I covered the religion beat for Canada’s biggest newspaper back in the 1990s. My first blog (circa 2000) was called RelapsedCatholic, “where the religious rubber meets the pop culture road.” And I used to write for The Door, which proudly describes itself as the world’s only Christian satire magazine/homeless shelter/private detective agency.
(“Detective agency,” because, if [...]
Related posts:
- Media Matters: Marx's own words aren't Marxist (you crazy stupid rednecks!)
- Most Obscene Tweet of the Day: Ana Marie “Wonkette” Cox Unloads on Pat Robertson
- Media Matters channels Homer Simpson: ‘Everyone is stupid except me’
My good friend Brian recently put together a very good video exposing Al Gore’s utter hypocrisy. It pretty clearly shows that Gore’s a fake and a political opportunist of the worst kind.
The video particularly focuses on his position on outsourcing, and starts out by looking at his position in the 1993 NAFTA debate and the [...]
Related posts:
- The Leftist Politics of the Nobel Peace Prize, Part 1
- Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes Down Since 2001; Liberals Fear “Backlash” Against Muslims, Ignore Rise in Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes–From Muslims?
- Al Gore, Climate-Killing Carnivore
One of the Left’s favorite pastimes is to sneer at conservative family-values rhetoric. It usually goes something like this: “How dare you suggest that we don’t have values, just because we believe in marriage equality and a woman’s right to choose?” But a recent piece by The Daily Beast’s Conor Friedersdorf illustrates that there is [...]
Related posts:
- Sean Hannity, Miss California, & the Dangers of Hero Worship
- New York Times develops strange new respect for laws, ethics and stuff
- Marxist Scholars go After Dead Liberal Icon on "Democracy Now!"
Three full days after he wondered why no one had punched Joe Lieberman (“Traitor Joe,” as he calls him), Ed Schultz of MSNBC’s The Ed Show insisted no one on the Left had ever defamed the distinguished senator from Connecticut. Last night, Schultz asked former Republican Congressman Ernest Istook about Democratic infighting over the health [...]
Related posts:
- Genius Envy: Ed Schultz’s Plan to Motivate Joe Lieberman is “Punching the Guy Out”
- Ben Johnson’s “Genius Envy” Takes on Ed Schultz
- Genius Envy: War on Terror, No! War on “Conservadems,” Yes!
ObamaCare has been stripped of its most pernicious features.
by
Dick Morris | December 17, 2009 | Posted in
FrontPage |
Read More »
Why the Left is more attractive than the Right.
by
Roger Scruton | December 17, 2009 | Posted in
FrontPage |
Read More »
I don’t know about you but I love horror movies and studying political propaganda, particularly of the cinematic variety. The lucky attendees at the big UN climate conference overseas got to enjoy both. WooHoo!
Guilt-ridden liberals and true believer global warmists were treated to environmentalist horror propaganda at the opening of the summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, [...]
Related posts:
- Palin, Polar Bears and Cheap-Shots: How the Left Ignores the Economy, Fraud and Facts in Pursuit of Their Agenda-Driven Science
- Ridiculing Bush was Cool, Ridiculing Obama is Racist Hate?
- The EPA's Solution to a Problem that May not Exist
by
Matthew Vadum | December 15, 2009 | Posted in
NewsReal Blog |
Read More »
Charles M. Blow sees racism increaing in the age of Obama.
by
Dennis Prager | December 9, 2009 | Posted in
FrontPage |
Read More »
Via Conservatives4Palin comes this article at the Wall Street Journal (of all places), about Arizona Senator (and the GOP’s presidential nominee last year) John McCain’s appearance on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press” earlier today. The article is yet another prime example of how the media purposefully distort comments made by conservatives, to manufacture controversies meant to [...]
Related posts:
- NewsReal Sunday: McCain Rejects Palin Criticism by Former Campaign Manager
- MSNBC's Hot Dog Palin Obsession
- TDB's Tina Brown Explains: Palin's Confidence Based on Ignorance
I have seen “South Park” and I found its anti-censorship message morally refreshing (it is beyond my ken that any conservative could find this film offensive on conservative grounds). What are the implications of Bennett’s argument, except that he considers it worth delivering our right to choose what we can see and know to the [...]