|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Come on, you knew this was coming. Never let a crisis go to waste. Instead of providing immediate aid, the Biden-Harris administration worsened the crisis in North Carolina. Because a crisis justifies setting aside election rules.
North Carolina’s election board voted Monday to give residents in the western part of the state, which was hit hardest by Hurricane Helene, greater flexibility to vote by mail and run their elections.
Voters in 13 counties heavily affected by the storm will have more ways to obtain and deliver absentee ballots, while county boards will have more ability to modify their election administration plans. The changes, approved by unanimous vote of the bipartisan board, come 10 days before early voting begins in the battleground state and as mail voting is already underway.
Voters in those counties who want to cast ballots by mail will be able to request and receive them in person until Nov. 4, the day before Election Day, rather than the Tuesday before, under the usual rules. They will also be able to drop off their ballots at any county board of elections in the state or any polling sites in their counties. Previously, voters were limited to dropping absentee ballots off at the board of elections or early voting sites in their counties.
While some flexbility makes sense after a natural disaster, this is a formula for flooding the election with unaccountable mail ballots aimed at counties under the firm control of partisan political machines.
Who benefits? That’s a tough one.
It’s not tough to work out who will game it the most thoroughly.
The Dems have been playing this game with enthusiasm for years and have an extensive and well practiced network of ballot box stuffers.
Side benefit of FEMA not rescuing all those people and allowing them to die is that they will from now on vote D in perpetuity
…and the votes will continue to be counted for weeks if necessary until Harris wins with 180% of the vote.
“Who benefits? That’s a tough one.”
Not so tough, Daniel. See, here’s what you do: if your preferred candidate win, you claim it as a victory for the people. If your preferred candidate loses, then you claim the whole thing was rigged in the first place. You’ve been doing it for years now, Daniel. Maybe you think people haven’t noticed…???
why was challenging the results of the 2020 election misinformation and banned on social media, but not the results of the 2016 election?
Who benefits? The Democrats.
The problem is that there is no countervailing force to the Democrat Party.
Well you knew the Left would take advantage of a good crisis! Wonder if our last election was in 2020.