In case you haven’t yet caught up with the Spring 2023 issue of UCLA’s online magazine, its feature story is “The Justice League” by journalist Ashraf Khalil: laudatory profiles of a handful of social justice alumni from a unique UCLA initiative called the Activist-in-Residence Program. Established in 2016 by the Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy, this Program “plugs activists into the power grid of resources offered by a top-tier research university” to empower these aspiring revolutionaries to overthrow the society they despise so deeply.
As described on its website, the Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy “advances radical democracy in an unequal world through research, critical thought, and alliances with social movements and racial justice activism.” By “radical democracy,” they don’t mean individual freedom without limits, but collectivism and enforced equity. Their methodology is almost a parody of woke buzzwords and phraseology such as “decolonizing the University”: “We root our work in abolitionist and decolonial traditions of thought that refuse extractive and exploitative research and instead build forms of knowledge accountable to movements and communities on the frontlines of struggle.”
The Luskin Institute’s Activist-in-Residence initiative grants residents a stipend and free rein of campus resources for five months to develop their varied missions and help educate the next generation of activists. “The UCLA Activist-in-Residence program’s objective is to “turn the university inside out” through “power-shifting scholarship and pedagogy focused on social change.”
“It was a way of shifting who is seen as a scholar, who is seen as a teacher at an elite research university like UCLA,” Professor Ananya Roy, the Luskin Institute’s founding director, told Ashraf Khalil. She added that she wants the program to expand to other universities across the country, envisioning this “shared terrain of scholarship across universities and movements… to be very fertile ground for making change.”
By making change, she means using the Establishment’s own resources to train subversives whose mission is to tear down the Establishment. Hence, the program’s foundational goal of “turning the university inside out” could more properly be expanded to read, “turning society inside out.”
Five former residents of the program are profiled in the UCLA Magazine piece. “Armed with passion, intellect and vision,” Khalil writes, “the bold crusaders of UCLA’s Activist-in-Residence Program are as trailblazing as the initiative itself.”
By the way, I was under the distinct impression that the word “crusaders” is a triggering no-no for woke activists because it evokes images of Islamophobic, 12th century Christian infidels getting all medieval on peaceful Muslims in the Holy Land. Pretty “bold” of journalist Khalil to appropriate it to describe far-Left activists.
Anyway, he goes on to gush about his subjects:
They come from everywhere — unapologetic revolutionaries and leading voices in causes ranging from social justice and climate change to housing rights, racial equity and protections for the most vulnerable among us. They seek resources and space to recharge, regroup and, often, to plan the next stage of their struggle — all while planting seeds to grow the next generation of activists.
These “unapologetic revolutionaries” profiled are: Nigerian-American playwright Funmiloa Fagbamila (year of residency: 2017), who has served as arts and culture director for the Los Angeles affiliate of the “mostly peaceful” domestic terror movement Black Lives Matter (her play The Intersection: Woke Black Folk, has drawn praise from none other than communist and domestic terror icon Angela Davis), and is currently a lecturer in Pan-African studies at Cal State Los Angeles; housing activist and podcaster Theo Henderson (2022), who is challenging the “government policy and popular sentiment” that “wants to make the existence of unhoused* people illegal”; Yvonne Yen Liu (2018), co-founder of the L.A.-based Solidarity Research Center, who has worked for years on what she calls “solidarity economies” based on “equity and inclusivity”; Jane Nguyen (2020), chief of staff to Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia and founder of KTown For All, which fought to protect unhoused individuals in L.A.’s Koreatown; and Micah White (2019), one of the co-creators of the Occupy Wall Street movement. White believes “protests and movements are the manifestation of social forces that push societies to change. Put simply, humanity needs protesters, because without protest there is social stagnation.”
Yes, because humanity is so much better off navigating the violent chaos and economic disruption of Occupy Wall Street riots than the relative stability of social “stagnation.” Besides, there’s big money to be made in protest movements, as the Black Lives Matter leadership can attest, and Micah White is nothing if not a wannabe one-percenter, as FrontPage Mag’s Daniel Greenfield noted in his profile of the Davos-cruising hypocrite.
The truth is that the Activists-in-Residence Program is not about caring visionaries building a new society. Its work is first and foremost about razing the existing society to the ground, because utopia can only be built upon the ashes and ruins of the civilization that these woke fanatics falsely perceive to be systemically oppressive. And the utopian engineering of society always ends in misery, corruption, and totalitarian control. Thus movements like Black Lives Matter and Occupy Wall Street have proven to be not creative and liberating but inherently destructive; they have been responsible for billions of dollars of property damage and untold numbers of destroyed businesses, ravaged neighborhoods, and even lives lost – mostly in the very communities they claim to support. But hey, you can’t make an omelet etc.
Subversive programs like UCLA’s Activists-in-Residence, which UCLA Film School alumnus Larry Jarvik described bluntly in an email as “a slush fund for Party apparatchiks,” are one of the reasons the David Horowitz Freedom Center is calling for the federal defunding of universities. As Shillman Fellow Daniel Greenfield noted last summer about UCLA specifically,
Despite UCLA’s growing extremism, its core budget in past years was funded at as much as a third by California taxpayers. In 2015, UCLA received $440 million from the state. And the nation’s taxpayers, through the federal government, provide a majority of its research grants amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars more in money flowing through the system.
