall not be infringed"

            BTW, did you as a low information Obama supporter know, that "ObamaCare," or "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PPACA), has a section devoted to the "Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights." Get a pdf copy, and do a "Second Amendment" search.

          • g_jochnowitz says:

            That's not a clause. It's a verb phrase.

          • JacksonPearson says:

            Whatever…In the English language, it still means exactly that…:
            "shall not be infringed."

          • JacksonPearson says:

            Once more???
            BTW, did you as a low information Obama supporter know, that "ObamaCare," or "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PPACA), has a section devoted to the "Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights." Get a pdf copy, and do a "Second Amendment" search.

          • JacksonPearson says:

            <blink>{{{CRICKETS}}}</blink>

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            g_jockitch;

            Pettifoggery is a fallacious argumentation technique. That is precisely why you use it, of course.

  6. Anglophilic says:

    This "filtering" of news has been going on for a very long time. They could'nt filter out 9/11/01. Thats when i started to dig for better information, and found it on the internet. I was shocked at how the liberal media was filtering our news. They are a treasonous bunch.

  7. Arlie says:

    As soon as I saw this story and read his name I knew it…creepy.

  8. Nigel Waddington says:

    For the media to be covering up something, there (obviously) has to be a fact which is being covered up.
    Greenfield has failed to establish this. While there is a significant possibility that Ali Syed is in fact a Muslim, anyone making the claim that the media are "covering up the fact that he's Muslim" – if they're to be taken seriously as credible and ethical journalists, that is – need to establish that as a fact.

    The second concern with this article is that it's focusing on "Muslim" rather than "Islam". Even if Syed turns out to be a Muslim, is there any evidence that this was a major causative factor in his rampage?
    If there were no cries of "Alluha Akhbar" or similar heard by witnesses, then it's highly unlikely that this shooting was motivated by Islamic Jihad.

    None of these are trivial points! With Political Islam spreading, those behind its spread have a vested interest in ensuring that Counter-Jihadists are fed with propaganda which misdirects their energy and discredits their message thus rendering them ineffective. Obviously, such propaganda will need to *sound* anti-Islamic.
    It appears this article should be seen in that light.

    • Jeff Bargholz says:

      Nigel Wadeater,

      fellow traveling dhimmies like you say the same thing every single time islamopithecines go on the rampage. Every single time-including 911.

      Just convert to islam and STFU already.

      • Nigel Waddington says:

        This is the kind of puerile comment which can be expected from either morons or those who willfully aid and abet the Islamisation agenda by "opposing" it with fallacious nonsense.

        Lenin is credited with saying words to the effect of, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves".

        Anyone who doesn't understand that large agendas (in this case, the Islamisation of the West) require the utilisation of fake oppositions to them, needs to get off the battlefield and educate themselves about the enemy.

        That, or be dismissed as the kind of useful idiots and/or plants which Jeff Bargholz seems content to act as.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM says:

          The more Muslims / Islamists commit atrocities in the West, the more "Islamophobia" grows.

          There will be a tipping point where all Hell will break loose on Islam.

          The future for Islam in the West or apologists for Islamofascism is dim.

        • Marc says:

          Nigel just because this Muslim didn't yell Allah Akbar does not mean that He is not a follower of Islam. Nigel there is a way to stop all these Islamic terrorists from killing us. DON'T LET THEM IN.

          • Nigel Waddington says:

            I'm rather more interested in defeating the Islamisation agenda than getting too distracted by the decoys it throws at us.
            Clearly, encouraging Muslim immigration, and then encouraging them to continue embracing Islamic ideology is a large part of that agenda.

        • Jeff Bargholz says:

          Nigel Wadeater,

          right. Because identifying Ali Syed as an islamopithecine aids islam. The best way to fight stealth jihad is by ignoring it.

          What was that you wrote about useful idiots?

          • Nigel Waddington says:

            "The best way to fight stealth jihad is by ignoring it."

            Sounds like a strawman.
            Who's making such a suggestion?

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            Nigel Wadeater;

            My mistake. You claimed the best way to fight stealth jihad was by refusing to report on it. You must be so proud of your dhimmie distinction.

