|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The present migration crisis in Europe and the USA is being brought about by globalists operating on the Marxist principle of a worldwide redistribution of wealth, but at the same time a world controlled by powerful global economic interests. The result will be a dictatorship albeit not a dictatorship of the proletariat (yet, nevertheless, claiming to be in the name of the dispossessed). As under communism, personal possessions by the masses will be extremely limited or non-existent, and this will be accomplished in the name of the environment (“sustainability”).
The ruling “interests” supposedly will override the inherent selfishness of the West (but not their own selfishness). Western Civilization will no longer be the locus of economic domination. Under the new communist-inspired reductio, despite the political dissolution of colonialism, the West is still in charge of the world economy and thus continues to subordinate the interests of the second and third world countries to their own. According to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and to the pundits and second-rate minds that drafted the U.N. Agenda 2030, as well as pseudo-visionaries like George Soros, John Kerry, Greta Thunberg, Klaus Schwab, and Yuval Noah Harari (Schwab’s right-hand man at the WEF), there is a racial component to economic domination that must be overcome and that is linked to the economic dominance of Western Civilization over all other cultures in South America, Africa, and Asia.
The blaming of Western Civilization and American civilization for the poverty of the non-Western world is all part of the globalist propaganda machine. The flooding of third world immigrants into Europe and the USA is not just part of the “blame game,” but the money given to migrants will be sent back to their native countries and these funds are being encouraged by the lefties as partial reparations owing to capitalist, Western exploitation of the poorest people in the world. The premise is that their labor and natural resources have been making Western civilzation rich while consigning the LDC’s (less developed countries) to poverty. The huge migrations are part of supposedly “righting of this wrong” (of exploitation).
Yuval Harari is a “guru” of the World Economic Forum. The WEF wishes to bypass sovereign, national governments, both democratic and communist. Harari is especially known as a promoter of “inorganic life” which seems to mean robots or the robotization of humans. That is transhumanism — the merging of humans and machines, guided by the philosophy that humans themselves are nothing but machines, some being “useful” and others “useless eaters.” Harari has indicated that human history can be divided into Fascist, Communist, and Liberal. The Fascist was defeated in WWII, the Communist model tanked in 1990 with the collapse of the governmental system of the USSR, and now, with the advances in technology, liberalism no longer has a narrative.
By promoting transhumanism and AI solutions to humankind’s problems, an impersonal element is introduced into the equation. Supposed solutions reached by AI in dealing with various socio-economic problems such as food distribution, birth control, gender equality, proper respect for environmental resources, distribution of wealth, use of natural resources, and educational opportunities will be accomplished on a non-biased basis by AI.
Presumably AI will prevent class exploitations, since political and economic decisions will be made based on objective representations that properly balance resources with needs on a worldwide basis. Thus, supporters of technological direction for the globe seems to void all narratives about partisan political bias in decision-making. Presumably the idea of benefiting all through a master class of technocrats developing and using AI worldwide to meet all “needs” will eliminate all claims of governmental bias.
Yet, this theory advances the idea of communism, namely the ideal of the Rousseauian General Will as being pre-eminent in governance, which was the grandfather to the communist ideal of the good of all (not the utilitarian ideal of the greatest good of the greatest number) being pre-eminent. The communist ideal of the good of the proletariat being identifiable with the good of all is replaced by a more abstract algorithmic ideal of the good of all, yet both have the ideal of suppressing the individual.
The importance of the individual is a profoundly Christian ideal. Christianity is concerned about the potential eternal happiness of every individual based on his or her salvation in light of his or her relationship with Christ. Thus, the views of the WEF and the sustainability freaks who insist that we stop eating meat, stop driving gas-powered automobiles, stop using gas stoves, get used to living in smaller spaces and closer to our jobs, and stop making a big deal about the sanctity of male or female identity (which distracts from the supposedly more important issues of sustainability) are directly in opposition to the essence of Christianity.
The globalist/environmentalist claim is that our relationship with the worldwide environment under the advanced auspices of computer-generated intelligence promises the most practical hope for all societies, and, following that, for each individual living in those societies. Christianity continues to offer life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as rights derived from Almighty God from which relationship and rights derive the real hope of the individual.
As Joshua said to his people after they had crossed the Jordan River into the Promised Land:
“And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods… of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” (Joshua 24:15)
Jeffrey Ludwig is a prolific online article writer for more than 12 years. He has published four books available here, and has been a teacher at both the high school and university levels for decades. He also was editor of the International Trade Alert, a leading weekly export-import publication.
“ closer to our jobs”
That is proof that the whole thing is a scam. Here in the UK the government subsidises net zero and solar energy and electric vehicles and wind turbines and everything OTHER than helping people reduce their commute and it would be easy here because the motorways between cities are rammed every morning and every evening.
When they ban Bibles but allow Korans that seems to me like established religion with is not allowed by he 1st Amendment
Harari is a sad, shrill, tragic figure. Brilliant but so invested in a “story” paradigm that reduces all human interaction to postmodern transactions. Finding his own existence unbearable, he seeks to create an artificial reality that provides him peace but makes him no less impotent in his day to day activities. His rendition of what is wrong with the world, and why so many loathe him, is based on a succession of straw men that no-one on the right will even recognize, much less identify with. I want to hug him and tell him reality is OK, not to be feared, but he strikes me as the type who recoils from human contact. Sad, sad person.
Your compassion for Harari speaks very well of you, but I am unfortunately not as good a person as you are. I find his ideas beneath contempt and his influence dangerous. He’s just the sort of fellow who ought to sit down and shut up.
The globalists want full control of every country…..they are chomping at the bit for the One World bloated bureucracy where Freedom and Liberty is dead.
Telling what Yuval Noah Harari means with transhumanism does not mean it will be possible.
In religious terms, it means that the human will is taken over by the devil. But the devil wants conversion by free will.
In physical and neurological terms it might be deadly and people will avoid such implants
God wants followers by free will. Satan will use any means possible. Most possessions are not by choice.
I once had a cat who was quite sick and into whom I had to force liquid
Prednisone. He put up a fierce battle every time I did that. It was useless
to try to explain to the cat what a steroid was and how it would affect his
respiratory system to make him well. A higher consciousness (mine) in
the universe in which he dwelled would have to prevail against his own
limited one, if he had a chance to survive. Which he eventually did.
We humans are like a cat. We understand that there are billions of
galaxies and trillions of planets – that the yuge planet Earth is really only
a speck in the universe. We know about DNA and how utterly unique
each human being is – in the microscopic aspect of our existence. Know
how astoundingly complex everything in our world really is and how much
we still don’t know. And, of course, our moral choice as we journey through
life – that is, to choose to love one another or to wrongly choose not to – is
always with us.
There is a higher consciousness behind the purpose of our human lives –
which we can dimly sense but cannot really understand. The same higher
consciousness that created life from the inanimate albeit combustible
universe. No matter that the God-like wannabes at the WEF may create
cyborgs, robotic humans, chip controlled/computer interfaced humans or
AI monsters – the Transhumanists as of 2024 cannot create life from total
non-life. Only the higher consciousness of God has been able to do that.
Could God really be aware of each infinitesimally tiny individual life on that
speck of a planet called Earth? And even care about us? By the same
measure, how could beings as insignificant as us in the vastness of the
universe be aware of the possible existence of God? Yet in our consciousness
we are aware and require individual freedom – not transhuman transgression –
to reach out to God via our individual conscience to serve him always. And
not serve tyranny-technocrats.