As a public university, UCLA is a non-profit under 501(c)(3) even though it has long ceased to function as a non-partisan institution and has become an aggressive leftist political machine.
UCLA spends over $1 million on political lobbyists.
Its personnel rank as 47 out of 25,950 in political funding and have provided almost $1 million to the DNC, $400,947 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, $181,468 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and $151,650 to the House Majority PAC in the 2022 cycle alone. Even though Senator Raphael Warnock, a racist Georgia politician, is on the other side of the country, UCLA’s leftists still poured $124,881 into his campaign.
In 2020, UCLA personnel funded Biden to the tune of almost $4 million and nearly another million to Bernie Sanders, along with millions more to various leftist election PACs.
UCLA is no longer a serious academic institution. Its “woke” faculty are purging credible academic figures like Joseph H. Manson and others, while cultivating an atmosphere of hatred on campus and using a taxpayer-funded institution for political and anti-American activity.
It’s time for the IRS to pull UCLA’s non-profit status.
Indeed it is. UCLA and its Activist-in-Residence program are not apolitical educational institutions serving the community and the country, but moneyed engines of far-Left radicalism openly dedicated to dismantling the greatest civilization in history, and replacing it with the failed god of social justice. Pulling the plug on these “unapologetic revolutionaries” is a critical first step to taking our country back.
* “Unhoused” is the woke term for “homeless.”
GOP Congress could defund Federal money for UCLA tomorrow — why don’t they?
Most republicans really aren’t much different than their leftist colleagues. Very few true conservatives left in the republican party.
Unfortunately, so much these days just gives an appearance of legitimacy to Scott Adams’ recent comments. Glad I attended UCLA in the early 70s.
Time to totally defund UCLA BY 100% no more money for you UCLA your on your own
“…using the Establishment’s own resources to train subversives whose mission is to tear down the Establishment.” UCLA must be SO proud.
If the only simians that should be tolerated are those that persist in the arboreal existence, then Pol Pot had it right in terms of direction. But extermination of a quarter of his population was clearly insufficient. He simply failed to follow through to success.
And who knows what the proper proportion of the population is properly discarded? We’ll simply have to replicate the activity in another cultural venue until we determine the parameters for success. Let’s just hope the social surgery works before we run out of subjects upon whom to experiment.
Science marches on.
The poison of unreason, or irrational philosophy, irrational ideology, irrational ideas has always come from the philosophers at the universities, nothing new about that.
And before there were universities and professional intellectuals and philosophers the poison of unreason came from the priests, the rabbis, the mullahs, the imams, the shamans.
And before that the witch doctors.
And after all of that people like you
Thorax 1138’s personal troll would follow him into the after life to deliver his withering scorn.
Not since Raymond Massey portrayed John Brown upon the gallows have we witnessed such moving drama.
And I thought my life was empty.
Raises many questions. Most distasteful and disparaging about UCLA. And, by the way, when did UCLA become an elite university (except during John Wooden’s tenure as basketball coach)?
“Elite” universities are our problem….especially the Ivy League ones.
The activists will be some of the first eliminated when the fascists gain full control. The leftists use the activists for their agendas but also know they really aren’t controllable in the long run.
College students have been fighting against the American system or way of life for decades. For a century in fact. How many generations of students or parents does it take to finally smell a rat? This thing never ends. Why is that? Who is the chump here? Them or us?
Nice to know where your kid’s tuition money is funneled to. Better to send them to the University of McDonalds, where at least they can learn life skills, such as making change, turning burgers, ckeaning the restrooms and the chewing gum from underneath of the tables
University of Crybullies, Losers and Antifa
I didnt think wokies were capable of “critical rhought”, but only “groupthought” – can one then sue for false advertising??
Nice to know where your kid’s tuition money is funneled to.
Jibberish masquerading as political commentary. These “useful idiots” are blind to the fact that the revolution chews up and spits out these SJW morons who have outlived their usefulness.
Check this out. Read every word of the “About” page. The Luskin school not only throughly covers all relevant academic disciplines, but the BoD is an interconnected tissue of academic and business leaders-subversives. They, in turn, would be plugged right into bureaucratic and political structures…and your wallet.
unfortunately it is too late for america . as thomas sowell quoted during the 2020 election” if biden gets in it will be the end of america ” and he should know . he has worked in the system for more than 50 yrs. the foundation has been white anted for too long and will inevitably collapse . it is only a matter of time and you wont have to wait long . just like the unsinkable titanic , it is a race to the bottom . the robespierres of america have sown its demise .
Textbook for this course is Alinsky’s rules for radicals
I posted a comment along with the web address of the Luskin Institute (above). The address turned into a full page which is covering ,y comment. What I wrote was that the “About” section of the Luskin web site has a list of the members of the BoD with a full description–including the businesses these BoD members own. Read the bios of the BoD, note their businesses and BOYCOTT them AND let them know that you are boycotting them and why.
These children rec9ieve not an education but instruction to protest which builds nothing. How many for how long have this type of Education? With their degrees in hand they got out into the world to challenge everything they are told to. This is education?