          • Nigel Waddington says:

            "You claimed the best way to fight stealth jihad was by refusing to report on it."

            Another strawman.
            Readers who are familiar with COINTELPRO and how it operates will likely see the patterns of its modus operandi in Bargholz's comments.

          • Jeff Bargholz says:

            Nigel Wadeater,

            Another strawman? You wrote that it is a mistake to identify jihadi murderers as the islamopithecines they are, you leg humping imbecile. You also wrote that jihad murders are a "distraction." The only strawman are the ones you're beating off.

            Why do you Moby islamopithecine pedophiles like you aways think they're so clever when they're accuse somebody else of being the actual cyber-stealth jihadi?

            Strap on a suicide belt and show us the strength of your convictions. Join Lil' Mohammad in Hell and you can have 72 big buck demons using you as a virgin too. Your lifetime of shunning soap and toilet paper will come in handy.

          • Nigel Waddington says:

            " You wrote that it is a mistake to identify jihadi murderers as the islamopithecines they are, you leg humping imbecile."

            Yet another strawman!
            Lots of ad hominem, as well as the COINTELPRO signature of self-discrediting via extensive deployment of profanity – this time without cunningly falling just within the FPM comment guidelines.

  9. Bright Knight says:

    That happens every single day in Europe. Even if the Medias report about those crimes, they don't call a spade a spade, in this case a Muslim a Muslim. They use all kind of paraphrases. In Germany and Austria the medias call them “Suedlaender” (people from a Southern country), in UK they are called “Asians”, but in the meantime most people know, that they write about Muslims (very often the kind of the crime and how it was committed leads clearly to a Muslim). So the medias just use names which are usual in the particular country. In Germany, for example, they write “Lars” instead of “Ali” or “Muhammad”.

  10. guest says:

    Perhaps Obama's government will allow the man to join in a Peace and Reintegration Program like Karzai's here in Afghanistan. He then could get a job in the government, military, or police. We must find a way to turn these people from the Taliban. The Quran says as does the Bible, "Thou shall not kill" in same words or similar. The butthead in the story is to quote many mullahs and mawlawis here in Afghanistan…"an infidel, a Kafir no better than the foreigners." I've been deployed to Afghanistan for going on 2 years and I can honestly say I know the pulse of 1/4 of the country. Hang this MF, drag his body through the streets, and then piss on his body. Maybe they'll stand up and take notice.

  11. Nanis says:

    How can this be he looks so innocen t(sarcasm). They are letting muslims get away with so many things in America if they ever decide to stop them is going to be too late cant we learn from the Europeans? He probably thought he was going to go to heaven to get his 70 virgins.

  12. Edward Cline says:

    The Media's behavior reminds me of that Noel Coward wartime song, "Don't Let's Be Beastly to the Germans." He wrote it in answer to "a small minority of excessive humanitarians, who, in my opinion, were taking a rather too tolerant view of our enemies."Of course, our Media are tolerant to the point of self-inflicted blindness.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wveW9Tw2JKE

  13. TheThwart says:

    There is no mention of 'Muslim' in the legitimate report on this incident so Greenfield decides to plant it in his copy and paste. Where is your PROOF Greenfield? Because you believe his name is indicative? Crackpot conspiracy theorists like Greenfield are the ones who weave the seeds of anarchy into the American fabric. But then Horowitz is a bigger fear-monger than most and probably condones crap like this. What a putz. And shame on anyone who believes this tripe. Educate yourselves, do your own research and stop getting sucked into this type of bigoted hate-baiting… unless you are the type that thrives on garbage like this.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM says:

      TheTwat,

      Let me get this straight.

      Greenfield is the hate monger, not the Islamist killer of 3 people?

      I hope the media reports on the contents of the home of the Islamist animal.

      If the Ali animal was incarcerated before his rampage, 3 innocent people would still be alive.

    • Marc says:

      What part of Ali Syed does not make him a person of Arab origin? Wart you need to look around you and read some viable newspapers. The only anarchy in America is people like you that still doubts what's really happening in America. Wart one day soon you will wake up to sharia law in the USA.

    • Jeff Bargholz says:

      The Twat,

      according to the latest news, it turns out Syed was an islamopithecine after all. His name was indicative after all. He was a jihadi terrorist after all.

      Conspiracies require more than one shooter and I'm pretty sure Greenfield isn't a member of a Jewish cabal hatching plots to" weave the seeds of anarchy into the American fabric" and Horowitz is not a fear-monger for exposing the enemies of America. Enemies like you.

      Islamopithecines are our frinds and fellow citizens. Syed was just a "random shooter" indulging in "workplace violence" or "free religious expression."

      Shame on anyone who believes this tripe. Educate yourselves, do your own research and stop getting sucked into this type of bigoted hate-baiting… unless you are the type that thrives on garbage like this.

  14. SCREW SOCIALISM says:

    Good for the NYPD monitoring Muslims in New Jersey.

    The FBI monitors white supremacist kkk savages, so monitoring Islamofascists savages is unfortunately necessary too.

  15. joe says:

    "Educate yourselves, do your own research and stop getting sucked into this type of bigoted hate-baiting."
    1. everyone avoids comments that use this rude,superior attitude language .
    2. everyone here has educated themselves about islam . The hundreds of millions dead bodies ,religiously sanctioned hate and murder,parasitic lifestyles and crude 7th century mentality tell the tale well.

  16. cynthia curran says:

    Ali Syed shot six people in Orange County, killing three of them, and yet the story has not gotten the media coverage of other mass shootings. The media has reported it, but has failed to highlight it. And the word “Muslim” never appears in the report. The OC doesn't look like what the media states its over 30 percent foreign born and yes being a Muslin is not mention.

  17. cynthia curran says:

    Well, Orange County had two starnge incidences with gunviolence. Irvine with Dorner and Syad lived in low crime Ladera Ranch.

  18. nonhyphenatedcdn says:

    My American cousins will do nothing about the Muslim cancer slithering into North America until it's too late! Both Canada & the US seem to have a long history of doing nothing until it's almost too late. From dealing with Hitler & Tojo until the present day. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Not only has the war already started, but so has the killing raping & pillaging. Can you build a Christian church in a Muslim country? NO YOU CANNOT! Can somebody try to convert a Muslim in a Muslim country. Sure if you want to be beheaded you can. But we allow this garbage here don't we. I guess we believe they need a place to recruit & train radicals.

  19. J-LEW Forever says:

    My cousin was the third victim, Jeremy Lewis. This website should be shut down because it celebrates hatred and encourages violence. It's not hard to find killers of every kind, from every religion in the history of mankind. For those that don't know, suicide is completely forbidden in Islam. But, I know it's hard to escape social traps and it's always easier to generalize than to understand that violence and death are part of the human condition. I believe that there are movements by certain Islamic groups and Muslims that could threaten the safety of the world if it's not dealt with. I also believe that Christians and Christian countries have been involved in killings that are easily on the same level of Muslims. I don't know why I'm comparing and contrasting because in the end, hatred is the problem. I really think the kind of thinking that's been displayed on this website is just gonna hurt us… What's so bad about the idea of peace and positivity? K, that's all guys, I hope we can move forward past all this nonsense that clearly won't help us. Peace guys. We're lucky to be alive. We should lead by good example.

  20. Hello my loved one! I want to say that this article is amazing, nice written and include
    almost all important infos. I would like to peer extra
    posts like this .

  21. Gia says:

    Orange County and the rest of America need to wake up. The hatred of SOME Muslims towards Americans is now in our communities! The shooting in Orange County and other places in America is all the evidence we need.

    While Americans are ‘forced’ to respect and accept the Muslim culture so should it be that they respect the American culture and our religions. Will they be satisfied when Muslim Mosques are built in each of our neighborhoods? What is their main goal? Is it to convert us; destroy our way of life; or introduce their laws to America? These are legitimate questions we need to ask. Our country has changed. It is up to all of us to help steer it in the right direction. We all know the violence in our streets is unacceptable.

    Although, I don’t believe ALL Muslims are evil, I am concerned about the loss of life and violence some inflict on Americans. More evidence that the war is here.

    Let’s use technology to our advantage to become informed citizens. Research to find out who and what is in your community before it is too late. Write your local and federal representatives and make them aware that we care about what is happening to our country.

Speak Your Mind

*